W.P. (MD) Nos. 24167 & 24485 of 2025 & W.M.P. (MD) Nos. 18968, 18969, 19220, 19221 & 19222 of 2025
Parties: K. Nalayini & Another Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU
Advocates: For the Petitioners: H. Mohammed Imran for M/s. Ajmal Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, R2, R5 & R6, N. Satheesh Kumar, Addl. Government Pleader, R3, P. Gunasekaran, Standing Counsel, R4, S. Vinayak, Standing Counsel, R4, P. Anbunithi, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...
AR. No. 96 of 2025
Parties: M/s. P.K. Chandrasekharan Nair & Co., Hindustan Petroleum Dealer, Represented by Its Managing Partner K.C. Anilkumar, Thripunithura Versus M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mumbai, Represented By Its Chief Regional Manager, Ernakulam
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANU
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Reji George, S. Saisankar, Joseph Raju Mathews, Advocates. For the Respondent: E.K. Nandakumar, Sr. Advocate, M. Gopikrishnan Nambiar, K. John Mathai, Joson Manavalan, Kuryan Thomas, Paulose C. Abraham, Raja Kannan, Nayanpally Ramola, Pooja Menon, Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 11(6) – Indian Partnership Act, 1932 – Section 19(2)(a) – Maintainability – Implied Authority of Partner – Express Authorization – Partnership Disputes – Arbitration Request – One partner of a two-partner firm filed an arbitration request invoking the arbitration clause in the dealership agreement. Respondent objected citing Section 19(2)(a) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932,...
L.P.A. SR. No. 168957 of 2024
Parties: D. Pepi Devi Versus M/s. GM Modular Private Limited, Mumbai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: N. Nithianandam, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) LW 74,...
Civil Revision Petition No. 16 of 2020
Parties: Ankem Venkata Swamy Versus Immanni Sriramachandra Murthy & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Satyanarayana Murthy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mahadeva Kanthrigala & T.V.S. Prabhakara Rao, Advocates.
Head Note:
Revision Petition No. 2798 of 2023
Parties: The Bundi Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Versus Maharaj Shri Amardas Ji Khaki Smriti Sansthan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, MEMBER
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Umesh Nagpal, J.P Sharma, Advocates (VC). For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Subject...
Revision Petition No. 82 of 2024
Parties: Savitri Devi Versus Dr. N.N. Khanna & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AVM JONNALAGADDA RAJENDRA, AVSM, VSM (RETD), PRESIDING MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MR. ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Abhishek Kumar Singh, Anamika Yadav, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, Manoj Prasad, Sr. Advocate with Ajay K. Srivastava, Sidhartha Srivastava, R2, Utkarsh Singh with Vikrant Singh Bais, Advocates.
Head Note:
Subject...
Writ Petition Nos. 23848, 23851 Of 2025 (GM-PASS)
Parties: Master Abdul Ahad Azad Versus Union Of India, Ministry Of External Affairs, Represented By Its Secretary, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Nagaraj, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Aditya Singh, CGC, Amit Mandagi, Swathi Mandagi, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227 -
Comparative Citations:
2025 KHC 49560, 2026 (1) KCCR 113,...
Civil Revision Application Nos. 64, 304 of 2021 with Interim Application No. 18325 of 2022
Parties: Maharukh Mediomah Patel Versus Ruksana Barodawala & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Kashmira Bharucha i/b Prasad Gajbhiye, Gayatri Sharma with Khushboo Yadav i/b M/s. S.K. Srivastav & Co., Advocates.
Head Note:
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Section 6 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order VII Rule 3 – Restoration of Possession – Forcible Dispossession – Caretaker Grabbing Property – Description of Suit Property – Executable Decree – Cross Revisions – Suit under Section 6 dismissed by Trial Court despite recording finding of illegal dispossession, solely on ground of insufficient description of suit property – Plaintiff so...
Crl. A. No. 186 of 2021 & Crl. MP. No. 9091 of 2024
Parties: Hemanthkumar Versus The State, represented by Inspector of Police, Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: R. Sankarasubbu, Advocate. For the Respondent: A. Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by M. Arifa Thasneem, Advocate.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374 (2) -
...
Criminal Application No. 328 of 2025
Parties: Sachin Dattaram Kadam Versus State of Maharashtra, (At the instance of Andheri Police Station)
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDESH D. PATIL
Advocates: For the Applicant: G.L. Dalvi a/w Yogita V. Gogar, Advocates. For the Respondent: P.P. Shinde, Addl. P.P., Vinod Patil, Advocate.
Head Note:
Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants & Bar Rooms & Protection of Dignity of Women (working therein) Act, 2016 - Section 3 & Section 8 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 BHC-AS 53231,
...