Criminal Appeal No. 632 of 2004
Parties: Maharudrappa & Another Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. Police Station, Latur
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: Mahesh P. Kale, Advocate. For the Respondent: B.B. Gunjal, APP.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 307 -
Cases Referred:
Suresh and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra - [MANU/SC/1947/2009]
Ishwar Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh - [(2008) 15 SCC 667]
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 38503,
...
Crl. A. No. 888 of 2026
Parties: S. Raj Kamal Versus The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Somangalam Police Station, Kancheepuram
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Raj Kamal, Party-in-Person. For the Respondent: Sharada Vivek, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), M. Arul Raj, Advocate.
Head Note:
Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 14A -
...
CRL. OP. No. 10134 of 2026 & CRL. MP. No. 7229 of 2026
Parties: M. Purushothaman & Others Versus The State Rep. By Its The Inspector of Police, Nemili Police Station, Ranipet & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: C. Prakasam, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, M. Dinesh, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), R2, No Appearance.
Head Note:
BNSS - Section 528 -
...
Writ Petition No. 25260 of 2026
Parties: Obulam Pratap Reddy Versus M/s. Sri Lakshmikantha Spinners Limited (In Liquidation) & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Avinash Desai, learned Senior Counsel representing V. Murali Manohar, learned counsel. For the Respondents: R1, Bommera Rahul Kumar, learned counsel, R2, V.V.S.N. Raju, learned counsel, R3, Koushik Kanduri, learned counsel.
Head Note:
Companies Act, 2013 - Section 230 -
Case Referred:
Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors ((2020) 8 SCC 531)
...
Writ Petition No.22880 of 2026
Parties: Nalla Radha Ramana Versus The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Krishnaveni Valavala, learned counsel representing Jakkamsetti Ravindra, learned counsel. For the Respondents: S. Pradeep Kumar, learned Government Pleader attached to the Office of learned Additional Advocate General, R5, R.K.G. Bhatia, learned counsel.
Head Note:
Subject
...
CRL.A NO. 1118 OF 2022
Parties: XXXXXXXXXXX Versus State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Advocates: For the Appellant: P. Mohamed Sabah, Libin Stanley, Saipooja, Sadik Ismayil, M. Mahin Hamza, R. Gayathri, Advocates. For the Respondent: Sai Pooja, Advocate, P.K. Sajeev, Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
POCSO Act - Sections 3(a) r/w 4, 5(1) and (n) r/w 6 -
Case Referred:
In Royson v. State of Kerala (2017 KHC 1056)
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 63641,
...
WA. Nos. 1434 & 528 of 2026 & CMP. Nos. 5127 & 13239 of 2026
Parties: S. Alexander Versus The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu Tourism, Culture & Religious Endowments Department, Secretriat, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNASWAMY GOVINDARAJAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Ramachandran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, A.R. Suresh, Special Government Pleader, R4 to R7, Given-up vide EB, R2 & R3, No Appearance.
Head Note:
Subject
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 3378,
...
Criminal Petition No. 6081 of 2026
Parties: Sirigiri Ramesh Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Thandava Yogesh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 482 -
...
Writ Petition No. 11340 of 2022
Parties: Mandava Venkata Sreedhar Versus The Apgenco, Rep. By Its Managing Director, Hyderabad & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G.V. Shivaji, Advocate. For the Respondent: Nagaraju Naguru, K. Krishnabushan Chowdary, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
First Appeal No. 1311 of 2025
Parties: Rekha Versus Union of India, Through General Manager, Central Railway, Mumbai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Advocates: For the Appellant: R.G. Bagul, Advocate. For the Respondent: N.G. Chaubey, Advocate.
Head Note:
Railways Act - Section 2(29) -
Case Referred:
Union of India V/s Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar and Others, - (2008(9) SCC 527)
Jameela and Others V/s Union of India, - (2010) 12 Supreme Court Cases 443)<...