Cr. Appeal No. 116 of 2015
Parties: Vibhuti Versus Saurabh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Advocates: For the Appellant: Lalit Kumar Shamra, Advocate. For the Respondents: G.R. Palsra, Rakesh Kainthla, Advocates.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Sections 406, 418, 403, read with Section 504 and 506 -...
CRL. A (MD). No. 1214 of 2025
Parties: Balamurugan @ Balaji Versus State of Tamil Nadu rep.by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. MURALI SHANKAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: R. Balakrishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, B. Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side), R3, K. Sivabalan, Advocate.
Head Note:
SC/ST (PoA) Act - Section 14 A (2) -
Comparative Citation:
2025 (2) TLNJ(Cr) 519,...
C.M.A. Nos. 727 & 788 of 2020 & C.M.P. Nos. 4430 & 4993 of 2020
Parties: M/s. IFFCO-TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd., Coimbatore Versus P. Ramasamy & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: S. Arunkumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, S. Senthil, Advocate, R5, No appearance.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 - Section 173 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) TNMAC 54,
...
H.C.P. (MD). No. 1355 of 2025
Parties: M. Vijaya Versus State of Tamilnadu, rep. By its The Superintendent of Police, Madurai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. VIJAYAKUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Venkatesan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, A. Thiruvadi Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor, R3, A. Prasanna Rajadurai, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
CRL. A. No. 287 of 2025
Parties: Gurusamy @ Pandi Versus State, Represented By The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Villupuram & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: R. Thamaraiselvan for S. Kasirajan, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, A. Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor Assisted by M. Asifa Jhasneem, Advocate.
Head Note:
Bharathiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 415 -
...
Crl. O.P. Nos. 9679, 9652, 9651 & 9646 of 2025 & Crl. M.P. Nos. 6404, 6405, 6380, 6382, 6377, 6378, 6371 & 6372of 2025
Parties: S. Palanivel Rajan & Others Versus The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Central Bureau Investigation, Special Crime Branch, Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioners: T. Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for J. Madhumitha, Advocate. For the Respondent: K. Srinivasan, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528 -
...
C.M.A. No. 2914 of 2024 & C.M.P. No. 24328 of 2024
Parties: M. Selvamani @ Daisy Versus S. Premkumar
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: N. Nagu Sah, Advocate. For the Respondent: Kavitha Deenadayalan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Divorce - Desertion - Conduct of wife, and it’s relevancy - Filing of restitution of conjugal right perse will not lead to an inference that the petitioner is ready to resume the conjugal relationship- In the instant case, the Court noted that the continuous harassment by lodging frivolous complaints, the wilful withdrawal from the matrimonial home without any justification, are conduct that is sufficient to infer wilful desertion coupled with cruelty - Fu...
Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 4847 of 2024 & Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 3807 of 2024
Parties: P. Balamurugan & Another Versus The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Madurai City & Others
Coram: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: K. Balaji, Advocate. For the Respondent: R1, K. Sanjai Gandhi, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), R2, N. Saravanan, R4 to R6, S. Rajendrakumar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) LW(Crl) 180,
...
Second Appeal No. 550 of 2025
Parties: Venishetty Kavitha Versus Chintal Ramchander
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R. Madhavi Latha, Advocate. For the Respondent: ----------
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 100 – Perpetual Injunction – Proof of Possession – Identification of Property – Survey Number Discrepancy – Concurrent Findings of Fact – Second Appeal– Appellant challenged concurrent dismissal of suit seeking perpetual injunction in respect of land in Sy.No.248/4 admeasuring Ac.2.06½ Gts. – Trial Court and First Appellate Court held failure to prove possession and interference ...
CRL. A(MD). No. 569 of 2024 & CRL. M.P. (MD)No. 8091 of 2025
Parties: Aashik Mohamed @ Al Ashik Versus State represented by The Inspector of Police, Dindigul
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. MURALI SHANKAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: G. Karuppasamy Pandian for S. Vishnuvardhan, Advocates. For the Respondent: Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General assisted by C. Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
POCSO Act, 2012 – Sections 11(5), 12, 13, 14(1) – Information Technology Act, 2000 – Section 67(B)(a) – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 65B – Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 – Sections 164, 207, 222, 235(1), 313 – Electronic Evidence – Defective Charge – Hostile Testimony – Safe Custody of M.O. – Forensic Report – Child Witness – Appeal – Challenge to conviction under POCSO and IT Act.
C...