| |
CDJ 2025 GHC 537
|
| Court : High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad |
| Case No : R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Anticipatory Bail) No. 24907 Of 2025 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI |
| Parties : Virendrabhai Trambakbhai Jani Versus State Of Gujarat |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Applicant: Jignesh L. Hajare(3994), Advocate. For the Respondent: Soaham M. Joshi, APP. |
| Date of Judgment : 01-12-2025 |
| Head Note :- |
| Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 - |
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules / Orders / Regulations, and Sections Mentioned:
- Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
- Section 483(2)
2. Catch Words:
- anticipatory bail
- bail
- personal bond
- surety
- investigation
- police
- obstruction
- inducement
- passport
- violation of bail conditions
3. Summary:
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, claiming to have deposited Rs. 1.65 crore as demanded by the complainant. The prosecution produced a bank statement confirming the credit of the amount to Gujarat Gas Limited. Relying on precedents such as Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra, Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors., and Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), the court inclined to grant bail. The court ordered that, upon arrest, the applicant be released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to several conditions including cooperation with investigation, residence restrictions, and no travel abroad without permission. The order clarified that the bail does not impede police investigation and that the trial court must not be influenced by the anticipatory bail order. Direct service of the order was permitted.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed |
| Judgment :- |
|
Oral Order
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for respondent - State of Gujarat.
2. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short "BNSS"), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being C.R. No.11211050240505 of 2024 registered with Thangadh Police Station, Surendranagar for the alleged offences as mentioned in the FIR.
3. Heard learned advocate Mr. Jignesh L. Hajare on behalf of the applicant, who would submit that keeping aside the averments of the FIR as of now and without admitting the same, the applicant herein has deposited the amount of Rs. 1,65,00,000/- (One Crore Sixty Five Lakhs), which was mentioned by the original complainant in the FIR, i.e. the bill amount for the alleged illegal usage of gas by the applicant herein, by way of a Demand Draft drawn on HDFC Bank dated 02.05.2025 in the name of Gujarat Gas Limited. He further states that, the applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed while releasing him on anticipatory bail. Learned advocate therefore submitted that, considering the above facts, the applicant may be granted anticipatory bail.
4. Learned APP has also produced the bank statement of the Gujarat Gas Limited, from wherein it is reflected that the said amount of Rs.1,65,00,000/- has been credited in its account on 03.05.2025. Thus, without further going into the merits of the case, the present application deserves to be allowed.
5. Considering the aforesaid aspects and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. reported in (2011) 1 SCC 6941, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitution Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. reported in (1980) 2 SCC 665 and also the decision in the case of Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2020) 5 SCC 1, I am inclined to allow the present application.
6. In the result, the present application is allowed by directing that in the event of arrest / appearance of the applicant in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11211050240505 of 2024 registered with Thangadh Police Station, Surendranagar, the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount on the following conditions that the applicant:
(a) shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation whenever required;
(b) shall remain present at the concerned Police Station on 08.12.2025 between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. and the IO shall ensure that no unnecessary harassment or inconvenience is caused to the applicant;
(c) shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;
(d) shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
(e) shall at the time of execution of bond, furnish the address to the investigating officer and the court concerned and shall not change their residence till the final disposal of the case till further orders;
(f) shall not leave India without the permission of the Court and if having passport shall deposit the same before the Trial Court within a week;
(g) It is open to the police or the investigating agency to move the learned trial Court for a direction under Section 483(2) to arrest the accused, in the event of violation of any term, such as absconding, non- cooperating during investigation, evasion, intimidation or inducement to witnesses with a view to influence outcome of the investigation or trial, etc.
7. It is made clear that, order of anticipatory bail does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of the police or investigative agency, to investigate into the charges against the applicant, who has been granted pre-arrest bail.
8. During the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima facie observations made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
|
| |