1. Sri Vighnesh Asawa, learned counsel appears for Sri A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel for petitioner. Sri K. Sudhakar Reddy, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department appears for respondents.

2. This Writ Petition is filed with the following prayer:

               “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction declaring that order passed by the 1st Respondent, dated 26.06.2025, bearing DIN.: ITBA/COM/F/17/2025-26/1077828901(1) for the Assessment Year 2020-21, in rejecting the application, filed by the Petitioner; seeking condonation of delay in filing its Return of Income; as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void-ab-initio, violative of the principles of natural justice, apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India & the Income Tax Act, 1961, and to consequently set aside the same, after declaring that the same is in violation of Circular No.13 of 2023, dated 26.07.2023, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Income Tax Department has already condoned the delay in filing the petitioner’s Return of Income. As such, the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.