logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 SC 1592 My Notes print Preview print print
Court : Supreme Court of India
Case No : Petition For Special Leave To Appeal (C) No. 21645 of 2024 with Writ Petition (C) No. 808 of 2024
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Parties : Jasleen Kaur & Another Versus State of Punjab & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioners: ----- For the Respondents: -----
Date of Judgment : 09-10-2026
Head Note :-
Subject
Judgment :-

SLP(C) No.21645/2024

1. The petitioner, Jasleen Kaur, was permitted to complete her internship by virtue of order passed by this Court dated 9.1.2026.

2. We are informed that she would be completing her internship by January, 2027.

3. Subject to her successful completion of the internship, the degree may be conferred on her.

4. In view of the aforesaid, nothing is required to be looked into the matter. It is needless to clarify that in the peculiar facts of the matter, more particularly, keeping in mind the interest of the student we had granted this consideration.

5. The Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly.

6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

WRIT PETITION (C) No. 808 OF 2024

7. We heard Mr. Masoom K. Shah, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

8. The learned counsel brought to our notice that, by order dated 09.01.2026, the petitioner was permitted to appear in the supplementary examination which was to commence from 16.1.2026.

9. The petitioner on the strength of the order passed by this Court referred to above did appear in the examination. However, according to Mr. Shah, the petitioner was unable to clear the examination. It appears that the petitioner has failed in the examination.

10. At this stage, the learned counsel brought to our notice a letter issued by the Dental Council of India dated 23.2.2026 as regards two year relaxations to the students admitted in BDS Course for the Academic Session 2015-2016.

11. In the aforesaid context, it shall be open for the petitioner to prefer an appropriate representation addressed to the competent authority.

12. With the aforesaid, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

13. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

 
  CDJLawJournal