Criminal Public Interest Litigation No. 5 of 2023 with Interim Application (ST) No. 6219 of 2024 & Interim Application (ST) No. 4133 of 2023
Parties: Nanasaheb Vasantrao Jadhav Versus State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ravi Kadam, Senior Advocate with Nanasaheb V. Jadhav, Petitioner in-person, Joel Carlos, Vaibhav Bhure, Karan Kadam & A. Somandy, Advocates. For the Respondents: Amit Munde, Special Public Prosecutor, Dr. Milind Sathe, Advocate General with M.M. Deshmukh, In-Charge Public Prosecutor, Jai Vohra, Advocates.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 23, Section 24, Section 25, Section 34, Section 120B, Section 406, Section 409, Section 415, Section 420, Section 425, Section 426, Section 427, Section 430, Section 463, Section 464, Section 465 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 BHC-AS 57123,...
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1207 of 2021
Parties: Subhash Kantilal Pawar Versus The State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Dhanraj A. Lodha, Advocate. For the Respondents: Vinod Chate, A.P.P., Khanderao Tulshiram Ranjawe, ACB, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2025 BHC-AS 57830,...
Revision Petition No. NC/RP/1318 of 2025
Parties: Ashok Auto Sales Ltd. Versus Rajnesh Kumar
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, PRESIDING MEMBER
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sidhant Kapoor, Palak Rawat, Advocates. For the Respondent: ----
Head Note:
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Section 58(1 )(b) -...
Writ Petition No. 7883 of 2024
Parties: Bhagwati Akshar Empire LLP, Formerly known as Bhagwati Empire LLP, Mumbai Versus City & Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd, Navi Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM A. ANKHAD
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Akhilesh Dubey with Vagish Mishra, Amit Dubey, Uttam Dubey, Rajuram Keleriya, Shubham Sharma, Emad Khan, Alex D’Souza & Eram Baig i/by Law Counsellors, Advocates. For the Respondents: R4, Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with O.A. Chandurkar, Additional Government Pleader & G.R. Raghuwanshi, Assistant Government Pleader, R1 to R3, Soham Bhalerao with Harshit Tyagi i/by DSK Legal, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 226 – Tender Cancellation – Highest Bidder – Concluded Contract – Judicial Review – Public Interest – Earnest Money Deposit – Writ Petition – Petitioner challenged cancellation of e-auction tender after being declared highest bidder and sought allotment of plot – Held, mere status as highest bidder does not confer vested right absent issuance of allotment letter – Tender was only an...
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 468 of 2025
Parties: Ram Narayan Singh Versus The State of Bihar
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Advocates: For the Appellant: Sumit Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mukeshwar Dayal, APP.
Head Note:
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section- 13(1)(d) -...
Writ Petition No. 2417 Of 2025
Parties: Sitaramanjaneyulu Elaprolu Versus The Union of India, Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Rep. by its Secretary, Electronics Niketan, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G. Jhansi, Advocate. For the Respondents: G. Sai Narayana Rao, Standing Counsel for Central Government.
Head Note:
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 -...
WPA(P). Nos. 555, 556 & 557 of 2025
Parties: Suvendu Adhikari & Others Versus The State of West Bengal & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SUJOY PAUL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Kalyan Kr. Bandopadhyay, Indranil Roy, Sr. Advocates, Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Sr. St. Councel, Rajdeep Mazumder, DSGI, Suryaneel Das, Megha Datta, Tamoghna Pramanick, Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Akashdeep Mukherjee, Pintu Karar, Badrul Karim, Rishabh Ahmed Khan, Sk. Kiron, Suparna Dutta, Sarajit Roy, Sayed Hossain, Aritra Ghosh, Monalisha Sinha, Amirul Hossain, Sk. Jamiruddin, Subhrajit Saha, Imtiaz Akhtar, Firdous Samim, Gopa Biswas, Hasanuz Zaman Molla, Rajashree Saha, Hasibur Rahaman Jamadar, Brinta Dutta, Salini Bhattacharya, Rajosik Dutta, Naman Shah, Arka Kr. Nag, Akash Dutta, Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Arka Kumar Nag, Tirthankar Dey, Biswajit Manna, Advocates.
Head Note:
Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952 - Section 3 -...
M.S.A. No. 44 of 2024 WITH M.S.A. No. 45 of 2024
Parties: M/s. Utkal Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Represented through its, Director Shri Rakesh Bhura Versus Akhil Agarwal & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Advocates: For the Appellant: Lalit Kumar Maharana, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Mohit Agarwal, R2, P.S. Nayak, Advocates.
Head Note:
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 - Section 58 -...
Writ Petition No. 3110 of 2013
Parties: K. Venkatesh Babu Versus The Commissioner Of School Education & Others, Pradesh, Higher Education Department, Hyderabad & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K.S.V. Subba Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP For Higher Education, Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, Standing Counsel for Municipalities, Kotipalli Bhanu Kumar, GP For Services II.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 16 – A.P. State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1996 – Rule 33(b) – Seniority – Roster Points – Merit Ranking – Promotion – Administrative Tribunal – Writ Petition – Writ Petition assailed Tribunal order directing preparation of seniority based on DSC-2000 merit ranking instead of roster points – Held, law is settled that roster is meant only for ensuring reservation and not for det...
First Appeal No. 789 of 2014
Parties: Pratap Versus Indrakumar Holaram Kewalramani & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Advocates: For the Appellant: S.G. Shukla, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, Shrikant D. Sirpurkar, Advocate, R1 & R3, None.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Section 168 – Permanent Disability – Functional Disability – Future Prospects – Multiplier – Amputation of Both Legs – Enhancement of Compensation – Appeal by injured claimant against award of ₹18,11,778/- passed in MACP No.161/2010 – Tribunal assessed 20% loss of earning capacity despite amputation of both legs – Held, Schedule I of Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 read with Second S...