Total Judgements Found: 1250

FAO. No. 86 of 2021

Parties: Badshah & Another Versus Union Of India

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

Advocates: For the Appellants: Rohit Nagar, Advocate. For the Respondent: Subhash Tanwar, SPC, Sandeep Mishra, Harshit Deshwal, Mohit Kumar Tomar, Mayank Sehrawat, Advocates.

Head Note:

Railways Act, 1989 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 3652,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 DHC 279 Court: High Court of Delhi Date: 29 Apr 2026
Bail Appln. No. 768 of 2026

Parties: Nitesh @ Vinay Versus State (NCT Of Delhi)

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Kuldeep Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Amit Ahlawat, APP.

Head Note:

Arms Act -

Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 3619,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 DHC 278 Court: High Court of Delhi Date: 29 Apr 2026
W.P. No. 8166 of 2024 & W.P.(Crl.). No. 396 of 2025 & W.P.(MD). No. 26676 of 2025 & WP. (Crl.). MP. No. 184 of 2025

Parties: Arappor Iyakkam, Rep. by its Managing Trustee Jayaram Venkatesan, Chennai & Others Versus The Director Directorate of Vigilance & Anti-Corruption, Chennai & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN

Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: P.S. Raman Advocate General, E. Raj Thilak & K.M.D. Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutors, P. Kumaresan, Additional Advocate General, E. Ranganayaki, AGP, V. Raghavachari Senior Counsel, N.R. Elango, Senior Counsel, V. Karthic, Senior Counsel, D.R. Arun Kumar, Standing Counsel, S. Senthil, J. Srinivasa Mohan, A.G. Vedavikas, Dr. V. Suresh, J. Senthil Kumaraiah, M/s. TVJ Associates, Advocates.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 1636,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 3007 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 29 Apr 2026
C.M.A. No. 3720 of 2026

Parties: S. Umadevi & Others Versus Poorvikaas Global Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Chennai & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

Advocates: For the Petitioners: M/s. K. Balaji, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, S. Srinivasan, Advocate, R1, Notice dispensed.

Head Note:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 3066 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 29 Apr 2026
Civil Revision Petition No. 4347 of 2025

Parties: M/s. Garden Restaurant Versus T. Surya Kiran

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Chetluru Sreenivas, Advocate. For the Respondents: Venkatesh Deshpande, Advocate.

Head Note:

Civil Procedure Code - Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 TSHC 254 Court: High Court for the State of Telangana Date: 29 Apr 2026
M.A.C.M.A. No. 1045 of 2019

Parties: Mohammed Khaja & Others Versus K. Venkateshwarlu & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Mohd Abdul Haleem, Advocate. For the Respondents: ----------

Head Note:

Section
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 TSHC 256 Court: High Court for the State of Telangana Date: 29 Apr 2026
Civil Revision Petition No. 1346 of 2026

Parties: Venkata Aswini Reddy Koyya @ Ashu Reddy Versus Yenumula Satyanarayana Murthy & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. SAM KOSHY

Advocates: For the Petitioner: V. Murali Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondent: ----------

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 227 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 TSHC 253 Court: High Court for the State of Telangana Date: 29 Apr 2026
Criminal Appeal No. 754 of 2009

Parties: The State Of A.P., Rep. By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of A.P., Hyderabad Versus Injeti Yesuratnam & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

Advocates: For the Appellant: Public Prosecutor, C.P. Somayaji, Addl.Public Prosecutor. For the Respondents: Jakkamsetti Ravindra, Advocate.

Head Note:

Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 372/374(2)/378(4) -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 APHC 739 Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Date: 29 Apr 2026
Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 559 of 2017 with Chamber Summons No. 217 of 2018 In Notice of Motion No. 688 of 2018 In Notice of Motion No. 350 of 2019 In Chamber Summons Nos. 45, 234, 763, 1080 of 2019 In Chamber Summons Nos. 32, 40 of 2020 In Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 559 of 2017 with Interim Application (L) Nos. 50, 1929, 1938, 2136, 19656, 24824, 32205, 32962, 37939 of 2024 In Interim Application (L) Nos. 10227, 10632, 10988, 11413 of 2026 In Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 559 of 2017 with Interim Application (L) Nos. 3390, 23486 of 2022 In Interim Application (L) Nos. 7108, 8065 of 2025 In Interim Application No. 410 of 2021 In Interim Application Nos. 1912, 2365 of 2024 with Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 559 of 2017 with Interim Application (L) No. 12903 of 2021 In Interim Application No. 8210 of 2025

Parties: Mulund Raviraj Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Versus Rupji Constructions & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Tushar Dahibawkar a/w. Vikhil Dhoka & Abhijit Mukherjee, Shadab Jan a/w. Sujit Lahoti, Tejasvi Nakashe, & Nidhi M. Jain i/b. Sujit Lahoti & Associates, Dormaan J. Dalal a/w. Shirley Mody, Ankita Singhania i/b. K. Akshay, Shivprasad D. Borade a/w. Sayli Apte, Sunita S. Warang a/w. Dinesh Sanap & Mandar Nalawade, Advocates.

Head Note:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 2(1)(h), 9, 17, 21, 37 – Interim Measures – Privity to Arbitration Agreement – Section 9 Jurisdiction – Third Party Intervention – Development Agreement – Arbitration Proceedings – Petition under Section 9 with multiple interim applications including by decree holders and third parties unconnected with arbitration agreement.

Court Held – Section 9 Petition disposed &n...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 BHC 841 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay Date: 29 Apr 2026
Writ Petition No. 10185 of 2025

Parties: Mangal Mahadu Korde Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.J. JAMADAR

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Anurag R. Mishra i/by Adwait Bhonde, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mamta S. Srivastava, AGP, R3 & R4, Ravindra Sonba Pachundkar, R5, Vijaykumar Dighe with Turerao, Advocates.

Head Note:

Constitution of India – Articles 226, 227 – Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 – Section 39 – Removal of Sarpanch – Misconduct – Requirement of Reasons – Natural Justice – Writ Petition – Challenge to order of State Government removing elected Sarpanch in appeal for alleged irregularities in execution of works without tender process.

Court Held – Writ Petition dismissed – Though impugned ord...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 BHC 847 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay Date: 29 Apr 2026