CRL.A. No. 328 of 2018
Parties: Alauddin @ Shakeel Versus State
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Sunita Arora, Advocate. For the Respondent: Utkarsh, APP, Luv Manan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 -...
C.R.P. No. 788 of 2025 & C.M.P. No. 4629 of 2025
Parties: Mohammed Hafiz & Others Versus Subatra Ajmalkhan @ Afroz
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR
Advocates: For the Petitioners: R. Lakshmi Narasimhan, Advocate. For the Respondent: M/s. S.S. Jhothivani, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 227 -
...
CRL. A. (MD) No. 697 of 2022
Parties: Prabhakaran Versus State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Jeyamangalam Police Station, Theni & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN & THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
Advocates: For the Appellant: J. Lawrance, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, T. Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, R2, M.U. Mohamed Aslam, R3, M. Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy, Advocates.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 372 -
...
A.S No. 582 of 2023 & C.M.P. No. 19645 of 2023
Parties: A.S. Vetrivel Versus K. Palanisamy & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates: For the Appellant: K.P. Prabhuraj for A.K. Mylsamy & Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, K. Govi Ganesan, R3, K. Sudhakar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 92 (Proviso) – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Specific Performance – Readiness and Willingness – Loan vs Sale Agreement – Alternative Relief – Appeal against trial court decree refusing specific performance and granting refund of ₹50 lakhs with interest – Plaintiff relied on registered sale agreement and payment of substantial advance – Defendants contended transaction was loan secured b...
Writ Petition Nos. 19491, 19495 of 2021 (GM-KSR) c/w Writ Petition No. 14618 of 2022 (Gm-Res), Writ Petition Nos. 23189, 23244 2022 (GM-KSR)
Parties: N. Yogesh & Another Versus State of Karnataka Represented By Its Principal Secretary Department Of Co-Operation, Bengaluru & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: B. Sukanya Baliga, AGA, B.P. Radha, AGA, R. Padmanabha, S.R. Harish Kumar, Sumanth Kumar S. Patil, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 & Article 227 - Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 - Section 25, Section 26, Section 27, Section 27A, Section 28 and Section 29 - Society and its education institutions faced certain financial crises - mother of petitioner no.1 had requested him to take over the management of the institution which he did and revived the Society's fortune converting a loss making entity into a profit making entity - mother of petitioner no.1 had...
Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) No. 503 of 2022 & Application No. 4187 of 2025
Parties: RPN Engineers Chennai Private Limited, represented by its Authorized Signatory, P.K. Luqmman Basha, Chennai Versus The General Manager, Integral Coach Factory, Chennai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: J. Srinivasa Mohan for M/s. TVJ Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: K.S. Jeyaganesan, Senior Panel Counsel.
Head Note:
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 -
Comparative Citations:
2026 MHC 217, 2026 (1) LW 401, 2026 (2) CTC 410,
...
W.A.(MD) No. 1105 of 2024 & C.M.P.(MD) No. 8324 of 2024
Parties: The Secretary to the Government, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Chennai & Others Versus V. Thiraviam Pillai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General assisted by D. Sasi Kumar, Additional Government Pleader. For the Respondent: S. Vasik Ali, Advocate.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
...
Arbitration O.P. (Com. Div.). No. 603 of 2022
Parties: M/s. Muthu Construction - Salem, Rep. by its Proprietor Kannan, Namakkal Versus Union of India, Rep. by its Principal Chief Engineer, Southern Railway, through DEN/ W/Salem, Office of the Divisional Railway Manager, Salem
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sharath Chandran, Advocate. For the Respondent: V.J. Latha, SCGSC.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 18, 28(3), 34(2)(b), 34(2A) – Setting aside arbitral award – Patent illegality – Interpretation of contract terms – Bias in arbitral tribunal – Court further found that allegations of bias raised by a dissenting arbitrator in a connected arbitration involving the same tribunal members raised a reasonable apprehension of bias, which vitiates the entire award.
Court Held – Original...
W.P. No. 1754 of 2026 & W.M.P. Nos. 1834, 1835 & 1837 of 2026
Parties: K.K.R. Wiring Harness, Represented by its Partner, N. Murali, Krishnagiri Versus State Tax Officer, Hosur (South) - III Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Building, Hosur & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: A. Divya, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, T.N.C. Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader, R2, C. Mohan, A. Rexy Josephine Mary for M/s. King & Partridge, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
W.P. No. 22541 of 2017 & W.M.P. Nos. 23670 of 2017 & 38206 of 2025
Parties: P. Aldrin Selvapandiayan Versus The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Amardeep for V. Antony Elangovan Raj, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R4, P. Raja Rajeswari, Government Advocate, R5, G. Saranya, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...