Parties:
J. Joesph Sameul, Rep. By his natural guardian / father, Job. Yesupatham Versus The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai & Others
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Advocates:
For the Petitioner: S.N. Ravichandran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R5, S. Mythreye Chandru, Special Government Pleader (Education), R6, No Appearance.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 411 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 09 Jan 2026
Parties:
H. Suvindra Krishnan & Another Versus Billroth Hospital Limited Company, Registered Under Companies Act, Rep.by its Director, Chennai & Others
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates:
For the Appellants: S. Venkata Krishna Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code - Section 96 -
...
Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 487 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 09 Jan 2026
Parties:
Ram Chandra Prasad @ Das & Another Versus The State of West Bengal
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Advocates:
For the Appellants: Soumyajit Das Mahapatra, Koustav Bagchi, Debayan Ghosh, Priti Kar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ananda Keshari, Raju Mondal, Advocates.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 325 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 CHC-AS 35,
...
Case ID: CDJ 2026 Cal HC 027 Court: High Court of Judicature at Calcutta Date: 09 Jan 2026
Parties:
Kapil Goyal Versus The Registrar Of Trade Marks
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
Advocates:
For the Appellant: Sandeep Narula, Rehan Narula, Deepanshu Singh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Nidhi Raman, Arnav Mittal, Mayank Sansanwal, Om Ram, Advocates.
Head Note:
Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Section 91 -...
Case ID: CDJ 2026 DHC 022 Court: High Court of Delhi Date: 09 Jan 2026
Parties:
Balmer Lawrie & Company Limited Versus Union of India & Others
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI
Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Pratyush Jhunjhunwala, Sruti Datta, Sakshi Singhi, Advocates. For the Respondents: Siddhartha Lahiri, Amit Sharma, Abhishek Kr. Agrahari, Advocates.
Head Note:
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 148, Section 148 A -
Comparative Citation:
2026 CHCOS 9,...
Case ID: CDJ 2026 Cal HC 024 Court: High Court of Judicature at Calcutta Date: 09 Jan 2026