W.P. (CR) No. 50 of 2026
Parties: Deepika Hembram, represented through her natural guardian, Anita Hembram & Others Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Md. Shadab Ansari, Advocate. For the Respondents: Amrita Banerjee, AC to G.P.-1.
Head Note:
The Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Section 36AC -
...
Civil Appeal No. of 2026 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 28934 of 2025)
Parties: Mohtashem Billah Malik Versus Sana Aftab
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondent: ------
Head Note:
Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 - Section 25 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 AIR(SC) 707,
...
Civil Appeal Nos. 753, 754 of 2026 (@ SLP (C) Nos. 8299, 8331 of 2021)
Parties: M/s Eminent Colonizers Private Limited Versus Rajasthan Housing Board & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondent: ------
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 7, 11, 16, 34 – Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 – Section 11(6A), Section 26 – Res Judicata vs Precedent – Validity of Arbitration Clause – Jurisdiction of Section 34 Court – Standing Committee Clause – Civil Appeals – Appeals challenged High Court judgments affirming Commercial Court orders setting aside arbitral awards on ground that Clause 23 of contract ...
Criminal Revision Case No. 1971 of 2017
Parties: Konajam Rajasekhar @ Sekhar (A1) Krishna Dt & Another Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep PP, rep., by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana & the State of Andhra Pradesh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: O. Kailashnath Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondent: -----.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 397 & Section 401 -
...
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 187 of 2020
Parties: Lajendra Singh @ Lali Versus State, Through PP
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR SHARMA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Vineet Jain, Sr. Advocate with Praveen Vyas, Advocate. For the Respondent: Rajesh Bhati, PP, NL Joshi, Kirti Pareek, Advocates.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 228A -
Comparative Citation:
2026 RJ-JD 5728,
...
APO-IPD. No. 1 of 2026 & IA. No. GA-Com. 1 of 2025
Parties: Parul Ruparella & Another Versus Camme Wang & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
Advocates: For the Appellants: Ranjan Bachawat, Rudraman Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocates, Sourajit Dasgupta, Dhruv Chaddha, Victor Dutta, Sagnik Bose, Advocates. For the Respondents: Suvasish Sengupta, Syed E. Huda, Pratiksha Shama, Anwesha Guha Ray, Nabeela Akbar, Sahadat Ali, Himadri Roy, Deepesh Sharma, Amrin Khatoon, Advocates.
Head Note:
Subject
...
Criminal Appeal No(s). of 2026 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 19385 of 2025)
Parties: Gulabkali Versus Aashish Gautam @ Arvind Kumar
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. ANJARIA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Subject
...
W.P.(C). No. 6765 of 2004, CM APPL. No. 42096 of 2016
Parties: Ashok Hotel (A Unit of ITDC), New Delhi Versus Mukesh Kumar
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ravi Sikri, Sr. Advocate, Deepak Yadav, Arun Sankal, Nishant Goyal, Advocates. For the Respondent: Vivek Kumar Tandon, Laxmi Gupta, Pooja Giri, Ritu Rajput, Advocates.
Head Note:
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – Sections 25F, 17B – Articles 226 & 227 of Constitution of India – Illegal Retrenchment – Completion of 240 Days – Daily-Wage Worker – Adverse Inference for Non-production of Records – Reinstatement with Back Wages – Whether Automatic – Long Lapse of Time – Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement.
Court Held – Writ Petition Allowed in Part; Award Modified – ...
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 29260 of 2019
Parties: N. Rajaram Versus R. Murali & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: ------
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 9 Rule 13 -
...
Civil Appeal No. 6936 of 2023
Parties: M/s. Kabra & Associates & Others Versus Rekha Rajkumar Hemdev & Others\r\n
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: ------ For the Respondents: ------
Head Note:
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Section 3 -
...