CRL.A(J) No. 53 of 2024
Parties: Sujit Tanti, Tripura, Represented by her mother, Saraswati Tanti, Khowai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Debesh Ch. Roy, Abhijit Gon Chowdhury, Advocates. For the Respondent: R. Datta, Public Prosecutor, R. Saha, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374 -
...
W.P. (S) No. 830, 1575 of 2025
Parties: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Through Its Managing Director, Sanchar Bhawan, New Delhi & Others Versus Ranju Prasad & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Mayank Mridul, Amish Lal, Sahibjot Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents: Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate, Kiran Shushma Khoya, CGC, Shalini, Radha Krishna Gupta, Advocates.
Head Note:
The Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Section 14 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 JHHC 1418,
...
W.P. (C) No. 302 of 2026
Parties: Sangeetha Lakshmana Versus Registrar General, High Court of Kerala, Cochin & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sangeetha Lakshmana, (Party-In-Person). For the Respondents: R1, G. Harikumar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citations:
2026 KER 5508, 2026 (1) KLT 438,
...
W.P. No. 30277 of 2025 & W.M.P. Nos. 33967 & 33968 of 2025
Parties: Dr. Annamalai Alagappan Versus The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Alagu Swaminathan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, M. Sureshkumar, AAG, S. Gopinathan, R4, No appearance, R5, S.M. Loganathan, G. Saravanakumar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 227 -
...
Civil Appeal No. of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. of 2026 (Arising out of Diary No. 37381 of 2024)
Parties: V. Anima Malar Versus Versus S. Aadhavan & Others\r\n
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: ------
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 INSC 108,
...
WP No. 3830 of 2017
Parties: P. Palani Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Finance (Pension) Department, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Raju, For M/s. A.R. Nixon, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, M. Jayanthy, AGP.
Head Note:
(Prayer: Declaring that the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Mu.Mu. No.7200/ 2016/Vu1 dated 22.12.2016 based on the Communication of the 3rd respondent dated 2.12.2016 in Na.Ka. No.4266/ A2/2016 is null and void and thereby consequently direct the respondents to pay a sum of Rs.1,06,200/- spent by the petitioner towards Medical Expenses with 18% interest until the date of payment.)
1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 22.12.2016 bearing No.Mu.Ma.No.7200/2016/Vu...
Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 327 Of 2025
Parties: Petitioner Versus Respondent
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: --- For the Respondent: ---
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 24 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (2) ALT 305,
...
W.P. No. 35138 of 2019
Parties: A. Kannan Versus The Managing Director, M/s. Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P.R. Thiruneelankandan, Advocate. For the Respondent: L. Sathish, Advocate.
Head Note:
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Section 11A – Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226, 311 – Domestic Enquiry – Supply of enquiry report – Second show cause notice – Principles of natural justice – Dismissal from service – Compensation in lieu of reinstatement – Labour Court erred in holding domestic enquiry fair and proper without furnishing enquiry report or issuing second show cause notice to workm...
Arbitration O.P.(Com.Div.). No. 602 of 2022
Parties: M/s. Muthu Construction - Salem, Rep.by its Proprietor Kannan, Namakkal Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Principal Chief Engineer, Southern Railway, through DEN/ W/Salem, Office of the Divisional Railway Manager, Salem
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sharath Chandran, Advocate. For the Respondent: V.J. Latha, SCGSC.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 18, 28(3), 34(2)(b), 34(2A) – Setting aside arbitral award – Patent illegality – Bias – Interpretation of contract terms – Majority arbitral award rejecting contractor’s claim regarding measurement and payment based on “per track metre” set aside – Arbitral Tribunal adopted a different yardstick for certain items by relying on an alleged “mutual un...
Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 484 of 2025
Parties: M/S. Forwood Rep by its Authorized Signatory Swedan Versus M/s Aman Global Rep by its proprietor Shalini Dubey Tuticorin & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Appellant: M/S. J. Jeya Sabare Eswaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, A.V. Arun, R3, P. Raja, Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11(6) -
...