RPFC No. 343 of 2024
Parties: V.P. Abdurahiman Versus C. Safiya
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: C. Dinesh, P. Samsudin, Jasneed Jamal, A.B. Lira, E.D. Devika, Abin Rashid, K. Ramakumar (Sr.)
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Section 125 – Muslim Personal Law – Maintenance – Remarriage after Talaq – Doctrine of Halala – Proof of Dissolution of Intervening Marriage – Burden of Proof – Revision – Wife sought maintenance alleging remarriage with former husband after talaq – Family Court granted maintenance – Husband challenged on ground that dissolution of wife’s intervening marriage and alleged remar...
Writ Petition No. 29953 Of 2025
Parties: M/s. Shiva Shakti Agro Industries & Others Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by It‟s Secretary AP Civil Supplies Corporation & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
Advocates: For the Petitioners: S. Shanti Prasad, Ld. Counsel. For the Respondents: R1, E. Samba Siva Pratap, Ld. Addl. Advocate General, R5 & R6, N. Bharat Babu, Ld. Counsel.
Head Note:
Tender Conditions – Disqualification – Mandatory Self-Declaration – BIS Standards (IS 17853:2022) – Non-Submission of Documents – Judicial Review – Writ Petition – Petitioners challenged rejection of their technical bid for FRK tender on ground of failure to submit self-declaration confirming possession of plant and machinery complying with BIS standards – Held, Clause-3.14 is an essential condition going to root of bidder’s ...
Criminal Appeal No. 793 of 2019 with Criminal Appeal No. 719 of 2018
Parties: Gajanan & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Officer, P.S. Lohara, Yavatmal
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANDESH S. DESHPANDE
Advocates: For the Appellants: V.D. Awchat, Advocate. For the Respondent: R1, Shamsi Haider, APP.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 307 r/w 34, 299, 300, 304, 323 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 27 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 313 – Indian Arms Act – Section 4/25 – Murder and Attempt to Murder – Common Intention – Sudden Fight – Recovery of Weapon – Medical and Injured Eyewitness Evidence – Appeal against conviction – Accused No.1 convicted under Section 302 IPC an...
BA. No. 52 of 2025
Parties: Rabbi Ali Versus State of Meghalaya represented by its Commissioner & Secretary (Home) Police Department, Shillong & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE W. DIENGDOH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Thapa, S. Khatun, S. Khyriem, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, J. Thabah, GA, A. Khan, Legal Aid Counsel.
Head Note:
POCSO Act - Sections 3/4/13/14 -
Comparative Citations:
2025 MLHC 1180, 2026 CrLJ 735,
...
Criminal Bail Application No. 2430 of 2025
Parties: Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali Versus Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK
Advocates: For the Applicant: Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Jugal Kanani i/b. Prabanjay R. Dave, Advocates. For the Respondents: R2, Sangeeta Shinde, APP, R1, Manisha Jagtap a/w Yashashree Raut, Advocates.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 2 (7), Section 2 (9), Section 2 (14), Section 2 (15), Section 2 (31), Section 2 (36), Section 2 (37), Section 318, Section 335, Section 336, Section 338, Section 340 (2), Section 483 – Indian Penal Code – Section 420 - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Section 2 (u), Section 2 (v), Section 2 (1) (u), Section 45, Section 50 – Accused persons had collected the documents of identity from the informant, hi...
OP(KAT) No. 476 of 2025
Parties: S.V. Seetha Devi Versus State of Kerala Represented By The Secretary To Government, Revenue Department Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MURALEE KRISHNA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Achuth Kylas, Sreedevi Kylasanath, K. Bindu, P. K. Sachin, Varghese Xavier, R.S. Ananthu, Advocates. For the Respondents: B. Unnikrishna Kaimal, Sr. Gp.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 227 -
Comparative Citations:
2025 KER 94249, 2026 (1) KLT 362,
...
Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 33165 of 2024 with Interim Application (L) No. 33727 of 2024
Parties: MahaOnline Limited Versus Aksentt Tech Services Limited
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Advocates: For the Applicant: Kevic Setalwad, Senior Advocate with Jahan Lalkaka, Kunal Bhanage, Ayushi Doshi, Riya Pichaya & Animish Dighe i/b M/s. Indialaw LLP, Advocates. For the Respondent: Alpana Ghone with Rashmin Khandekar, M.A. Kamdar, Hersh Choksi & Krishit Nandu i/b M/s. Kanga & Co., Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Section 34 – Challenge to Arbitral Award – Business Associate Agreement – Clause 28(b) – Payment Mechanism – Privity of Contract – Limitation – Evidence Appreciation – Petition – Petitioner challenged arbitral award directing payment of Rs.25,27,78,775/- with interest and costs – Contention that payment obligation arose only after receipt from RDD.
Court Held &ndas...
A.S. No. 18 of 2023
Parties: G. Durai Versus. M.K. Chennaiyan
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
Advocates: For the Appellant: D. Selvam for S. Praveennath, Advocates. For the Respondent: T. Sundaravadanam, Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 96 -
...
Civil Appeal No. 14604 of 2025 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8303 of 2025)
Parties: Bolla Malathi Versus B. Suguna & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
General Provident Fund (Central Service) Rules, 1960 - Rule 5, Rule 33 - When the deceased joined service, he nominated the respondent no.1 (mother) as recipient of GPF, Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme (‘CGEGIS’)and the Death cum Retirement Gratuity (‘DCRG’)- deceased married the appellant and subsequently nominated her as recipient for CGEIS and DCRG only - deceased died in service - appellant has received all benefits - when she appl...
SWP. No. 1957 of 2010
Parties: Tariq Ahmad Lone Versus Union of India & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Z.A. Qureshi, Sr. Advocate, I.A. Parray, & Babar Bilal Malik, Advocates. For the Respondents: Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG.
Head Note:
BSF Act - Section 62(1) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 Lab IC 302,
...