Criminal Appeal No. 539 of 2017
Parties: Shamdhan Versus Vidhya & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Advocates: For the Appellant: S.G. Ladda, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, S.M. Ganachari, APP, R1, Smita S. Kulkarni & Kiran M. Nagarkar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138 -
Case Referred:
Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar and Another, - (2025) 10 SCC 96)
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 43454,
...
Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2005
Parties: Mukund Versus The State of Maharashtra
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: Nilesh S. Ghanekar, h/f R.R. Imale & S.P. Chapalgaonkar, Advocates. For the Respondent: C.V. Bhadane, APP.
Head Note:
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 7 -
Case Referred:
B. Jayaraj vs. State of A.P., - (2014) 13 SCC 55)
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 43410,
...
WP.(MD). No. 27428 of 2026 & W.M.P.(MD). No. 20780 of 2026
Parties: M/s. Oasis Hometex Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, C. Ashokkumar, Karur Versus The Karur Municipal Corporation, Rep. by the Commissioner, Karur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: N. Shanmuga Selvam, Advocate. For the Respondents: K. Balasubramani, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
First Appeal No. 9 of 2022
Parties: Waman Maruti Suryawanshi & Another Versus Union of India, through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE AARTI SATHE
Advocates: For the Appellants: Vasant More, i/by Deepak Sadvilkar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Niranjan P. Shimpi, with Bhagyashri Waghmare, Advocates.
Head Note:
Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Section 23 -
Cases Referred:
Union of India Vs. Rina Devi - (2018 ACJ 1441)
Jameela & Ors. Vs. Union of India(2010 ACJ 2453)
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 39102,
...
Miscellaneous Application No. 2485 of 2023 in MA No. 1700 of 2023 in C.A.No. 6849 of 2022
Parties: New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (Noida) Versus Kendriya Karamchari Sehkari G.N. Samiti & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SURYA KANT, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V. MOHANA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Vipin Nair, AOR, Aditya Narendranath, Naman Tyagi, M.B. Ramya, Deeksha Gupta, Puspita Basak, Madhavi Yadav, Ashok Kumar, A.K. Ganguli, Sr. Advocate, Subodh Kr. Pathak, Anurag Rana, Pawan Kumar Sharma, Arunima Chatterjee, V. Elangovan, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR, Ravindra Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Binay Kumar Das, AOR, Priyanka Das, Neha Das, Shivam Saksena, Vikash Chandra Shukla, AOR, Lakshya S. Pandey, Siddhartrh Relan, Astha Singh, Isha Barshiliya, Ali Sardar Zaidi, Ajay K Sharma, Rupali Sharma, AOR, Dileep Pathak, Shivaji M. Jadhav, AOR, Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR, Shantanu Sharma, Deeksha Gaur, Hit Lal, Raj Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents: Uttara Babbar, Sr. Advocate, Deeptakirti Verma, AOR, Neha Sharma, Tanmaya Agarwal, AOR, Aditi Agarwal, Muhammad Nomaan Khan, Jayesh Sharma, Astha Sharma, Advocates, Nikhil Jain, AOR.
Head Note:
Constitution OF iNDIA - Article 142 -
...
WA No. 682 OF 2025
Parties: Food Corporation Of India, Represented By Its Executive Director, Chennai & Others Versus P. Govindan
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Jose Kuriakose - SC, FCI, P.M Mohammed Shiraz, Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 73842,
...
Criminal Writ Petition No. 4463 of 2025
Parties: Santosh Dattatraya Bhingare & Others Versus State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sajid Ahmad Bagwan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Pankaj Deokar, APP.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 326, Section 324, Section 504, Section 506, Section 143, Section 147, Section 149 -
Case Referred:
Ahammad Mainuddin Shaikh Vs The State of Maharashtra and another - ((2013) 4 Bom CR (Cri) 559)
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-KOL 9328,
...
Civil Appeal No. Of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 13645 of 2023)
Parties: Union of India & Others Versus Ramdhani Prasad
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: ------- For the Respondent: ------
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 311(1) – Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 – Sections 6, 9 – Railway Protection Force Rules, 1959 – Rules 20, 43 – Schedules I and II – Removal from Service – Appointing Authority – Rakshak – Appeal – Respondent was removed from service by the Adjutant after unauthorised absence – High Court held removal invalid on the ground that the Adjutant was subordinate to the Commandan...
A. No. 1060 of 2016 & O.P. No. 583 of 2009
Parties: M/s. Alliance Projects, Chennai Versus P. Ramamoorthy & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS) JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M/s. E. Hariharan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, A. Veerappa, R2, K. Govi Ganesan, R5, C. Anbarasu, Advocates.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 92(1) (h) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (4) TLNJ 33,
...
M.A.C.M.A. No. 2958 of 2012
Parties: Mamidi Kishan Reddy Versus O. Kanakaiah & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Sarala Mahender Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondents: - - - -
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act – Section 166 – Motor Accident Claim – Delay in FIR – Proof of Accident – Non-examination of Eyewitness – Standard of Proof – Claimant sustained grievous injuries in road traffic accident – Tribunal dismissed claim primarily for delay in lodging FIR and failure to examine independent eyewitness – Documentary evidence including FIR, injury certificate, medical records and charge sheet supported occurrence of...