CRL.M.C. No. 119 of 2026
Parties: Anil Ahluwalia Versus State NCT Of Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Paranjay Chopra, Advocate (VC). For the Respondents: Nawal Kishore Jha, APP.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 528 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 8191,
...
Writ Petition No. 2338 of 2018
Parties: Ramdas & Others Versus The Member Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Anil Giratkar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2 & R3, N.S. Autkar, AGP, R6, Kirti Satpute, Advocate.
Head Note:
Hyderabad Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Section 5 -
Case Referred:
Babu Hari Patil and anr. vs. Rama Amanda Jadhav (deceased) and ors. 2005 (1) ALL MR 329
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-NAG 12652,
...
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.). No. 181 of 2026
Parties: Liugong India Pvt Ltd Versus Crosslite Infra Pvt Ltd & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ankit Khatri, Advocate. For the Respondents: ------
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 8227,
...
Writ Petition No. 3956 of 2014
Parties: Shrikrishna Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Finance Department (Accounts & Treasuries), Mantralaya, Mumbai & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Shashibhushan Wahane, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, K.P. Marpakwar, AGP.
Head Note:
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 27 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-NAG 12632,
...
Criminal Appeal No. 381 of 2016
Parties: Sandip Eknath Dhangar Versus State of Maharashtra
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Advocates: For the Appellant: Joydeep Chatterji, Advocate. For the Respondent: V.V. Jahagirdar, APP.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 498-A -
Case Referred:
Harbans Singh v. State of U.P. and Others, - (1982) 2 SCC 101)
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 43078,
...
Writ Petition No. 1633 of 2023
Parties: Joshana Dilip Patil Versus The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, School Education & Sports Department, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: V.S. Panpatte, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, V.M. Kagne, AGP, R4 & R5, Sneha Patil, R6, L.V. Sangit, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 43176,
...
Criminal Appeal No. 378 of 2009
Parties: Sakharam Versus The State of Maharashtra
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: R.N. Dhorde, Senior Advocate a/w Harshavardhan Shinde, i/by Vikram R. Dhorde, Advocates. For the Respondent: M.A. Aher, APP.
Head Note:
Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 7 & Section 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) -
Case Referred:
Subash Parabat Sonvane vs. State of Gujarat, - (AIR 2003 SC 2169).
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 43412,
...
Writ Petition No. 12222 of 2025
Parties: Sushila Namdeo Malge & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Other Backward Classes Welfare Department, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Ashish T. Jadhavar, Advocate. For the Respondents: V.M. Kagne, AGP.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 43170,
...
Civil Appeal Nos. 8329-8336 of 2016
Parties: Dr. M.K. Ravi Varma & Others Versus National Institute of Technology & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
Advocates: For the Petitioners: ------ For the Respondents: -------
Head Note:
Service Law – Recovery of Excess Payment – Academic Grade Pay – Lecturers/Assistant Professors – Financial benefits extended and subsequently withdrawn on finding that requisite service was not completed – Appellants contended that recovery was impermissible in absence of misrepresentation or fraud – Undertaking furnished by appellants agreeing to recovery in case pay fixation was found erroneous – Whether recovery was justified.
Writ C No. 37559 of 2026
Parties: X (Minor Victim) Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE M. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GARIMA PRASHAD
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ayush Mittal, Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents: C.S.C.
Head Note:
Subject
Cases Referred:
X vs. Principal Secretary Health & Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another, - (2023) 9 SCC 433)
X vs. Union of India and another, - (2023 SCC Online SC 1338)
...