Writ Petition No. 39123 of 2025 & W.M.P. Nos. 43904 & 43908 of 2025
Parties: Chettinad Academy of Research & Education, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, Sivaramakrishnan Hariharan, Chengalpattu, Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Principal Secretary, Health & Family Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Vijay Narayan, Senior Counsel, Vaibhav R. Venkatesh, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, M. Sneha, Special Counsel, R3, Shubharanjani Ananth, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 MHC 2750,...
CRL.MC No. 10624 of 2025
Parties: DR. R. Lalu Jones Versus State Of Kerala , Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K.I. Sageer, Muhammed Yasil, Advocates. For the Respondents: A. Rajesh, Special Public Prosecutor, VACB, S. Rekha, Sr. Public Prosecutor, VACB.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 KER 93391,...
M.A.C.A. No. 2619 of 2021
Parties: The Divisional Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Represented by Its Manger, Thiruvananthapuram & Another Versus Ameer Hamsa & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Mathews Jacob (Sr.), P. Jacob Mathew, Preethi R. Nair, A.R. Nimod, M.A. Augustine, K.S. Santhi, Advocates.
Head Note:
Comparative Citations:
2025 KER 93385, 2026 (1) KLT 28,...
CRL.A NO. 302 of 2014
Parties: K. Manoharan Versus State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Advocates: For the Appellant: P.S. Sreedharan Pillai, Arjun Sreedhar, T.K. Sandeep, Advocates. For the Respondent: A. Rajesh, Special Public Prosecutor, VACB, ,S. Rekha, Senior Public Prosecutor, VACB.
Head Note:
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) – Bribe Demand and Acceptance – Trap Case – Phenolphthalein Test – Recovery from Drawer – Absence of Revised Plan in File – Sentence Modification – Appeal – Accused, Panchayat Secretary, convicted for demanding and accepting ₹500/- as bribe for approving revised building plan – Defence contended absence of revised plan, negative phenolphthalein test a...
WP No. 47216 of 2025
Parties: M. Suresh Versus The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Chennai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Manickavel, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R. Sidharth, CGSC.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Arbitration Appeal (ST) No. 30899 of 2025
Parties: Villa Realcon LLP Versus Chandresh Parbat Gothi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w Akhilesh Dubey, Amit Dubey, Uttam Dubey, Shubham Sharma, Alex D’souza i/b Law Counselors, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, Dr. Virendra Tuljapurkar, Senior Advocate a/w Onkar Chandurkar, Nachiket Khaladkar, R3 to R8, Rahul Sinha a/w Soham Bhalerao & Harshit Tyagi i/b DSK Legal, Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 8, Section 11, Section 12(1), Section 37 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order II Rule 3, Order II, Rule 6 - Disputes between the parties relates to the allotment of the Additional Developed Area contracted under the 2019 MoU - Appeal filed impugning an order, by which the court below rejected an Application filed by the Appellant under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act -
Court held - non-compliance with the Consent Decree...
WA. No. 24 of 2019 Clubbed with WP(C) No. 583 of 2019
Parties: Th. Rajen Singh & Others Versus State of Manipur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Advocates: For the Petitioners: --------. For the Respondents: --------.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 Lab IC 289,
...
Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 788 of 2024 with Interim Application (Lodg.) No. 35173 of 2023
Parties: Kotak Securities Limited Versus Gajanan Ramdas Rajguru
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Pesi N. Modi, Senior Advocate with Kunal Kataria, Shailesh Prajapati & Ankit Singhal i/b Dua Associates, Advocates. For the Respondent: Nitesh V. Bhutekar with Aaditya Mahamiya, Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34 – Section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 –Indian Contract Act, 1872 – Sections 71 & 163 – Margin Trading – Technical Glitch – Unjust Enrichment – Scope of Judicial Review – Petitioner-broker erroneously reflected undue margin in client’s trading account; client executed F&O trades worth Rs.94.81 crores and earned net profit of Rs.1.75 cror...
Writ Petition No. 5764 of 2025
Parties: Chandrashekhar Bhimsen Naik Versus State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Kushal Mor a/w Tanmay Karmarkar, Vaibhav Hari, Rishab Khot, Ashish Prasad, Anubha Rastogi & Aditya Joshi i/b Tanmay Karmarkar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Supriya Kak, APP.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 35(1)(b)(ii), 35(3), 47, 48 – Constitution of India, 1950 – Articles 21, 22 – Section 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 356(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) – Section 66 C and 66 D of Information Technology Act, 2000 – Illegal Arrest – Reasons for Arrest – Notice of Appearance – Mechanical Remand – Deepfake Cyber Fraud FIR – Habeas Corpus – Petitioner challeng...
Interim Application No. 3243 of 2025 with Interim Application No. 4005 of 2025 In Suit No. 23 of 2025
Parties: Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, Through its Trustee Charu Mehta & Others Versus Niket Mehta
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
Advocates: For the Plaintiffs: Atul Damle, Senior Advocate a/w. Dakshesh Vyas, Abhishek Prabhu, Jyoti Ghag, Shailesh & Ankit Singhal, i/by Dua Associates, Advocates. For the Defendant: Pankaj Sawant, Senior Advocate a/w. Aloukik R. Pai, Saharsh Sakhare & Priyanka Rammurthy, i/by Aloukik Rajendra Pai, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order VII Rule 11(d) – Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 – Sections 50, 51 – Rejection of Plaint – Consent of Charity Commissioner – Public Trust – Recovery of Compensation – Trustee – Application seeking rejection of plaint on ground of non-compliance with Sections 50 and 51 of MPT Act – Suit filed by Public Trust for recovery of compensation from defendant alleged to have illegally oc...