Criminal Appeal No. 1927 Of 2025
Parties: Sanjay Versus Manish
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH
Advocates: For the Appellant: Ritu Raj Bhatnagar, Advocate. For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 419 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-IND 1005,...
Writ Petition No. 5028 of 2006
Parties: Shilpa Vishnu Thakur Versus State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. KARNIK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M. MODAK
Advocates: For the Petitioner: R.K. Mendadkar a/w. Priyanka Shaw, Jayshree Mendadkar, Siddhant Sawai, Jagdish Kawale, Prajakta Pashtre, Advocates. For the Respondents: P.P. Kakade, Addl. G.P. a/w. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 2569,...
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 10105 of 2017
Parties: Dinesh Biwaji Ashtikar Versus State of Maharashtra & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 – Sections 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12(1)(c), 31, 38 – Constitution of India – Articles 21A, 51A(k) – Admission under 25% Quota – Neighbourhood School – Weaker and Disadvantaged Sections – Online Procedure – Digital Inaccessibility – Infructuous Relief – Precedent Setting. Petitioner challenged High Court order declining relief for admission of children under Sectio...
Civil Appeal Nos. 00245 - 00246 Of 2026 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 1544-1545, 1737 of 2026)
Parties: Kanchana Rai Versus Geeta Sharma & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
Advocates: For the Petitioner: D. Abhinav Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: Nitin Saluja, Advocate.
Head Note:
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 – Sections 19, 21(vii), 22, 23 – Interpretation – Dependants – Widow of Son – Maintenance from Estate – Literal Rule of Interpretation – Constitutional Validity – Appeals – Respondent No.1, widow of a son of late Dr. Mahendra Prasad, sought maintenance from his estate; Family Court dismissed petition as not maintainable; High Court reversed.
Court Held – Appeals dismissed &ndas...
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 33646-33647 of 2018
Parties: Kumud Lall Versus Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Thr Lrs & Others\r\n
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 -
...
Criminal Appeal No. 228 of 2026 @ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 805 of 2026 @ Diary No. 4835 of 2025
Parties: Amit Singla Versus Union Territory Chandigarh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ----- For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 456 -
...
Criminal Appeal No. 227 of 2026 @ Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 804 of 2026 @ Diary No. 52625 of 2025
Parties: Sewak Ram Versus State of Uttar Pradesh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondent: --------
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 148, 302, 307, 323 read with Section 149 -
...
Criminal Appeal No. of 2026 (@SLP(Crl.) No. 17295 of 2025)
Parties: Jagruti Dhanesh Thorat Versus State of Maharashtra
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 364, 120B, 201, 212 read with Section 34 -
...
Criminal Appeal No. 229 of 2026 {Arising out of SLP (Crl) No. 19091 of 2025}
Parties: Jagdish Chand Sharma Versus State of Himachal Pradesh\r\n
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------- For the Respondent: ------
Head Note:
Subject
...
Writ Petition No. 23110 of 2022 (GM-POLICE)
Parties: K. Poornima Versus State Of Karnataka Department Of Home Vidhana Soudha Bangalore Represented By Its Secretary & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Ashok Haranalli, Senior Advocate, P. N. Manmohan , Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R4, Mahantesh Shettar, AGA, P.P. Hegde, Senior Advocate, R5 to R7, Gowthamdev C. Ullal, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Articles 226 and 227 – Review/Recall – Direction to “Consider” – Police Protection – Fraud on Court – Adverse Possession – Dismissal of SLP – Doctrine of Merger – Writ Petition seeking recall of order dated 12.01.2021 in W.P.No.569/2021 granting direction to consider representation and accord police protection – Rival title claims over Sy.No.42 – Petitioner deleted from array in...