WA. No. 363 of 2026 & CMP. No. 3193 of 2026
Parties: Noorul Ayin Versus The commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I), Chennai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS) JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Hari Radhakrishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents: M. Santhanaraman, Senior Panel Consel.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 652,
...
Writ Petition No. 1746 of 2026
Parties: Heena Qasim Phoplunkar Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Government Pleader, High Court (Appellate Side), Writ Cell, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. KARNIK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. MODAK
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Surel Shah, (Senior Advocate) a/w Saakshat Relekar, Kalpana Chate, Bharat Shinde, Govind Mundhe, Parth Wareraj Ware & Vinod Kendre i/b. Chate & Associates, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, Kavita N. Solunke, Addl.G.P. for R2, Pranali Kakade, Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 9657,
...
Criminal Petition No. 2719 of 2021
Parties: Chapa Devi Prasad Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of A.P., Amaravathi & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sivaprasad Reddy Venati, Advocate. For the Respondent: Tota Tejeswara Rao, Public Prosecutor (AP).
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Sections 482 -
...
A.S. No. 590 of 2025 & C.M.P. No. 10833 of 2025
Parties: P. Suresh Kumar & Others Versus B. Sujatha
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Advocates: For the Appellants: B. Arvind Srevatsa, Advocate. For the Respondent: K.S. Jeyaganeshan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 96 -
...
First Appeal No. 33 of 2013
Parties: Punjab National Bank Versus Shri Somvir Singh & Others\r\n
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.P. SAHI, PRESIDENT & THE HONOURABLE MR. BHARATKUMAR PANDYA, MEMBER
Advocates: For the Appellant: Ajay Shanker, Anuj Pandey, Advocates. For the Respondents: Jaskaran Singh, Advocate.
Head Note:
Subject
...
Civil Revision Petition No. 645 of 2024
Parties: A V Nagaraj & Others Versus Kantamma Since Dead By Her Lrs
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Phaniraj Kashyap., Advocate. For the Respondents: R2 to R5, G. B. Manjunatha., Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 115 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) KCCR 1015,
...
Appeal Suit No. 4145 of 2003
Parties: D. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy Versus D. Hanumanthamma & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Advocates: For the Appellant: K.L.N. Swamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Vivekananda Virupaksha, H. Prahalada Reddy, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 96 – Order XLI Rule 27, Section 151 – Additional evidence in appeal – DNA test – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 112 – Paternity dispute – Partition suit – Alleged marriage of plaintiff’s mother with Hanuma Reddy not proved by cogent evidence and documents relied upon such as voter list, affidavits, SSC certificate and letters were self-serving or unreliable &...
Writ Petition No. 4712 of 2026
Parties: G.V. Hanumanthu Rao Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary to Government, Forest, Environment, Amaravati & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. RAMESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: -----. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
RP No. 1355 of 2025
Parties: Mathew Idiculla & Others Versus Union of India, Represented By The Defence Secretary, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
Advocates: For the Review Petitioners: M.R. Sasi, N.P. Silpa, M.S Dharmya, Lejo Joseph George ,Kurian Maxie, Advocates. For the Respondents: O.M. Shalina, Deputy Solicitor General Of India.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 114, Order XLVII Rule 1 – Constitution of India – Article 226 – Review Jurisdiction – Delay and Laches – Continuing Cause of Action – Error Apparent - Review petition seeking recall of judgment dismissing original petition on ground of delay (14,528 days) – Petitioners contended continuing cause of action and recent knowledge of implementation of pay revision – Whether sufficient ground...
Civil Appeal Nos. 797, 798, 799 Of 2026 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 5431 of 2026) (Arising out of Diary No.3 0148 of 2022, Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 981, 3595 of 2023)
Parties: Priyanka Kumari & Others Versus The State of Bihar & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: ------ For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Chattisgarh Niji Kshetra Vishwavidyalaya Act, 2002 -
Comparative Citations:
2026 INSC 167, 2026 AIR(SC) 1500,
...