Writ Petition No. 14805 of 2024
Parties: Odugu Vishnu Murthy Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By Its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Thullur Mandal, Amaravati & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rambabu Koppineedi, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP For Panchayat Raj Rural Dev, E.V. Jagannadha Rao, SC, N. Srihari, Standing Counsel, GP For Finance Planning.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Civil Revision Petition Nos. 3027, 3033 & 2734 of 2025
Parties: V. Nagaraju Versus A. Chinnamma Died
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M.R.K. Chakravarthy, Advocate. For the Respondents: S. Nagaraju, Kale Vijaya Raju, Advocates.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 151 -
...
Civil Revision Petition No. 2827 of 2024
Parties: Swarna Surya Prakasa Rao(Died) & others Versus Yendreddy Pushpavathi & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Venkata Durga Rao Anantha, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 151 -
...
Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 819 of 2025
Parties: Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Company, Represented By Itsmanager (Claims), Visakhapatnam Versus Dontala Govinda Rao & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Koraganti Sreenivasarao, Advocate. For the Respondents: G. Ramesh Babu, Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Order 41 -
...
Crl. M.P. Nos. 6079, 6082 & 6084 of 2026 & Crl. A. No. 407 of 2026
Parties: Prasanna & Others Versus The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Chengalpattu
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: R. Varun Vignesh, Advocate. For the Respondent: J.R. Archana, Government Advocate (Criminal Side).
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 430(1) -
...
W.P.(MD). No. 5661 of 2026 & W.M.P.(MD). Nos. 4714 to 4716 of 2026
Parties: M. Neelavathi Versus The Assistant Commissioner, The Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowment Department, Thanjavur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: V. Kishore Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, M. Sarangan, Additional Government Pleader, R3, M. Suresh, R4, AN. Ramanathan, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
WP(C) No. 28533 of 2025
Parties: J. Mary Help John David & Others Versus J.V. Anoop & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Roy Pallikoodam, R. Prasanth Kumar, R. Kalesh, .K.K. Murukesan, P. Jayaprakash (Alappuzha), Jayaprakash Narayanan, V.S. Moosakutty, K. Rajan, Advocates. For the Respondents: J.S. Shyni Das, M.U. Vijayalakshmi, Appu Ajith, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Criminal Revision Application No. 130 of 2015
Parties: Kanhaiyalal Versus State of Maharashtra, through P.S. Saoner, Nagpur
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE
Advocates: For the Applicant: Amol Mardikar, Advocate. For the Respondent: M.A. Barabde, APP.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 409 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-NAG 5535,
...
Writ Petition No. 3825 of 2025
Parties: Nune Vishnu Versus The State of Telangana & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Venkateshwarlu Dasari, Advocate. For the Respondents: ----------
Head Note:
National Highways Act, 1956 - Section 3G(5) -
...
Criminal Appeal No. 1782 of 2026 (Arising Out Of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 11080 of 2022)
Parties: Gautam Satnami Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 – The Appeal is filed against the High Court order- where the High Court upheld the Trial Court conviction order - The Trial Court had convicted the sole appellant, who was accused No. 1, under Section 302 of IPC. The Appellant contended that the prosecution did not prove the charge under Section 302 of the IPC beyond reasonable doubt and the conviction is totally unsustainable in law. While the accused No. 2 was acquitted on the ...