Case No. WP. (C) of 3323 of 2019
Parties: Gias Uddin Versus The Union Of India, Represented By The Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Ahmed, Advocate. For the Respondents: A. Verma, SC, Home Deptt., G. Sarma, SC, NRC, P. Sarma, GA, Assam, A.I. Ali, SC, ECI, B. Sarma, CGC, N. Kalita, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
WP. (C) No. 6207 of 2019
Parties: Md. Amir Ali Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: B. Islam, Advocate. For the Respondents: A. Verma, SC, Home Deptt., G. Sarma, SC, NRC, P. Sarma, GA, Assam, P. Sarma, GA, Assam, A.I. Ali, SC, ECI.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 GAU-AS 8665,
...
W.P. (MD) No. 16183 of 2026
Parties: P. Tamilselvan Versus The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Ltd., Rep. by its General Manager, Trichy
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Arunachalam, Advocate. For the Respondent: S.C. Herold Singh, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Writ Petition No. 7163 of 2026
Parties: Mahmood Cricket Club, Rep. by its Secretary Imran Mahmood Versus The Hyderabad Cricket Association, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Zeeshan Adnan Mahmood, Advocate. For the Respondents: V. Rajender Rao, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 14 and 226 – Sports Associations – Ombudsman Order – Development Fund – Hyderabad Cricket Association – Maintainability of Writ Petition – Mandamus – Petitioner Club sought implementation of Ombudsman’s order directing payment of development fund of Rs.3,00,000/- per annum from 2017-18 onwards – HCA contended that payment of development fund was an internal policy matter dependent upon a...
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 239 of 2018
Parties: The Central Bureau Of Investigation through H.O.B., Anti Corruption Branch, C.B.I., Patna Versus The State Of Bihar & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Satyabir Bharti, Sr. Advocate, Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, Bipin Kumar Sinha, Advocates, Sanjay Kumar, SC, CBI. For the Respondents: R1 to R5, Raghwanand, GA-11, Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, AC to GA-11, R6, None.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 -
...
Writ Petition No. 1558 of 2020
Parties: M/s. Utkarsha Vividha Karyakari Sahakari Society, Through its President namely Nitin V. Korde, Amravati Versus The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner II, Regional Office, Akola & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S.M. Vaishnav, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, B.A. Kale Advocate.
Head Note:
Employees’ Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Section (7-A) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-NAG 7995,
...
C.M.A(MD)Nos. 1007 of 2025 & CMP(MD) No. 15189 of 2025
Parties: The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Salem Versus Rajakumari & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: N. Dilipkumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, N. Sudhagar Nagaraj, R3, R. Sadeswaran, Advocates.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act - Section 173 -
...
I.A. No. 3 of 2026 IN/AND Second Appeal No. 205 of 2022
Parties: Sammeta Venkata Ramana Versus Sammeta China Venkata Narayana
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, Advocate. For the Respondent: T. Lakshmi Padmaja, Advocate.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 100, Order XLI Rule 27 – Specific Relief Act – Sections 16(c), 20 – Indian Evidence Act – Section 114(g) – Specific Performance – Additional Evidence – Second Appeal – Defendant challenged concurrent decrees granting specific performance of agreement of sale and sought to produce additional documents in...
W.P(MD)No. 16285 of 2026 & W.M.P(MD)Nos. 12123 & 12124 of 2026
Parties: Poongodi Versus The District Collector, Tuticorin & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: VR. Shanmuganathan, Advocate. For the Respondents: C. Jeganathan for State.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
W.P(MD)Nos. 15202, 15374, 15529, 15732, 15747, 15842, 15851, 15905, 15907, 15908, 10870, 10871, 10872, 10873, 10875, 12977, 13601 & 12379 of 2026 & W.M.P(MD)Nos. 11384, 11385, 11523, 11524, 11626, 11811, 11812, 11853, 11867, 11921, 11925, 11929, 11932, 8469, 8470, 8498, 8499, 8521, 8522, 8482, 8484, 8472, 8474, 9722, 10123, 10124, 9365 & 9367 of 2026
Parties: M. Padma Versus The Additional Registrar General, Madras High Court - Madurai Bench, Madurai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: V. Sundari, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R2 & R4, M. Mahaboob Athif, Advocate, R3, R5 & R6, S. Venkatesh, for State.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...