Second Appeal No. 47 of 2017
Parties: Rameshkumar Hanjarimal Rathod Versus Kantabai Lalchand Gandhi
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDESH D. PATIL
Advocates: For the Appellant: Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar a/w Dhananjay A. Utture, Ritesh R. Raut & Ganesh S. Pharakate, Advocates. For the Respondent: Tejpal S. Ingale a/w Vrunali Vilankar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Limitation Act, 1963 - Article 22 -
...
W.A. No. 1624 of 2026 & C.M.P. No. 14899 of 2026
Parties: The Commissioner of School Education, DPI Campus, Chennai & Others Versus D. Buela Priyadharshini & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellants: Dr. R. Gouri, Govt. Counsel. For the Respondents: R1, G. Sankaran, Senior Counsel for S. Nedunchezhiyan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 2298,
...
WP.(MD). Nos. 34278 & 36587 of 2025 & WMP.(MD). Nos. 27123 & 29095 of 2025
Parties: C. Arundurai & Another Versus The Commissioner, Commissionerate of Prohibition & Excise Department, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Muthucharan Sundaresh, M. Rajarajan, A. Mohamed Haneef, D. Venkatesh, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, R2, R4 to R7, B. Saravanan, Senior Counsel, C. Jeganathan, Counsel for State, R3, I. Murugesan, Government Advocate (Crl.side), R5 & R8, AR.L. Sundaresan, Senior Counsel, T. Bashyam, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Writ Petition No. 5492 of 2011
Parties: Santosh Versus Prakash & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE NIVEDITA P. MEHTA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P.R. Karekar & R.D. Narkhede, Advocates. For the Respondents: R2 to R5, S.S. Hulke, AGP, R1, Dhiraj Bhoyar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Tenancy Act, 1958 - Section 46 & Section 59-A -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-NAG 7934,
...
CRL.MC No. 4939 OF 2026
Parties: M. Ashhar Shabeeb Versus Union Territory Of Lakshadweep Represented By Standing Counsel Of Lakshadweep, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ajit G Anjarlekar, G.P. Shinod, Govind Padmanaabhan, Atul Mathews, S.B. Gayathri, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, R.V.Sreejith, Standing Counsel, U.T. Administration Of Lakshadweep, Sanal.P.Raj, Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 418 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 46063,
...
C.C. No. 2159, 2005, 2272 of 2025 in/and W.P. No. 17370, 17408, 19326 of 2025
Parties: K. Anitha & Others Versus Ahmed Nadeem & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioners: P. V. Ramana, Advocate. For the Respondents: - - - -
Head Note:
Subject
...
M.A.C.M.A. No. 1062 of 2019
Parties: The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Picket Depot, Secunderabad & Another Versus R. Shirisha & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
Advocates: For the Petitioners: R. Anurag, (Sc For TSRTC). For the Respondents: Ramachandrareddy Gadi, Advocate.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 -
...
WP. (C) of 6283, 524, 5946, 5999 of 2025
Parties: Ganesh Bhumij @ Faloo Karmakar & Others Versus The State of Assam represented by the Chief Secretary, Dispur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
Advocates: For the Petitioners: A. Atreya, Advocate. For the Respondents: S.S. Roy, Government Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 GAU-AS 9422,
...
C.M.A. No. 1874 of 2026 & C.M.P. No. 14999 of 2026
Parties: M/s. ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd., Coimbatore Versus S. Barkathulla & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: D. Harikrishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act - Section 173 -
...
W.P.(MD). Nos. 7415, 6183, 9526 & 16387 of 2026 & W.M.P.(MD). Nos. 6087, 7591, 7592 & 12226 of 2026
Parties: M/s. Dugars, Represented by its Partner, Manjo Kumar Dugar, Kodaikanal & Others Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sharath Chandran, S. Sakthi Siddharth, E. Balaji, M/s. H. Jasima Yasmin, M/s. Ajmal Associates, RM.Arun Swaminathan, Advocates. For the Respondents: T. Gowthaman, Addl. Advocate General, M.P. Senthil, Counsel for State, Srinath Sridevan, Senior Counsel to Assist the Honourable Court, S. Venkatesh Counsel for State.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 14, 21, 226, 254(2) & 300-A – Registration Act, 1908 – Section 34-C – Registration (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2026 (Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 2026) r/w Rule 55-A of “the Tamil Nadu Registration Rules” – Constitutional Validity – Registration of Documents – Writ Petitions – Petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of newly inserted Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, cont...