Crl. R.C. No. 1785 of 2023
Parties: D. Jebamanickam Versus G. Muthuraman
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M. Prabhakar, Advocate. For the Respondent: K. Alakendran, Advocate.
Head Note:
BNSS - Section 438 r/w 442 -
...
W.P. No. 39721 of 2025 & W.M.P. No. 44633 of 2025
Parties: The Chairman & Managing Director, M/s.Bharat Electronics Limited, Bengaluru & Others Versus The Secretary, BEL - TEX Employees Union, M/s. Bharat Electronics Limited, Chennai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Haroon Al Rasheed, for M/s. Advit Law Chambers, Advocates. For the Respondents: L. Singaravelu, Party-in-person.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
LPA. No. 248 of 2025 & HCP. No. 75 of 2025 & CM No. 6534 of 2025
Parties: Suraj Masih Versus U.T. of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Govt. Home Department, Civil Secretariat, Srinagar, Jammu & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN PALLI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Palvi Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Head Note:
Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act - Section 8 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 JKLHC-JMU 58,
...
W.P.Nos. 24508 & 22832 of 2025
Parties: Andhra Pradesh Animal Husbandary Gazetted Officers Association, Rep. by its President, Chs. Krishna Rao Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By its Special Chief Secretary, Andhra Pradesh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G.V.S. Kishore Kumar, P. Durga Prasad, Advocate. For the Respondent: Government Pleader for Services – I, II, Chiranjeevi Talasila
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
LPA. No. 206 of 2025
Parties: Huzaif Ahmad Dar Versus Union Territory of J&K & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN PALLI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Asif Ali, Advocate. For the Respondents: Illyas Nazir, GA.
Head Note:
Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 - Section 8 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 JKLHC-SGR 8-DB,
...
Bail Appl. No. 14491 of 2025
Parties: Kamal Kumar Mandal Versus State Of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sam Isaac Pothiyil, S. Suraja, C.A. Muhammed Suhair, N.K. Akshaya, Advocates. For the Respondents: M.C. Ashi, SR.PP .
Head Note:
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(c) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 7240,
...
Bail Appl. No. 14491 of 2025
Parties: Kamal Kumar Mandal Versus State Of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sam Isaac Pothiyil, S. Suraja, C.A. Muhammed Suhair, N.K. Akshaya, Advocates. For the Respondents: M.C. Ashi, SR.PP .
Head Note:
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(c) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 7240,
...
WP. (IPD) No. 37 of 2025
Parties: Rajesh Rangwani Versus The Registrar of Trade Marks, Office of The Trade Marks Registry, Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Hemant Daswani, Advocate. For the Respondent: K. Subbu Ranga Bharathi, Central Government Counsel.
Head Note:
Trade Mark Rules - Rule 57 -
...
CONT.CAS.(CRL). No. 5 of 2025
Parties: Court On Its Own Motion Versus Sanjucta Kabasi, Advocate
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. (Amicus Curiae). For the Respondent: Party-In-Person.
Head Note:
Subject
...
CS (OS). No. 698 of 2025, I.A. Nos. 24508, 24510 & 28922 of 2025
Parties: Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede Versus Red Chillies Entertainments Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Authorised Representative, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Advocates: For the Plaintiff: J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Advocate, Shaktiki Sharma, Purnima Vashishtha, Jatin Parashar, Rohit Bhagat, Kunal Vats, Aprajita, Tanya Arora, Sanyam, Advocates. For the Defendants: D1, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Shyel Trehan, Sr. Advocates, Janay Jain, Monisha, Mane Bhangale, Bijal Vora, Rhea Rao, Ashutosh Agarwal, Pranav Sarthi, Rohan Poddar, Vidhi Jain, Ayush Raj, Prachi Dhingra, Udit Bajpai, Utkarsh Vatsa, D2, Angad Makkar, Raghav Goyal, Advocates, Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate, Saikrishna Rajagopal, Sidharth Chopra, Sneha Jain, Devrat Joshi, D3, Ankit Parhar, Tejpal Singh Rathore, Abhishek Kumar, Sanchi Sethi, D4, Mamta R. Jha, Rohan Ahuja, Mshruttima, D5, Amee Rana, Thejesh Rajendran, Tanuj Sharma, D6, Sankalp Udgata, Jeevan Ballav Panda, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 19 – Order VII Rule 10 & 11 – Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 – Territorial Jurisdiction – Defamation – Online Publication – Suit for Damages and Injunction – Plaintiff, an IRS Officer, sought permanent injunction and damages alleging defamatory content in web series “The Ba*ds of Bollywood” – Defendants objected to maintainability on ground of lack of territorial jurisdictio...