| |
CDJ 2026 MHC 2592
|
| Court : High Court of Judicature at Madras |
| Case No : W.P. No. 15657 of 2025 & W.M.P. No. 17705 of 2025 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN |
| Parties : Tvl. Anjaneya Textiles Mills, Represented by Its Karta Mahesh Babu Versus The State Tax Officer, Office of The Assistant Commissioner(ST), Office of The Commercial Tax Officer, Erode |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: J.R. Devanand, for M/s. R. Hemalatha, Advocates. For the Respondent: K. Vasanthamala, Government Advocate. |
| Date of Judgment : 20-02-2026 |
| Head Note :- |
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
|
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India
- Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017
2. Catch Words:
- limitation
- pre‑deposit
- remand
- show cause notice
- fresh order
3. Summary:
The writ petition under Article 226 challenges a GST order dated 26‑02‑2025. The petition was filed within the limitation period prescribed under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017. The petitioner, having not appeared at the show‑cause hearing, seeks quashing of the order and offers to pre‑deposit 10% of the disputed tax for a de novo adjudication. The court, with consent of both parties, does not find any reason to differ from earlier similar cases and remits the matter back to the revenue authority. The petitioner must deposit the stipulated amount within 30 days and file a reply to the show‑cause notice. Upon compliance, the bank attachment will be lifted and the authority will pass a fresh order on merits; otherwise, the petition stands dismissed as if rejected today. No costs were awarded.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed |
| Judgment :- |
|
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the Respondent herein in its Impugned Order passed by the Respondent in GSTIN 33AARHM5412M1ZV/2020-2021 dated 26.02.2025 along with the Form DRC-07 bearing Reference No.ZD3302252746874 dated 26.02.2025 for the period 2020-2021, and quash the same.)
1. Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 26.02.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 26.02.2025.
4. It is noticed that the present Writ Petition has been filed on 24.04.2025 i.e., within a period of limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order.
5. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that 80% of the disputed tax confirmed vide impugned order has been recovered and submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.
6. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.
7. Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 10% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.
8. Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
9. Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 25.11.2024 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated 26.02.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 25.11.2024.
10. Needless to state, any amount recovered from the Petitioner / paid by the Petitioner towards the tax liability confirmed vide impugned order shall be adjusted towards the aforesaid pre-deposit of 10% as ordered above. This will be however subject to verification by the Respondent.
11. In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.
12. It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.
13. In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
14. Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
15. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
|
| |