Total Judgements Found: 10000

Criminal Appeal No. 623 of 2014

Parties: Kadamban Versus State Of Karnataka Through, Bellavai Police Station Represented By: The State Public Prosecutor, Bangalore

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

Advocates: For the Appellant: Hasmath Pasha, Sr. Counsel, N.A. Kariappa, Advocate. For the Respondent: B. Lakshman, HCGP.

Head Note:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 366A, 376 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 374(2) – Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 – Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India – Age of Consent – Retrospective Operation of Penal Statutes – Acquittal – Appeal Appellant challenged conviction for offences under Sections 366A and 376 IPC. Held, victim was above 16 years at the time of incident; medical evidence showed intact hy...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 Kar HC 1850 Court: High Court of Karnataka Date: 04 Dec 2025
W.P. No. 47386 of 2025 & W.M.P. Nos. 52895, 52897 & 52898 of 2025

Parties: Essay Pressings, Represented By its Proprietor, Shaik Alawdeen Abdul Basith Versus The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Sholinganallur Assessment Circle, Chennai & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN

Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Sanjay Rajul for S. Anandh, Advocates. For the Respondents: P. Selvi, Government Advocate.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 MHC 7022 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 04 Dec 2025
W.P. No. 973 of 2022 & W.M.P. No. 1037 of 2022

Parties: M/s. MRF Limited, Rep by its Plant Head, Puducherry Versus K. Velmurugan

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Anand Gopalan for M/s. T.S. Gopalan & Co, Advocates. For the Respondent: P.R. Thiruneelakandan, Advocate.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -

Comparative Citation:
2025 MHC 2765,...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 MHC 7023 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 04 Dec 2025
Review Aplw. (MD) No. 138 of 2024 in W.P. (MD) No. 3509 of 2021

Parties: M. Velusamy Versus The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Temple, Palani, Dindigul & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI

Advocates: For the Petitioner: V.R. Shanmuganathan for P. Jayaveerapandi, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, R. Murali, R2 to R6, Karthikeya Venkatachalapathy, Advocates, R7, No appearance.

Head Note:

Civil Procedure Code - Section 114 -...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 MHC 6990 Court: Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Date: 04 Dec 2025
W.P. No. 33069 of 2022 & W.M.P. No. 32476 of 2022

Parties: The Management of International Bakery Products Limited, Represented by its Authorised Representative Akhauri Vivek Sahay, Villupuram Versus The Joint Director of Industrial Safety & Health, Cuddalore & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sanjay Mohan, M/s. S. Ramasubramaniam & Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, E. Vijay Anand, Additional Government Pleader, R2 to R13, S. Sathiachandran, Advocate.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 MHC 6948 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 04 Dec 2025
Sales Tax Reference No. 3 of 2010 In Reference Application No. 68 of 2004

Parties: The Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mumbai Versus Sudha Instant Soft Drinks & Essences, Nagpur

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SONAK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Advocates: For the Applicant: Amar Mishra, AGP. For the Respondent: -----.

Head Note:

Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Section 61 -

Comparative Citation:
2025 BHC-OS 23507,...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 BHC 1874 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay Date: 04 Dec 2025
H.C.P. (MD) No. 520 of 2025

Parties: B. Savundammal Versus The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government, Chennai & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN & THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA

Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Anand, Advocate. For the Respondents: T. Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 MHC 6919 Court: Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Date: 04 Dec 2025
C.M.A. Nos. 2447 of 2024 & 3355 of 2025, C.M.P. No. 19460 of 2024

Parties: Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Chennai & Another Versus Veeramuthu & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: R2, M/s. R. Sree Vidhya, R1, M/s. Ramya V. Rao, M/s. Ramya V. Rao, Advocates, R1, Dispensed.

Head Note:

Motor Vehicles Act - Section 173 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) TNMAC 79,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 031 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 04 Dec 2025
Civil Appeal No. 14565-14566 of 2025 (@ SLP(C) 32849-32850 of 2025 @ Diary No. 56596 of 2024)

Parties: BPL Limited Versus Morgan Securities & Credits Private Limited

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondent: -------

Head Note:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 31(7)(a) & (b) – Contractual Interest – Bill Discounting Facility – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Sections 37, 64 & 80 – Usurious Loans Act, 1918 – Limitation Act, 1963 –Acknowledgment & Part Payment – Commercial Contracts – Joint and Several Liability – Review Jurisdiction – Appeal – Challenge to concurrent findings upholding arbitral ...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 SC 1871 Court: Supreme Court of India Date: 04 Dec 2025
Miscl. First Appeal No. 203079 of 2023 (MV-D) c/w Miscl. First Appeal No. 203913 of 2023

Parties: The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, S.S Front Road, Vijayapura Versus Parvati & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TYAGARAJA N. INAVALLY

Advocates: For the Appellant: Manvendra Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R5, Bapugouda Siddappa, Advocate.

Head Note:

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 173(1) – Section 166 – Notional Income – Multiplier – Future Prospects – Consortium – Deduction for Personal Expenses – Reassessment of Compensation – Appeals – Insurer sought reduction of award; claimants sought enhancement; Held, Tribunal erred in taking age as 49 years despite PW-1’s evidence showing deceased was 61, requiring multiplier ‘7’; notional income of ₹...

Case ID: CDJ 2025 Kar HC 1902 Court: High Court of Karnataka (Circuit Bench OF Kalaburagi) Date: 04 Dec 2025