W.P No. 10066 of 2017
Parties: P. Nambi Versus The President (Representing the Board of Directors), Tamil Nadu Handloom Weavers, Cooperative Society, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: C. Venkatesan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R3, M. Muthusamy, GA, K. Rangesh For R2, M. Jayaraman, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...
Arb. O.P. (Com.Div.) No. 354 of 2021
Parties: M/s. Oriental Cuisines Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by its COO, V. Ramanarayanan, Chennai Versus Sricharan Foods Rep. by its Proprietor Lavanya, Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Vijayan Subramanian, Advocate. For the Respondent: M. Sivavarthanan, Senior Counsel.
Head Note:
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34(2)(iv) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) TLNJ 15,...
Application U/S 529 BNSS No. 91 of 2025
Parties: Roshni Kashyap & Another Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH LAVANIA
Advocates: For the Applicants: Mahendra Pal Chauhan, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties: G.A.
Head Note:
Maintenance - Section 125, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 144, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Speedy relief - In the instant case, a prayer was made to direct the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow, for the expeditious disposal of the Interim Maintenance Application dated 02.01.2025, seeking urgent financial assistance for the subsistence of Petitioner No. 1 and education and welfare of Petitioner No. 2 (minor child), filed by the applicant alo...
CONT P(MD) No. 3594 of 2025
Parties: Rama.Ravikumar Versus K.J. Praveenkumar IAS, District Collector, Madurai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: RM. Arun Swaminathan, Advocate, KPS.Palanivelrajan, Senior Counsel. For the Respondents: R1, J. Ravindran, Addl. Advocate General, Assisted by S.S. Madhavan, Addl. Government Pleader, R2, Veera.Kathiravan Addl. Advocate General, Assisted by S. Ravi, Addl. Public Prosecutor Pleader, R3, Jothi, Senior Counsel for V. Chandrasekar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Section 11 – Constitution of India – Articles 129, 215, 261 – BNSS, 2023 – Section 163 – Willful Disobedience– Enforcement of Judicial Directions – Temple Rituals – Karthigai Deepam – Petitioner sought action for failure to light Deepam at Deepathoon as directed in WP(MD) No.32317 of 2025. Authorities lit Deepam only at Uchi Pillaiyar Temple and issued prohibitory order under Section 163 B...
ITA. Nos. 353, 354 of 2025
Parties: Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-1, New Delhi Versus Clifford Chance Pte Ltd
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: Puneet Rai, SSC, Ashvini Kr., Rishabh Nangia, Gibran, JSC. For the Respondent: Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate, Adityya Vohra, Kunal Pandey, Tanmay, Advocates.
Head Note:
Income-Tax Act, 1961 - Section 260A -
Comparative Citation:
2025 DHC 10838,...
W.P. No. 45933 of 2025 & W.M.P. Nos. 51224 & 51225 of 2025
Parties: M/s.Sri Kadeshwara Tex, Rep by its Proprietor Balachander Thambigounder Versus The Deputy State Tax Officer – II, Central – II Assessment Circle, Tiruppur
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M. Varun Pandian, Advocate. For the Respondent: P. Selvi, Government Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...
WA No. 3698 of 2025 & CMP Nos. 30499, 30504 & 30501 of 2025
Parties: Abid Basha Versus Vijayalakshmi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: R. Balaramesh, Advocate. For the Respondents: R5 to R10, T.K. Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause XV -...
LPA. No. 31 of 2023 c/w LPA. No. 93 of 2023 & LPA. No. 100 of 2023 & LPA No. 103 of 2023 & LPA. No. 107 of 2023 & LPA. No. 108 of 2023 & LPA. No. 109 of 2023
Parties: Union Territory of J&K through Health & Medical Education Department Versus Pankaj Jasrotia & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN PALLI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Raman Sharma, AAG. For the Respondents: Abhinav Sharma, Sr. Advocate, Mazher Ali Khan, Liaqat Ali, Mudassir Maqbool, Advocates.
Head Note:
Subject
Comparative Citation:
2025 JKLHC-JMU 3995,
...
Writ Petition Nos. 14354 & 14355 of 2025
Parties: Priyanka Yogesh Gavhane & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Advocates: For the Petitioners: V.D. Sapkal, Senior Advocate a/w. Y.V. Kakade i/b. Z.H. Farooqui, Advocates. For the Respondents: D.R. Korade, S.K. Tambe, AGP’s, R7, R10, R.B. Ade, Sachindra Shetye a/w. Sharayu Dhanture & Akshay Pansare, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 245ZG– Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 – Section 10(2) – Maharashtra Municipal Councils and Nagar Panchayats Election Rules, 1966 – Rules 12, 13, 15 – Rejection of Nomination – Annexure-2 Authorization – Opportunity to Rectify – Election Process – Writ Petitions – Petitioners challenged appellate orders rejecting nominations for Wa...
RFA No. 648 of 2016
Parties: M/s. Paramount Apartments, Kochi, Represented By Its Partner K. Paul Joseph Versus Marykutty Baby & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: Mathew B. Kurian, K.T. Thomas, Advocates. For the Respondents: Dinesh R. Shenoy, A.R. Dileep, Ebin Mathew, George Varghese, K.K. Jyothilakshmy, A. Joseph George, P.J. Joe Paul, Manu Sebastian, Advocates.
Head Note:
Limitation Act of 1963 - Article 62, Article 64 - Transfer of Property Act - Section 55(6)(b) - What is the nature of agreement - Who committed breach of agreement - Is the plaintiff entitled for recovery of possession on the strength of prior possession - Is the plaintiff entitled for return of the advance amount paid under agreement - Is the plaintiff entitled to recover the value of the 'B' schedule- improvements in the plaint 'A' schedule property –
Co...