A.S. No. 40 of 2026 & C.M.P. No. 1043 of 2026
Parties: S. Ramasamy Versus R. Murugan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates: For the Appellant: M/s. R. Venkatesulu, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 96 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 442,
...
Arbitration O.P.(Com.Div.). No. 417 of 2023
Parties: M/s. Angel One Limited, Rep. by Senior Manager, Legal & Compliance, Mumbai, Versus S.X.J. Vasan
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G. Surya Narayanan, Jayasudha Surya Narayanan, Advocates. For the Respondent: B. Arvind Srevatsa, Advocate.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 34, 31(7)(a) – Challenge to Arbitral Award – Scope of Interference – Margin Trading – Squaring Off of Securities – Petitioner (stock broker) challenged arbitral award directing payment of ₹48,77,111/- with interest for illegal squaring off of client’s securities – Issue whether award suffers from perversity or patent illegality.
Court Held – Petition dismissed &ndas...
CMA. (TM). No. 16 of 2025
Parties: Perundurai Chennimalai Gounder Duraisamy, Versus The Registrar of Trade Marks Office of the Trade Mark Registry IP Office Building, Chennai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Diwakar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, C. Samivel, Senior Panel-Central Government Standing Counsel, R2, M.K. Miglani, Advocate.
Head Note:
Trade Marks Act, 1999 – Sections 21(2), 91 – Trademark Registration – Cancellation – Opposition – Abandonment – Appeal against order treating application as abandoned – Unilateral cancellation of registered trademark without notice – Restoration of application and entertaining opposition – Violation of statutory procedure and principles of natural justice.
Court Held – Appeal allowed – Unilateral...
W.A. No. 94 of 2026 & C.M.P. No. 821 of 2026
Parties: Central Board of Film Certification Films Division Complex, Phase-I Building, Mumbai & Another Versus KVN Productions LLP Rep. by its Authorized Signatory, Venkata Narayana Konanki Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: AR.L. Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor General, A.R. Sakthivel Senior Panel Counsel. For the Respondent: Sathish Parasaran, Senior Counsel, Pradeep Kumar Rai, Senior Counsel, Vijayan Subramanian, Advocate.
Head Note:
Cinematograph (Certification) Rules, 2024 – Rules 25, 27(1), 37(6) – Writ Jurisdiction – Maintainability – Natural Justice – Film Certification – Single Judge directed issuance of certification to film “Jana Nayagan” and set aside decision referring film to Revising Committee – Appeal filed contending violation of natural justice and absence of challenge to decision of Chairperson referring film to Revising Committee – ...
H.C.P. (MD) No. 904 of 2025
Parties: Subbulakhsmi Versus State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN & THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Vinoth Bharathi, Advocate. For the Respondents: T. Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
The Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Writ Petition No. 32774 of 2025
Parties: M/s. The A.P. High Court Cooperative Credit Society Limited Versus The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, Advocate. For the Respondent: K Sudhakar Reddy, (Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax).
Head Note:
Subject
...
Civil Appeal No. of 2026 [@ S.L.P. (Civil) No. 9970 of 2023]
Parties: M/s. Premium Transmission Private Limited Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Sections 2(k), 10, 12 – Contract Labour (Abolition & Regulation) Act, 1970 – Section 10 – Industrial Dispute – Apprehended Dispute – Conciliation Proceedings – Reference to Industrial Court – Employer-Employee Relationship – Sham Contract – Preliminary Objection – Civil Appeal – Management challenged reference of industrial dispute contending absence of prior charter of de...
Civil Appeal No… of 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 7061 of 2025)
Parties: Niraj Jain Versus Competent Authority-cum-Additional Collector, Jagdalpur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: -----. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Railways Act, 1989 - Sub-section (6) of Section 20-F -
Comparative Citations:
2026 INSC 86, 2026 AIR(SC) 662,
...
R/Criminal Misc.Application (For Regular Bail - Before Chargesheet) No. 1906 Of 2026
Parties: Pradip Manubhai Jethvani Versus State Of Gujarat
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Advocates: For the Applicant: N.R. Kodekar(5020), Advocate. For the Respondent: Jay Mehta, APP.
Head Note:
Gujarat Prohibition Act - Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 81 & 98(2) -
...
Civil Appeal No.. of 2026 (@ Special Leave Petition (C) No. 7061 of 2025)
Parties: Niraj Jain Versus Competent Authority-Cum-Additional Collector, Jagdalpur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: -------
Head Note:
Railways Act, 1989 - Sub-section (6) of Section 20-F -
...