WP(C) NO. 14564 of 2016
Parties: Mathews J. Nedumpara Versus Union Of India, Represented By Its Secretary, Department Of Legal Affairs, Government Of India, Sastri Bhavan, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. NITIN JAMDAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANU
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Mathews J. Nedumpara (Party-In-Person). For the Respondents: Dr. K.P. Pradeep, Advocate, S. Biju, Senior Panel Counsel, Rajit, SC, B. Vanitha Sr.GP.
Head Note:
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2(c) (i), 14, 16 & 17(5) -
Comparative Citations:
2025 KER 97826, 2026 (1) KLT 76,...
(T) CMA (TM) No. 189 of 2023
Parties: M/s. Freshtohome Foods Private Limited, Karnataka Versus The Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Appellant: P. Magesh, Advocate. For the Respondent: G. Ilangovan, Central Government Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Trade Marks Act - Section 91 -...
WP. No. 38081 of 2025 & WMP. No. 42534 & 42535 of 2025
Parties: Workmen of MRF Limited, Tiruvottiyur Plant, Rep. by its General Secretary, Chennai Versus The Management of MRF Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N. MALA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: V. Prakash, Senior counsel for S. Gokul, Advocate. For the Respondents: R3, A.N. Purushotham, Spl.GP, R1 & R2, G. Anand Gopalan for M/s. Advit Law Chambers, Advocates, R4, Dispensed.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 MHC 2967,...
WP No. 49535 of 2025
Parties: Vimala Versus The Chairman & Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Corporation, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: B. Arvind Sreevatsa, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, L. Jai Venkatesh, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...
Civil Appeal No. 14859 of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 10039 of 2025)
Parties: M/s. Surguja Bricks Industries Company Versus State Of Chhattisgarh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 14 – Constitution of India – Article 226 – Tender Conditions – Eligibility Criteria – “Prime Contractor” – Joint Venture Experience – Proportionate Experience – Arbitrary Disqualification – Judicial Review of Tender Process – Appeal – Appellant disqualified at technical evaluation stage on the ground that experience certificate was of a joint venture and not in its...
Civil Appeal No. of 2025 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No. 25584 of 2024)
Parties: Bhagyashree Bisi Versus Animesh Padhee
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Constitution of India- Article 142 - The appeal filed by the appellant/wife against the decree of divorce passed by the Family Court on the ground of desertion which was affirmed by the High Court. The appellant contended that the decree ought not to be founded on the ground of desertion, as she had not abandoned the respondent-husband and had left India on account of her professional obligations.
Court Held...
Civil Appeal No. of 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 35588 of 2025 @ D. 17190 of 2024)
Parties: Jatinder Kumar Versus Jeewan Lata
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Comparative Citations:
2025 INSC 1463, 2026 AIR(SC) 128,...
Writ Petition Crl. (MD)No. 2658 of 2025
Parties: B. Sivarajan Versus The Superintendent of Police, Madurai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SRIMATHY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P. Suresh, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R2, R3, A.S. Abul Kalaam Asad, Government Advocate (Crl.side), R4, M. Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -...
Criminal Appeal No. 1129 of 2013
Parties: Manoj @ Munna Versus The State of Chhattisgarh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302, 201 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 313 – Indian Evidence Act, 1872 – Section 106 – Circumstantial Evidence – Last Seen Theory – Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence – Appeal – Appellant challenged conviction affirmed by High Court based solely on “last seen together” evidence.
Court Held – Appeal allowed – Conviction and sentence unde...
Civil Appeal No(s). of 2025 (Arising Out of SLP (Civil) No(s). 14014-14019, 11988-11990, 12372-12373, 11566-11568, 12440-12447, 24550 of 2023,2837, 2724 of 2024)
Parties: Siddhant Mahajan & Others Versus The State of Rajasthan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Advocates: For the Petitioners: ----- For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Dentists Act, 1948 – Section 20 – Dentists (Amendment) Act, 2016 – Section 10D – Revised BDS Course Regulations, 2007 (5th Amendment) – Regulation II(5)(ii) – NEET-UG 2016 – Lowering of Minimum Percentile – Authority to Relax – Admissions to BDS Course (2016-17) – Appeals by students, private dental colleges and Dental Council of India challenging High Court judgment upholding State of Rajasthan’s relaxation of NE...