Total Judgements Found: 10000

First Appeal No. 238 Of 2017

Parties: Kavita Versus Sudhakar Rao Sukhsohale

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR NIRANKARI

Advocates: For the Appellant: Sandeep Singh Baghel, Advocate. For the Respondent: Pramod Kumar Thakre, Advocate.

Head Note:

Family Courts Act, 1984 - Section 19 -...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MPHC 027 Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh Date: 23 Jan 2026
A.S. No. 676 of 2020 & C.M.P. No. 8438 of 2020

Parties: The Special Tahsildar (LAO), Adi Dravidar Welfare, Tirupattur Versus K.A. Kalil Ahamed (died) & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. KUMARESH BABU

Advocates: For the Petitioner: G. Nanmaran, Special Government Pleader. For the Respondents: R2 to R7, R. Prabakar, M. Ragumankhan, Advocates, R1, Died.

Head Note:

Land Acquisition Act - Section 54 -...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 433 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 23 Jan 2026
MISC. Criminal Case No. 11691 of 2012

Parties: Arpan Tek Associates Versus Ashok Kumar Rai

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. SHARMA

Advocates: For the Applicant: Priyank Choubey, Advocate. For the Respondent: Swaraj Shukla, Advocate.

Head Note:

Negotiable Instruments, Act - Section 138 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-JBP 6745,...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MPHC 029 Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh Date: 23 Jan 2026
Writ Petition Nos. 2538 & 2254 of 2025

Parties: Dr. Rashmi Saluja versus State of Maharashtra & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR & THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MR. GAUTAM A. ANKHAD

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Amit Anand Tiwari, Senior Advocate, (through VC) with Avinash Tripathi, Sankalp A. Sharma, Ameya Vaidya, Advocates. For the Respondents: S.V. Gavand, APP, Zohaib Hussain, (through VC) with Pranjal Tripathi & Anil D. Yadav, Advocates.

Head Note:

Indian Penal Code - Section 409, Section 420 & Section 34 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 3698,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 BHC 136 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay Date: 23 Jan 2026
C.M.S.A. No. 78 of 2024

Parties: R. Rathinavelu Versus R. Suseela & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI

Advocates: For the Petitioner: PA. Sudesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Elizabeth Ravi, Advocate.

Head Note:

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 28 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 1918 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 23 Jan 2026
Crl. O.P.(MD). No. 121 of 2026

Parties: Velmurugan @ Purotta & Another Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Usilampatti Sub Division, M.Kallupatti Police Station, Madurai & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI

Advocates: For the Petitioners: D. Shanmugaraja Sethupathi, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side), R2, D. Muthupandi, Advocate.

Head Note:

BNSS, 2023 - Section 528 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 1919 Court: Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Date: 23 Jan 2026
C.R.P. (MD) No. 1314 of 2011 & C.M.A. (MD) No. 1351 of 2012 & M.P. (MD) Nos. 1 of 2011 & 1 of 2012

Parties: M/s. Subam Papers (P) Ltd., Represented by its Director, Balakumar, Tirunelveli Versus A. Kandhan

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R. POORNIMA

Advocates: For the Petitioner: M. Jerin Mathew, Advocate. For the Respondent: T.V. Lokanayaki for A. Parameswaran, Advocates.

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Section 227 -



...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 1051 Court: Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Date: 23 Jan 2026
CRL. Rev. Pet No. 92 of 2019

Parties: V.J. Joseph Versus The India Cements Limited, Kochi, Represented By Its Manager (Accounts) & Power Of Attorney Holder, K. Sridharan & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA

Advocates: Revision Petitioner: P. Muraleedharan (Irimpanam), M.A. Augustine, P. Sreekumar (Thottakkattukara), Soumya James, Thomas Jacob, Advocates. For the Respondents: K .Srikumar, (Sr.), M.N. Maya, Public Prosecutor, K. Moni, K. Manoj Chandran, Advocates.

Head Note:

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 7131,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 Ker HC 160 Court: High Court of Kerala Date: 23 Jan 2026
Writ Appeal Nos. 906, 848, 863, 948, 962 Of 2025 (MV)

Parties: Ani Technologies Private Limited, Through its Authorized Representative, Mrinalini Talukdar, Karnataka & Others Versus State Of Karnataka, Through Its Secretary Department Of Transport, Bengaluru & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI

Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: K. Arun Kumar, Senior Advocate, Faisal Sherwani, Aditya Vikram, Advocates, K. Shashikiran Shetty, Advocate General, Mahesh A. Chowdhary, Spl. Counsel, Rashi Singh, Adoorya Harish, Advocates, Omkar Margad, B.G. Nayana Tara, CGC, S. Nataraja Sharma, N.P. Amruthesh, Deeksha Amruthesh, Anupama G. Hebbar, Sankeerth Vittal, Bhavana Menon, S. Dharshini, Abdul Hadin, Advocates, Dhyan Chinnappa, Senior Advocate, Madhur A. Kalyanshetty, Saraswathy Prasad, Advocate Jayna Kothari, Senior Advocate, S. Umapathi, Advocate, Udaya Holla, Shashank Garg, Senior Advocate, A.V. Nishanth, B.M. Girish Kumar, Aradhya Chaturvedi, Manoj Aradhya, Nishtha Jain, Advocates.

Head Note:

Karnataka High Court Act - Section 4 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) KCCR(SN) 30,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 Kar HC 065 Court: High Court of Karnataka Date: 23 Jan 2026
W.P. No. 9399 of 2021 & WMP. No. 9988 of 2021

Parties: S. Nagaraj Versus Assistant General Manager, Human Resource Department, Central Bank of India, Regional Office, Chennai

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

Advocates: For the Petitioner: V. Ramamurthy, Advocate. For the Respondent: P. Magesh, Advocate.

Head Note:

Constitution of India – Article 226 – Central Bank of India Officers/Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 – Regulations 17, 21 – Condonation of Delay – Appellate Authority – Requirement of Reasons – Petitioner challenged rejection of condonation of 510 days delay in filing appeal against disciplinary order – Issue whether rejection was by competent authority and whether reasons were recorded.

Court Held &nda...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 435 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 23 Jan 2026