WP.(C). No. 1781 of 2020
Parties: M/s. Aquatech Versus The Jammu & Kashmir Sports Council & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate, Anirudh Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Anshuja Tak, Advocate.
Head Note:
Subject
...
WA No. 80 of 2025
Parties: The State of Tripura to be Represented by the Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Tripura & Others Versus Mina Deb, Tripura
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Advocates: For the Appellant: Dipankar Sarma, Additional Government Advocate. For the Respondent: Purusuttam Roy Barman, Senior Advocate, Kawsik Nath, Aradhita Debbarma, Advocates.
Head Note:
Subject
...
IA. No. GA-COM. 1 of 2026 In CS-COM. 4 of 2026
Parties: Foodimentary India Limited Versus Raghunath Exports Private Limited
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA ROY
Advocates: For the Plaintiff: Suddhasatva Banerjee, Sr. Advocate, Shashrat Nayak, Debayan Sen, Mahima Cholea, Deepti Priya, Advocates. For the Respondent: --------.
Head Note:
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - Section 12A -...
Writ Petition No. 1266 of 2026
Parties: Chennuru Rajani & others Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh & others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Tharigopula Surya Chaitanya, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP for Home, GP for Revenue.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 126 -
...
C.M.A. Nos. 2466 of 2021 & 1740 of 2022 & C.M.P. No. 12692 of 2022 & C.M.A. No. 1740 of 2022
Parties: Subbulakshmi & Others Versus Gopalakrishnan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: C. Vidhusan, J. Michael Visuvasam, Advocates.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, - Section 173 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 271,
...
Criminal Petition No. 67 of 2026
Parties: Varla Naresh Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By Its Public Prosecutor, Amaravati
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: D. Purnachandra Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 480 & 483 -
...
(T).CMA. (TM). No. 112 of 2023
Parties: M/s. Karnataka Cooperative Milk Producers Federation Limited, Bangalore Versus Vinod Kanji Shah & Nitin Kanji Shah & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Ravi, SC, A. Venkatesh Kumar, R. Sanjeev, A. Shravan, Advocates. For the Respondents: R2, J. Madanagopal Rao, SPC, R1, Served & No Appearance.
Head Note:
Trade Marks Act, 1999 – Sections 9, 11, 18, 91 – Deceptive Similarity – Phonetic Similarity – Well Known Mark – Opposition to Registration – Appeal against rejection of opposition to registration of identical mark “nandini” in Class 3 – Issue whether identical word mark with similar style amounts to deceptive similarity despite different goods.
Court Held – Appeal allowed – Impugned order set aside
Family Court Appeal No. 195 of 2014
Parties: XXX Versus XXX
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M. Venkateswari, Advocate. For the Respondents: Thadikonda Koteshwara Prasad.
Head Note:
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 2(2), Section 13(1)(i)(a) – Applicability – Scheduled Tribe – Void Marriage – Jurisdictional Error – Proof of Custom – Appeal against dismissal of divorce petition – Petitioner (Scheduled Tribe) challenged validity of alleged marriage under HMA on ground of statutory exclusion – Family Court dismissed petition without deciding applicability of Act.
Court Held – Family Court Ap...
BA No. 12 of 2026B
Parties: Archana Das Sarkar, Tripura & Another Versus The State of Tripura (Represented by the Secretary, Home Department), Government of Tripura
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Advocates: For the Applicants: Janardhan Bhattacharjee, Advocate. For the Respondent: Raju Datta, Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short-‘BNSS’), 2023 - Section 483 -
...
Revision Petition No. 725 of 2022
Parties: Ghaziabad Development Authority, Through Vice Chairman Versus Ajay Kumar Singh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, PRESIDING MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, MEMBER
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Siddharth Sengar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Subject
...