CDJ Prime Search Portal

Writ Petition No. 28483 of 2025

Parties: Ramankol Rohit Versus Union of India represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Bonthu Lokesh Phanindra Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondent: Deputy Solicitor General of India, Advocate.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -...

Writ Petition No. 11567 of 2025

Parties: Vidyasagar Parchuri & Another Versus IDBI Bank, A scheduled bank under the provisions of Banking Regulation Act, Rep. by its Deputy General Manager & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

Advocates: For the Petitioners: Kanumuri Kalyani, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.V.S. N. Raju, Advocate.

Head Note:

Banking Regulation – RBI Master Circulars (01.07.2013 & 01.07.2015) – Willful Defaulter Classification – Natural Justice – Maintainability – Article 226 – Proceedings challenged against IDBI Bank Limited. Petitioners alleged violation of procedural safeguards under RBI Master Circular and illegality in issuance of show-cause notice, non-supply of forensic audit report and non-speaking orders.

Court Held – Writ Petition dismissed &nd...

Consumer Complaint No. 677 of 2015

Parties: M/s. Nancy Lake Homes Co. Op. Housing Society Ltd. Versus Nancy Icon Builders And Developers & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.P. SAHI, PRESIDENT & THE HONOURABLE MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, MEMBER

Advocates: For the Complainant: Dnyanaraj G. Sant, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties: Rahul S. Gandhi, Advocate.

Head Note:

Criminal Appeal No. 303 of 2024

Parties: Nishant Versus Anti Terrorist Squad, Lucknow, through Investigating Officer, Uttar Pradesh & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Advocates: For the Appellant: Sunil Maohar, Sr. Advocate a/b C.B. Barve, Advocate. For the Respondents: S.S. Doifode, Addl. Public Prosecutor a/w A.B. Badar, APP.

Head Note:

Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 66F - Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3(1)(c), 5(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) & 5(3) - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374 - Cyber Terrorism - Official Secrets - Mens Rea - Classified Documents - Honey Trap - Appeal - Appellant challenged conviction and sentence passed by Sessions Court for offences under Section 66F of the Act of 2000 and Sections 3(1)(c), 5(1)(a), (b), (c), (d) & 5(3) of the Act of 1923 - Allegation of u...

Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2019

Parties: Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale & Others Versus State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station Jaripatka, Nagpur

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANDESH S. DESHPANDE

Advocates: For the Appellants: Aniruddha Jaltare, C.F. Bhagwani, Advocates. For the Respondent: N.B. Jawade, Additional Public Prosecutor.

Head Note:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 r/w Section 34 – Criminal Appeal – Murder – Eyewitness Evidence – Medical Evidence – Recovery of Weapons – DNA Evidence – Delay in Dispatch of Muddemal – Hostile Panch Witnesses – Appeal by accused challenging conviction and life sentence passed by Sessions Court – Prosecution relied on testimonies of wife, children and independent eyewitness – Medical evidence establish...

Writ Appeal No. 1325 of 2022 (SC-ST)

Parties: Poojari Narayanappa Since Dead By Lrs. & Others Versus The State of Karnataka Revenue Department, Bangalore & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

Advocates: For the Appellants: V. K. Narayana Swamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3 Pramodhini Kishan, Aga, R4 & R5 M. Shivaprakash, K.V. Manjunath, Advocate.

Head Note:

Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Section 5 - Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Section 4 – land was granted to grantee as he belonged to scheduled caste - legal representatives of the grantee initiated the proceedings under Section 5 of the Act - respondent No.3 allowed the application for restoration of land; being aggrieved, the purchasers filed appeal and the appeal came to be dismissed - Being aggriev...

Criminal Appeal No. 716 of 2009

Parties: The State of Maharashtra (Through Anti-Corruption Bureau, Pune) Versus Maruti Bhikaji Borkar & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE NEELA GOKHALE

Advocates: For the Appellant: Anuja Sunil Gotad, APP. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Uday Dube, Senior Advocate, with Balwant Salunkhe, R3, Saurabh Butala, Advocates.

Head Note:

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2), 20 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 313, 378 – Appeal against Acquittal – Demand and Acceptance – Trap – Anthracene Powder Test – Plea of Alibi – Log-book Entries – Scope of Appellate Interference – Whether acquittal based on unproved alibi sustainable – Whether demand and recovery proved beyond reasonable doubt.

C...