R/Special Civil Application Nos. 12943, 14559, 14552, 14562 of 2025
Parties: Noya Infrastructure LLP, Through Its Authorised Signatory Rajottam Sarbottam Ganguly & Others Versus Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S.N. Soparkar, Senior Advocate, Amir S. Pathan, Virat G. Popat(3710), Advocates, Mihir Joshi, Senior Advocate, Kunal Nanavati, Kaustubh Shrivastav, Nanavati, Associates(1375), Advocates. For the Respondents: Anurag Oza, Senior Standing Counsel, Pradip D. Bhate(1523), C.B. Gupta(1685), Advocates.
Head Note:
Subject...
W.P. No. 14561 of 2014 & M.P. Nos. 1 of 2015 & 2 of 2014
Parties: M. Namachivayam Versus The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Khadi & Village Industries Board, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: A. Immanuel, Advocate. For the Respondents: C. Rajakumar, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...
W.P. No. 46615 of 2025
Parties: Subasri Kumar Versus The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: V. Srimathi, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Mohamed Ghouse, R3, V. Sudha, Sr. Central Government Standing Counsel, R4, S. Udayakumar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) WLR 240,
...
Arbitration Petition No. 94 of 2024 with Interim Application No. 6876 of 2025
Parties: Sharekhan Limited Versus Darshini Shah
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Prathamesh Kamat with Ativ Patel, Viloma Shah & Viraj Raiyani i/b. M/s. AVP Partners, Advocates. For the Respondent: Saurabh Bacchawat with Rajesh Khandelwal i/b. M/s. Juris Link, Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 34, 28(3), 34(2B)(ii) – Patent Illegality – Conflict with Public Policy – NSE Circular dated 10.02.2020 – AMC Scheme – Brokerage Charges – Inactive Trading Account – Re-KYC Requirement – Whether failure to classify account as ‘inactive’ and obtain fresh KYC revives concessional brokerage under AMC Scheme – Whether Arbitral Award ignoring contractual terms lia...
H.C.P. (MD) No. 573 of 2025
Parties: Marimuthu Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition & Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN & THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P. Suresh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: T. Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
The Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
SA.(MD).No. 958 of 2010
Parties: Rajan Babu & Others Versus S. Soundarapandiyan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA
Advocates: For the Appellants: B. Bhuvaneshwari, Advocate. For the Respondents: G. Prabhu Rajadurai, Advocate.\r\n
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 100 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 AIR(Mad) 34,
...
Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 394 of 2023 with Interim Application (L) No. 23263 of 2023 In Commercial Arbitration Petition No.394 of 2023
Parties: Thermax Limited Versus Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.I. CHAGLA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Janak Dwarkadas, a/w Mustafa Doctor, Senior Counsel’s a/w Aditya Thakkar, R. Sudhinder, Ranjit Shetty, Rahul Dev & Monika Vyas i/b Argus Partner, Advocates. For the Respondent: Shyam Mehta, Senior Counsel a/w Aditya Bapat, Mac. C. Bodhanwala, Sheraj M. Bodhanwalla, Sayali Puri, Akash Singh & Shreyas Thakur i/b M.S. Bodhanwala & Co., Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – Sections 31(3), 34 – Indian Contract Act, 1872 – Section 73 – Arbitral Award – Patent Illegality – Ignoring Vital Evidence – Consequential Loss – Damages – Commercial Use – Take Over – Preliminary Acceptance Certificate (PAC) – Petition challenged arbitral award holding Thermax liable for GTG breakdown and awarding Rs.173.72 Crores damages – Held, award suffered...
WP. (C) No. 5725 of 2022
Parties: M/s MCLEOD Russel India Limited, Represented by Shri Tridip Majumdar, Dibrugarh Versus The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to the Government of India, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: A. Kanodia, Advocate. For the Respondents: S.C. Keyal, Standing Counsel, CGST. R. Hussain, Advocate.
Head Note:
Central Goods & Services Tax Act - Section 16(2) -
...
W.P.(S) No. 3346 of 2021
Parties: Dr. Mahesh Chandra Versus The Chancellor of Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Pramod Kumar, Rahul Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents: Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate, Manish Mishra, Priyadarshi, Advocates.
Head Note:
W.P. No. 47721 of 2025
Parties: Kannan @ Kanal Kannan Versus The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Iyyappan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, S. Dilliraj, Central Government Standing Counsel, R3, L. Baskaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...