W.A.No. 318 of 2015
Parties: C. Nagarajan Versus The Secretary to Government, Law Department, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: V. Govarthanan, M/s. Row and Reddy, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, D. Gopal, Government Advocate, N.R. Jasimine Padma, R3, R6 to R9, L. Chandrakumar, R4, A.R. Suresh, R5, Not Ready in Notice.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
...
W.A. (MD). No. 2193 of 2023 & C.M.P. (MD). No. 17576 of 2023
Parties: Dr. G. Jayakrishnan Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its, Health & Family Welfare Department, Rep. by its Secretary, Secretary, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: N. Subramaniyan, A. Balaji, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, T. Amjad Khan, Government Advocate, R4, Mohammed Imran, R5, Niranjan, S. Kumar, R6, M. Saravanakumar, M/s. Ajmal Associates, Advocates, R3, No Appearance.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 162, 309 – Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules – Rule 10(a)(i) – Clause 15 of the Letters Patent – Appointment in absence of Recruitment/Adhoc Rules – Executive power of State – Locus standi – Aggrieved person – Retrospective Adhoc Rules (G.O.(Ms)No.125 dated 10.04.2018).
Court Held – Writ Appeal Allowed – Learned Single Judge erred in ...
Trans. Civil Misc.Petition No. 332 of 2025
Parties: Singiri Lavanya @ Kanala Lavanya Reddy Versus Singiri Chandra Sekhar
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava, Advocate. For the Respondent: Sivaprasad Reddy Venati, Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 24 -
Comparaative Citation:
2026 (2) ALT 590,
...
CRL A No. 105 of 2022 & CRL MP No. 1388 of 2022
Parties: Manikandan @ Shanmugam Versus State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Erode All Women Police Station, Erode.
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: M. Vignesh, Advocate. For the Respondent: S. Udayakumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), Assisted by T. Harshana, Advocate.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 374 -
...
Writ Petition No. 13958 of 2024
Parties: Jetti Jagannadha Rao & Others Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. RAMESH
Advocates: For the Petitioners: P. Rajesh Babu, Advocate. For the Respondents: GP for Revenue, G.R. Sudhakar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Subject
...
S.A. No. 429 of 2014
Parties: Sekar & Others Versus Sukaran (died) & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS) JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P. Jagadeesan, Advocate. For the Respondents: T.M. Hariharan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 100 – Bare Injunction – Gramanatham Land – Possession – Patta Cancellation – Burden of Proof – Communal Land Claim – Maintainability of Suit – Second Appeal – Defendants challenged appellate decree granting permanent injunction in favour of plaintiff over land in S.No.79/4 – Plaintiff relied on patta, tax payments and continuous possession – Defendants contended land b...
Writ Petition No. 6278 of 2023
Parties: Varanasi Sarath Kumar Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sricharan Telaprolu, Advocate. For the Petitioners: V.V.N. Narasimham, GP for Endowments, Devi Subhashini Anne, SC for Endowments.
Head Note:
The Endowments Act.- Section 2(27) -
...
C.M.A. No. 2700 of 2022 & C.M.P. No. 21154 of 2022
Parties: The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Salem Versus Murugayee & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates: For the Appellant: D. Nitin, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, R. Prabakar, R3, Deepan Uday, R4, J. Chandran, Advocates.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 173 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) TNMAC 289,
...
S.A. No. 789 of 2014
Parties: K. Kandasamy Versus P. Natarajan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS) JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M/s. C.B. Geeth Sanchitra, M. Guruprasad, Advocates. For the Respondents: R2 & R3, Dinesh, Advocate, R1, Set exparte.
Head Note:
Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Sections 38, 41(h) – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Sections 96, 100 – Order VIII Rule 6-A – Order XLI Rule 33 – Bare Injunction Suit – Decree for Specific Performance – Prior Purchaser – Counter-claim – Composite Decree – Possession – Second Appeal – Plaintiff relied on ex parte decree dated 17.03.2005 in O.S. No.99 of 2005 for specific performance and filed subsequent sui...
Criminal Appeal No. 1745 of 2019
Parties: Vishal Ganesh Kasabe Versus State of Maharashtra, Represented by Public Prosecutor, Through Officer-in-Charge, Pune
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE REVATI MOHITE DERE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDESH D. PATIL
Advocates: For the Appellant: Akshay Bankapur, Advocate. For the Respondent: P.P. Shinde, Addl. P.P.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 r/w 34 – Circumstantial Evidence – Dying Declaration – FIR – Benefit of Doubt – Appeal against conviction for murder based on alleged oral dying declaration and circumstantial evidence – Appellant’s name not mentioned in FIR and introduced subsequently – Key witness testimony inconsistent with Section 164 CrPC statement – Recovery evidence doubtful.
Court Held – Crimi...