This Product is Licensed to ,
Change Font Style & Size
Show / Hide
Font
Arial
Book antiqua
Charcoal
Courier
Cursive
Geneva
Helvetica
Impact
Sans-serif
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Verdana
Font Size
24
Font Style
Italic:
Bold:
Underline:
Case No :
Judges:
Parties :
Appearing Advocates :
Date of Judgment :
01-01-1970
Head Note :-
Summary :-
1.
Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- NDPS Act
2.
Catch Words:
- Bail
- Contraband substance
- Small quantity
- Criminal antecedent
- Sub judice
- Trial court
- Supreme Court
- Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
3.
Summary:
The petitioner sought bail, arguing that new evidence from prosecution witnesses indicated she possessed only a small quantity of contraband, for which she had already served the prescribed custody period. A key witness recanted her earlier statement, weakening the prosecution’s case. The State opposed bail, citing the petitioner’s criminal antecedents and prior rejection of bail by both the High Court and Supreme Court. The trial court had also rejected a similar bail application earlier. The Court noted the petitioner was involved in another NDPS case and that the trial was ongoing. It held that the final outcome of the trial was uncertain, and no grounds for bail were established at this stage.
4.
Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed
Judgment :-
CDJLawJournal
