W.P. No. 17732 of 2026 & W.M.P. Nos. 19057 & 19058 of 2026
Parties: A. Senthilkumar Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: N.L. Rajah, Senior Counsel, K.R. Arun Shabari, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, A. Edwin Prabakar, State Government Pleader, R3, B. Anand, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
First Appeal No. 636 of 2000
Parties: Kalinoonisa Versus Arif Azizkhan (deleted) & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Ketki Gokhale, instructed by A.M. Gokhale, Advocates. For the Respondents: R3, Rajesh Ranglani, instructed by Minal Chandnani, Advocates.
Head Note:
Subject
...
Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 8298 of 2024 & Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos. 5646 & 5647 of 2024\r\n
Parties: T. Lenin & Others Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by. the Inspector of Police, Thanjavur & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: T.K. Gopalan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, M. Sakthikumar, Government Advocate(Crl.Side), R2, A. Arunprasad, Advocate.
Head Note:
BNSS, 2023 - Section 528 -
...
Crl. O.P.(MD). No. 1159 of 2026 & Crl. M.P.(MD). No. 1219 of 2026
Parties: Yashmin Nushrath Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: N. Mohan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, M. Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. side).
Head Note:
BNSS, 2023 - Section 528 -
...
SA.(MD). No. 731 of 2024 & CMP. (MD). No. 17730 of 2024
Parties: Subashini Versus P. Selvaraj & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: C. Jeyaprakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, D. Shanmugaraja Sethupathy, Advocate, R2, Unserved, R3 & R4, No Appearance.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 100 -
...
T.C.(A) No. 1455 of 2008
Parties: Tata International Limited, Mumbai Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, Income Tax Department, Vellore
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED
Advocates: For the Appellant: R. Harshvardan for Arunkarthik Mohan & Suhrith Parthasarathy, Advocates. For the Respondent: Prabhu Mukunth Arunkumar, Sr.Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 260A -
...
Writ Petition Nos. 203781, 203783, 203801 Of 2024, 201997, 20230 to 20232, 202035, 20237, 202984 of 2025 (LA-RES) & etc.,
Parties: Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Limited, Represented By Its, Managing Director, Bengaluru & Others Versus The Addl.Special Land Acquisition Officer, UKP, Almatti & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Gourish S. Khashampur, K.S. Rakshith, K.B. Monesh Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, Malhara Rao, AAG, M. Sheshadri Jaishankar, AGA, R5, Sunil S. Chaudhari, Gururaj Gopal Rao, Harshavardhan Malipatil, R3, R5, R8 to R11, A.M. Shodhan Babu, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Articles 226 & 227 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KHC-K 3818,
...
Writ Appeal No. 927 of 2023 (GM-KEB)
Parties: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Bengaluru & Another Versus M/s. Shamanur Sugars Limited, Davangere & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA \r\n
Advocates: For the Appellants: S. Sriranga, Senior Advocate, Sumana Naganand, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Shridhar Prabhu, R2, Pradeep Nayak, Advocates.
Head Note:
Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Section 4 -
...
Civil Revision Petition No. 311 of 2026
Parties: Petitioner Versus Respondent
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ---- For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 141 and 227 – Family Courts Act, 1984 – Section 11 – Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Section 23(2) – Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules for Video Conferencing for Courts, 2023 – Rule 3(i) – Matrimonial Proceedings – Reconciliation Proceedings – Video Conferencing – Civil Revision Petition filed challenging rejection of application seeking permission for husband residing in Texas, USA to pa...
Appeal (CAD) No. 6 of 2024
Parties: Chennai Port Authority, Rep. by its Chairman, Chennai & Others Versus J. Chandrasekaran Proprietor M/s. Jeyavani Ice Unit, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU
Advocates: For Appellants: ARL. Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor General of India Assisted by S. Haja Mohideen Gisthi, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, V. Manohar, Caveator, Sharath Chandran, Amicus Curiae.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 96 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (2) LW 766,
...