Writ Petition No. 9558 of 2019
Parties: Bora Narayanamma Versus Union Of India, Represented By General Manager, East Coast Railway, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rama Mohan Rao Banda, Advocate. For the Respondents: Poluri Prabhakar Rao, Deputy Solicitor General Of India.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 14, 21, 226 – Compassionate Appointment – Delay – Medical De-categorization – Financial Distress – Railway Board Orders – Judicial Review – Writ Petition – Petitioner challenged Tribunal order rejecting compassionate appointment on ground of delay – Held, application made in 2006 had been recommended after enquiry showing financial distress, but competent authority rejected it without pr...
W.A.No. 3704 of 2025
Parties: John Wilson Azariah Versus The Director of School Education DPI Compound, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED
Advocates: For the Appellant: S.N. Ravichandran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R4, J.C. Durairaj, Additional Government Pleader.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
...
Criminal Appeal No. 444 of 2017 (A)
Parties: State Of Karnataka By Upparpet Police Station Bengaluru Represented By State Public Prosecutor, Bengaluru Versus Madan Mohan Raj @ Madan Raj @ Madan @ Daniel D souza @ Rajender
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. VENKATESH NAIK
Advocates: For the Appellant: Rashmi Jadhav, Additional S.P.P. For the Respondent: K.N. Chandrappa, Advocate.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 378 – Circumstantial Evidence – Last Seen Theory – Recovery – Appeal against Acquittal.
Court Held – Appeal dismissed – Acquittal upheld – Prosecution failed to establish complete chain of circumstantial evidence – Mere “last seen” evidence insufficient without corroborative links – K...
Regular First Appeal No. 2925 of 2025
Parties: Gopalkrishna S. Bakale & Another Versus Ganapathi C. Bakale & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Advocates: For the Appellants: S. Gunashekar, Advocate. For the Respondents: S. Gajendra, Advocate.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Sections 96, 151 – Order XXI Rule 97 – Execution Proceedings – Obstruction by Third Party – Scope of Enquiry – Jural Relationship – Finality of Decree – Appeal by objectors challenging rejection of application resisting execution of eviction decree – Claim of joint family ownership and independent possession – Pending partition suit relied upon – Executing Court rejected objections ...
Criminal Revision Case No. 687 of 2008
Parties: Telugu Gani Venkata Ramudu Versus The State of AP Rep By PP, And State , Rep By Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor (AP).
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 397/Section 401 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) ALT(Cri) 396,
...
CRP. No. 1435 of 2023 & CMP. No. 9639 of 2023
Parties: Jayabalan (Deceased) & Others Versus Dr. Ramajayam & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates: For the Petitioners: A. Muthukumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R6, K.A. Mariappan, Advocate, R7 & R8, Served - No Appearance.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 227 -
Comparative Citations:
2026 MHC 65, 2026 (2) CTC 162,
...
Writ Petition No. 2738 of 2025
Parties: Anapana Simhachalam Versus The State Of AP, Rep By Its Secretary Consumer Affairs And Civil Supplies Department, Amaravathi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M. Sapthagiri, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP For Revenue, GP For Civil Supplies.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 AIR(AP) 55,
...
S.A. No. 34 of 2019
Parties: Chandra Mani Devi & Another Versus Ashok Bhagat & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Advocates: For the Appellants: Vibhor Mayank, Advocate. For the Respondents: ---
Head Note:
S.A. (MD) No. 314 of 2018
Parties: Shanmugasundaram Versus Mangayarkarasi & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: V.K. Vijayaragavan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, S. Alagarsamy, Advocate, R2, No appearance.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 100 -...
Criminal Revision Case No. 12 of 2026
Parties: Nallabelli Anjibabu Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati.
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Eluru Sesha Mahesh Babu, Advocate. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 21 -...