Appeal From Order No. 226 of 2025 with Interim Application (ST) Nos. 7484, 12988, 12990, 12993, 12997, 14151, 14154, 14155, 14156, 14158, 14160, 14366, 14368 of 2025 In Appeal From Order Nos. 226, 227, 247, 248 of 2025 with Interim Application Nos. 7163, 7164, 7481 of 2025 with Appeal From Order (ST) Nos. 12996, 12987, 12992, 12989 of 2025
Parties: Ganpat Shankar Chougule & Others Versus The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Advocates: For the Appellants: Aseem Naphade a/w. Malhar Bageshwar, i/by Samir M. Suryawanshi, P.J. Thorat a/w. J.S. Yadav, i/by Bholaprasad S. Shukla, Karl Tamboly a/w. Aadil Parsurampuria, Mehul Rathod, Dhanashree Pawaskar & Darshana Vora, i/by Mr. Mehul Rathod, Advocates. For the Resondent: Pooja Khandeparkar a/w. Neeta Jadhav, i/by Komal Punjabi, Advocates.
Head Note:
Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 – Section 349 – Unauthorized Structures – Suppression of Earlier Litigation – Injunction Suit – Due Process of Law – Exemplary Costs – Appeal From Order – Appeals challenged dismissal of Notice of Motion seeking injunction against demolition of structures near Kandivali Railway Station – Held, appellants had no right, title or interest in land belonging to Cooperative Housing Society and...
Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 34357 of 2024 with Interim Application No. 1072 of 2025 In Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 34357 of 2024 with Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 34371 of 2024 with Interim Application No. 1880 of 2025 In Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 34371 of 2024 with Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 34382 of 2024 with Interim Application No. 1071 of 2025 & etc.,
Parties: Pr Commissioner of Income Tax Central 4 Versus Citron Infraprojects Limited AADCC3735C & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SONAK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Suresh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Income Tax Act, 1961 – Sections 153A, 153D, 260A, 119 – Prior Approval – Non-Application of Mind – Mechanical Sanction – Jurisdictional Requirement – Substantial Question of Law – Income Tax Appeals – Revenue challenged ITAT order quashing assessments on ground that prior approval under Section 153D was granted mechanically – Held, approvals issued en masse within minutes with identical wording and glaring discrepancies demon...
LA APP No. 35 of 2022
Parties: Anjana Das Choudhury Versus The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction-2) & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Advocates: For the Appellant: N. Majumder, Dcosta Ivo Manuel Simon, Advocates. For the Respondent: B. Majumder, Deputy SGI.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Order XLI Rule 27 -...
O.S.A(CAD). SR. No. 90611 of 2024
Parties: Omega Ecotech Products India Pvt. Ltd., Coimbatore Versus Ollas Biotech Private Limited, Represented by its Director, Sudheeran Sugandhi, Kerala & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G. Kalyan Jhabakh, M/s. Surana & Surana, Advocates. For the Respondents: ------.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -...
RPFC NO. 310 of 2018
Parties: Ratheesh Chandran Versus S. Ramadevi & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ajit G Anjarlekar, Govind Padmanaabhan, G.P. Shinod, Advocates. For The Respondents: R.B. Rajesh, Advocates.
Head Note:
Maintenance - Section 125 Cr.P.C., 1973 - An educated wife is not precluded from claiming maintenance- The test is whether the wife is able to maintain herself more or less in the status that her husband has maintained her - The wife is entitled to live the same standard of life as she lived with the husband - The expression ‘unable to maintain’ in Section 125 of Cr.P.C must be interpreted to mean the actual inability to sustain rather than mere potential earning cap...
Criminal Appeal No.100335 Of 2022 (C)
Parties: Bhimappa Versus The State Of Karnataka, Rep. by. Addl. State Public Prosecutor, Dharwad
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. DEVDAS & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI
Advocates: For the Appellant: A.R. Patil, Advocate. For the Respondent: M.B. Gundawade, Addl. S.P.P.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 498A, 302 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 374(2), 313, 357, 357A – Murder of Wife – Cruelty – Eyewitness Testimony of Child Witness – Circumstantial and Ocular Evidence – Appeal against Conviction – Accused husband convicted for subjecting wife to cruelty suspecting fidelity and hacking her to death with axe – Trial court relied on consistent ocular evidence of daughter (...
WP(C) Nos. 15946, 17829, 20978, 28040, 28212, 28220, 29872 of 2011 & 7381, 11115 of 2012
Parties: M/s. National Timbers, Cochin, Represented By Its Managing Partner Shyad & Others Versus Union Of India , To Government, Ministry Of Customs And Central, Excise, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A. ZIYAD RAHMAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: T.M. Abdul Latiff, Anil D. Nair (Sr.), M. Balagopal, Nivedita A.Kamath, J.R. Prem Navaz, Advocates. For the Respondents: P.R. Sreejith, Senior Central Govt. Counsel, Sreelal Warrier, SC, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2025 KER 90236,...
R/First Appeal No. 1604 Of 2015
Parties: New India Insurance Company Ltd Versus Minor Shilpaben Rajubhai Parmar & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.L. ODEDRA
Advocates: For the Appellant: G.C. Mazmudar(1193), H.G. Mazmudar(1194), Advocates. For the Defendants: Tatvdeep J. Jani(7227), Advocate.
Head Note:
Subject...
Bail Appln. No. 972 of 2025 & Crl.M.A. No. 30842 of 2025 Permission To File Add. Documents, Crl.M.A. 30843/2025 Exemption From Filing Certified Copies
Parties: Abhishek Anil Versus Narcotics Control Bureau
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Lewish Edward, P. Vignesh, Gyanendra Singh, Sameer, Advocates. For the Respondent: Arun Khatri, SSC, Shelly Dixit, Tracy Sebastian, Poonam Rani, Priyanka, Advocates.
Head Note:
NDPS Act - Section 67 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 DHC 10447,...
L.P.A. Nos. 41 & 42 of 2025 & C.M.P. Nos. 19362, 19360 & 19359 of 2025
Parties: S. Sunil Versus Senthamarai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: A. Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor, Suhrith Parthasarathy, S. Sathia Chandran for D. Ashok Kumar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
Cases Referred:
Ram Kishan Fauji vs. State of Haryana and others - (CDJ 2017 SC 299)
D.Kumar vs. Raichand Daga and others - (CDJ 2020 MHC 2631)