W.P. Nos. 31066 OF 2021
Parties: M/s. Kumaraswamy Silica Mines, Chillakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore Versus The Government of India, represented by its Director, Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change, New Delhi & others.
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P. Veera Reddy, Sr. Advocate assisted by B. Sarma, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, G. Sai Narayana Rao, learned counsel for Anusha, Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology, Ganta Rama Rao, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri Kambampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 226 – National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – Sections 14, 15, 16 & 22 – Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 – Environmental Clearance – Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 – Common Cause v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 499 – Locus Standi – Person Aggrieved – Alternative Remedy – Suo Motu Powers of NGT – Violation Category – Principles of Natural Justice &...
M.A.C.M.A. Nos. 724 of 2012 & 2277 of 2013
Parties: The APSRTC, Rep.By Md, Musheerabad, Hyd, Rep.By Its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad Rep.By Its Regional Manager, Anantapur Versus Meda Bhanu Manoj & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Sanisetty Venkateswarlu, SC for APSRTC, Ineni Venkata Prasad, Advocate.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Sections 168, 169, 176 – A.P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 – Rule 476 – Fatal Accidents Act – Compensation – Negligence – Future Prospects – Multiplier – Consortium – Non-joinder – Appeals – Claimants sought enhancement of compensation while APSRTC disputed negligence and liability – Held, evidence of eyewitness, crime record, and departmental action against bus driver establis...
[WP(C) Nos. 38316, 36636, 37812, 38178, 38436, 38552, 38670, 38757 of 2025
Parties: E. P. Gopakumar & Others Versus Union Of India, Represented By Its Secretary (Department Of Revenue) Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India, New Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A. ZIYAD RAHMAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: V.K. Prasad, C.F. Josna, Rintu Paul, Advocates. For the Respondents: P.T. Dinesh,Senior Standing Counsel For Cgst, K.S. Praveen, Cgc, L. Girija, CGC, P.R. Sreejith, Sanjana R. Nair, CGC ,Sr. Standing Counsel, For The Cgst, V. Girishkumar, Sc, Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs, P. Fazil, .Jithin Paul Varghese, Saju Thaliath , C. Prabitha, Fadil Fazil, Aswathy Jayachandran, Akshaya Thomas, George Cherian (Sr.), M. Santhy, Latha Anand, Anna Rose Nambadan, S. Vishnu, Vidya Gangadharan, Thomas Glaison, (Arikkattil), Sunil Shanker, S.S. Varsha, C. Prabitha , Saju Thaliath , Pauly Mathew Muricken , H. Ramanan, Vidya Gangadharan, Rosanna C. Wilson , S. Asvino Sheej, Arathi Prabhakaran, Advocates.
Head Note:
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Sections 9(3), 9(4), 11(1), 15(5), 148 – Notification No. 16/2025–Central Tax (Rate); G.S.R. 666(E) dated 17.09.2025 – Clause 36D – Health Insurance – GST Exemption – Group Insurance Policy – Retired Bank Employees – Writ Petitions. Petitioners, retired bank employees covered under group health insurance schemes, sought exemption from GST on premium relying on G.S.R. 666(E) dated 17....
CRL.A No. 178 of 2010
Parties: P.V. Ravi Versus Spe/Cbi Kochi Rep.By The Standing Counsel For Cbi/Public, Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam.
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Advocates: For the Appellant: ----- For the Respondent: Sasthamangalam S. Ajithkumar, SC, Central Bureau Of Investigation, Sreelal N.Warrier, Spl. Public Prosecutor, (CBI).
Head Note:
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 374 – Criminal Appeal – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 120B r/w Section 409 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) – Criminal Conspiracy – Criminal Misconduct – Housing Loan Fraud – Bank Funds – Public Servant – Misappropriation – Criminal Appeal – Second accused challenged conviction and sentence for conspiracy with Branch...
Criminal Appeal No. 140 of 2026 [Arising Out of SLP (Crl.) No. 397 of 2025]
Parties: C.S. Prasad Versus C. Satyakumar & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: ------
Head Note:
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 417, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B – Quashing of Criminal Proceedings – Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements – Appeal – De-facto complainant challenged High Court order quashing criminal proceedings arising out of alleged fraud, forgery and cheating in execution of registered settlement deeds relating to immovable property – FIR registered after directio...
Criminal Appeal No. of 2026 (@ SLP (Crl.) No.18223 of 2025)
Parties: Roshini Devi Versus The State of Telangana
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ---- For the Respondent: ------
Head Note:
Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-Leggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders [Land-Grabbers, Spurious Seed Offenders, Insecticide Offenders, Fertiliser Offenders, Food Adulteration Offenders, Fake Document Offenders, Scheduled Commodities Offenders, Forest Offenders, Gaming Offenders, Sexual Offenders, Explosive Substances Offenders, Arms Offenders, Cyber Crime Offenders and White Collar or Financial Offenders] Act, 1986 – Sections 2(a),...
Civil Revision Petition Nos. 2254 & 2259 Of 2025
Parties: Koyya Ganga Venkata Satya Bhaskara Rao & Another Versus Koyya Rama Krishnudu & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Hari Krishna Tata, Advocate. For the Respondents: N. Siva Reddy, Advocate.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order XVI Rule 6, 10(3), Section 151 – Article 227 Constitution of India – Witness Summons – Non-compliance – Arrest Warrant – Production of Documents – Revision against dismissal of applications seeking reopening of evidence and coercive steps against Tahsildar – Issue whether Trial Court rightly refused to enforce attendance and production of documents.
Court Held – Revision allowed ...
Civil Revision Petition Nos. 1358, 1357 & 1359 of 2023
Parties: Gundla Govinda Rajulu & Others Versus Peddisetty Srinivasa Kumar & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: K.A. Narasimham, Advocate. For the Respondents: E.V.V.S. Ravi Kumar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Order VI Rule 17 -
Constitution of India – Article 227 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order VI Rule 17 – Amendment of Plaint – Post-Commencement of Trial – Due Diligence – Change of Nature of Suit – Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963 – Adverse Possession – Civil Revision Petitions – Revisions challenged dismissal of applications seeking amendment of plaint in suits filed for cance...
B.A. No. 114 of 2025
Parties: Pinki Saha Roy, Tripura & Another Versus The State of Tripura
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Samrat Kar Bhowmik, Senior Advocate, E. Darlong, S. Bal, S.H. Roy, Advocates. For the Respondent: Sankar Lodh, Special Public Prosecutor, S. Debnath, Advocate.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 439 -
...
W.A. Nos . 583 of 2022, 1080 & 1082 of 2020 & C.M.P. Nos. 4140 of 2022, 13183 & 13228 of 2020
Parties: The Member Secretary, Chennai Versus M. Shibikumaran & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: R. Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General assisted by C. Kathiravan, Special Government Pleader, G. Sankaran, Senior Counsel, Dr. S. Suriya, Additional Government Pleader, S. Kamadevan, S. Nedunchizhiyan, Advocates.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 178,
...