Writ Petition No. 9457 of 2017
Parties: V. Jyothi Versus State Of AP PRL SCY Revenue Amaravathi 2, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Stamps & Registration) Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Mahadeva Kanthrigala, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP For Assignment (AP), GP or Revenue (AP), Pavani Siva Kumar, Kopparthi Sumathi, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 Lab IC 805,
...
WP(C) No. 39141 of 2024
Parties: K. Gireesh & Others Versus State Of Kerala, Represented By The Addl. Chief Secretary To Government, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. NAGARESH
Advocates: For the Petitioners: K. Jaju Babu, (Sr.), M.U. Vijayalakshmi, Brijesh Mohan, Advocates. For the Respondents: S. Vishnu (Arikkattil), K. Gopalakrishna Kurup, Advocate General.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2025 KER 98978,
...
Appeal Suit Nos. 1412 Of 1998, 1479 Of 1999 & 769 of 2009
Parties: Palepu Appayamma (Died) & Others Versus Vatha Mohana & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: M.V. Suresh, A.K. Kishore Reddy, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 96 – Partition Suit – Self-acquired Property – Hindu Succession Act, 1956 – Class I Heirs – Will – Proof of Will – Sections 63, Indian Succession Act, 1925; Section 68, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Binding Nature of Sale Agreements – Appeals – Suit properties held to be self-acquisitions of deceased father who died intestate – Equal partition among Class I heirs –...
A.S. Nos. 708, 817 of 2010 & 579 of 2022 & C.M.P. No. 22118 of 2022
Parties: D. Singaravelu & Others Versus Vedavalli & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: A. Muthukumar, S. Hariharan, T. Thiyagarajan, P. Vennitharan, R. Natarajan, Advocates.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure.Code. - Section 96 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) CTC 17,
...
Arb. O.P. (COM.DIV.). No. 34 of 2021
Parties: M/s. Mediaone Global Entertainment Limited, Represented by its Director, Chennai Versus M/s. Vishnu Associates, Represented by its Managing Director M.S. Sreekanth, Mandya, Karnataka & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: T. Saikrishnan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Avinash Wadhwani, Advocate.
Head Note:
Arbitration 2021 & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) CTC 52,
...
CMA. (MD). Nos. 894 of 2012, 1416 to 1419 of 2013 & M.P. (MD). Nos. 1, 1, 1 & 1 of 2013
Parties: Anburaj Joeph & Another Versus Baskar & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: T. Selvakumaran, S. Srinivasa Raghavan, J.S. Murali, Advocates.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) TNMAC 107,
...
CRP. Nos. 4038 & 4200 of 2022 & CMP. No. 20951 of 2022
Parties: P. Janaki & Others Versus The Regional Transport Authority, Tiruvannamalai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: M. Palani, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, N. Muthuvel, Government Advocate (CS), R3, Radha Gopalan, Advocate, R2, No Appearance.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 227 -
Comparative Citations:
2025 MHC 2717, 2026 (1) CTC 288,
...
WP. Nos. 4136, 4141, 4142 & 4143 of 2021 & WMP. Nos. 32038, 32039 & 32041 of 2025 & 4720, 4721, 4723 & 4725 of 2021
Parties: The Commissioner, Corporation of Tiruppur Versus P. Murugesan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Silambanan, Senior Counsel, M/s. P. Shanthi, Advocate. For the Respondents: M/s. V. Porkodi, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Second Appeal No. 1211 of 2003
Parties: SMT. Boda Subbalaskhmi Versus Chodisetti Satyanarayana & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRINIVAS
Advocates: For the Appellant: A. Krishnam Raju, Advocate. For the Respondents: G. Vasantha Rayudu, Advocate.
Head Note:
WP(C). No. 689 of 2022
Parties: Khangembam Jayanta Singh & Others Versus The State of Manipur, Represented by the Principal Secretary/Commissioner/ Secretary (Revenue), Government of Manipur, New Secretariat Buidinng, Imphal & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Ng. Jotindra, Advocate. For the Respondents: S. Niranjan, Government Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 Lab IC 615,
...