W.P. Nos. 19568, 22382 & 22383 of 2015 & M.P. Nos. 1, 1, 1, 2, 2 & 2 of 2015
Parties: M. Baskar & Others Versus The Special Secretary, CMDA, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: N.L. Rajah, Senior Counsel, N.R. Elango, Senior Counsel, K. Mahendran, P. Shanmughasundaram, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, P. Kumaresan, Additional Advocate General, K. Mageshwari, Standing Counsel, R5, M. Rajasekar, Advocate, R4, No Appearance.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) LW 538,
...
Criminal Petition No. 54 of 2026
Parties: Mudra Developers A Partnership Firm, Mangaluru, Represented By Its Partners & Others Versus M/s. Aashirvad Infra Developers A Partnership Firm, D.K. District, Represented By Its Managing Partner, P. Krishnaraj Mayya
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Ravishanakar, Advocate. For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 4, 5, 223, 528, 531 – Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – Sections 138, 142, 143 – Cognizance – Summary Trial – Special Law – Pre-cognizance Hearing – Criminal Petition under Section 528 BNSS – Challenge to order taking cognizance in cheque dishonour case – Whether Magistrate bound to issue notice and hear accused under proviso to Section 223(1) BNSS before taking cogni...
W.A. (MD) No. 8 of 2026 & C.M.P. (MD) No. 59 of 2026
Parties: S. Amalraj Versus C. Sivakumar & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G. Karthikeyan, Senior Counsel, P. Subbiah, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, M. Rajesh, Advocate, R2, A. Kannan, Additional Government Pleader.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
...
W.P. (MD) Nos. 1433, 1458 of 2026 & W.M.P (MD) Nos. 1138, 1148 of 2026
Parties: M/s. S Subramanian Contractor, Represented by Proprietor Sadasivam Subramanian, Sivagangai Versus The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Thirupathur Assessment Circle, Thirupathur
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Senguttuvan, Advocate. For the Respondent: R. Suresh Kumar, AGP.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) CTC 823,
...
Writ Petition No. 16280 of 2025
Parties: M/s. Hygiene Biomed Services, Vijayawada, rep.by its Proprietor, Balla Durga Prasad Versus State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Environment, Forest, Science & Technology (Sec.VI) Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary, Amaravati & others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S.V.S.S. Sivaram, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2 to R4, Y. Soma Raju, R5, Meka Rahul Chowdary, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 14, 19(1)(g), 226 – Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 – EIA Notification, 2006 (paras 6, 7 & 8) – Bio Medical Waste Management Rules, 2016 – Revised Guidelines for Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment and Disposal Facilities, 2016 – Relocation of CBWTF – Terms of Reference (ToR) – Stage-II Scoping – Alternative Remedy under Section 16, National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 – Locus Standi &...
Writ Petition No. 34431 of 2024 (GM - CPC)
Parties: Maxlinear Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Represented By Its Authorised Representative Sridhar Ramamurthy (Director), Bengaluru & Others Versus Aptamitra Consulting Private Limited, Represented By Its Founder & CEO J.C. Manjesh, Bengaluru & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Vivek Holla a/w Maitreyi B. Kannur, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, Manu P. Kulkarni, Sukanya Basu Mallik, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order I Rule 10(2) – Sections 151 – Constitution of India – Articles 226 & 227 – Deletion of Parties – Necessary and Proper Party – Privity of Contract – Directors’ Liability – Tortious Inducement – Commercial Suit – Judicial Discretion – Corporate Veil Applications under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC require examination whether a party is necessary or proper for effe...
Criminal Petition Nos. 413, 440, 442 of 2026
Parties: Chinthaginjala Janardhan & Others Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
Advocates: For the Petitioner: G. Venkata Reddy, Advocate. For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code & 528 of BNSS - Section 437/Section 438/Section 439/Section 482 -
...
C.M.A. No. 2564 of 2024
Parties: Rajam Versus Venkatachalam & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
Advocates: For the Appellant: T.S. Arthanareeswaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R3, K. Vinod, R1, R2 & R4, No appearance.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act,1988 - Section 173 -
...
C.M.A. No. 2610 of 2022 & Cross Obj. No. 2 of 2023 & C.M.P. No. 22086 of 2023
Parties: Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Salem Versus Pushpa & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS.) JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: M. Krishnamoorthy, D. Raghu, Advocates.
Head Note:
Motor Vehicles Act - Section 173 -
...
O.S.A. Nos. 10 to 13, 15 & 16 of 2026 & C.M.P. Nos. 1392, 1391, 1395, 1398, 1439 & 1448 of 2026
Parties: D. Mohanraj Arumainayagam & Others Versus C. Jeyaratchakar & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
Advocates: For the Appellants: V. Raghavachari, Sricharan Rangarajan, Senior Advocates assisted by J. Kingsly Solomon, S. Thankasivan for M. Akila, J. Kingsly Solomon, Vineet Subramani, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, AR.L. Sundaresan, A.K. Sriram , Senior Advocates assisted by A.M. Packianathan Easter, J. Eveden Raisa & Agasthian J. Pandian, Advocates.
Head Note:
Letters Patent – Clause 15 – Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Order XXXVI Rule 1 – Interim Order – Appealability – Natural Justice – Impleadment – Election Dispute – Church Administration – Original Side Appeals – Issue whether intra-court appeal lies against interim injunction passed without hearing affected parties.
Court Held – Appeals allowed – Interim order affecting rights of par...