T.C. (MD). No. 15 of 2013
Parties: The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Madurai Versus Tvl. Veera Associates, Madurai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI
Advocates: For the Appellant: R. Suresh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader. For the Respondent: No appearance.
Head Note:
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act - Section 38(1) -
...
Writ Petition Nos. 10920, 11110 & 11897 of 2020
Parties: Kolan Rukka Reddy & Others Versus The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Reptd by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sai Prasen Gundavaram, Advocate. For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Revenue (Tg).
Head Note:
Telangana Assignment (Prevention of Transfer) Act, 1977 – Sections 3, 4, 4-A – Laoni Rules, 1950 – Assigned Land – Resumption Proceedings – Limitation – Jurisdiction – Natural Justice – Writ Petitions challenging resumption notices and appellate order.
Court Held – Writ Petitions allowed – Impugned order and notices set aside – Authorities cannot initiate resumption proceedings without establishi...
W.P. No. 152 of 2026 & WMP. Nos. 152, 155 & 159 of 2026 & 1965 of 2026
Parties: M/s. Dilip Buildcop Limited, Rep. By Authorised Signatory, Shubham Tyagi, Bhopal Versus State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to the Government, Highways & Minor ports Department, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: C. Manishankar, Senior Counsel, M. Ashwin Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 to R3, P.S. Raman, AG, R.L. Karthika, Govt. Advocate, R4, Vijay Narayanan, Senior counsel, R. Vaibhav Venkatesh, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India – Article 226 – Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 – Section 10(7) – Rules 27–30 – Tender Process – Disclosure of Reasons – Premature Challenge – Judicial Review in Contractual Matters.
Court Held – Writ Petition dismissed – Challenge premature – Reasons for rejection of bid need not be disclosed at intermediate stage; must be furnished only after final award...
Writ Petition No. 16020 of 2025
Parties: Deepak Chhagan Rathod Versus The State of Maharashtra & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.I. CHAGLA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rutika Karale, Aditya Shinde, Prashant Mahajan i/b Vaibhav V. Ugle, Advocates. For the Respondents: Yatin Shashikant Khochare, \"B\" Panel Counsel, R2, Rohit Sakhadeo, Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citations:
2026 BHC-AS 4362, 2026 Lab IC 932,
...
W.A. No. 44, 45 of 2024
Parties: Dr. Pradip Dey Versus The State of Tripura, Represented by its Principal Secretary to the Higher Education Department, Tripura & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
Advocates: For the Appellant: Arijit Bhaumik, Ishpa Chakma, Advocates. For the Respondent: Sankar Kr. Deb, Sr. Advocate, Mangal Debbarma, Additional Government Advocate, Suman Bhattacharjee, Kundan Pandey, Adwitiya Chakraborty, Advocates.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 Lab IC 940,
...
CRL. M.C. No. 2155 of 2025, CRL. M.A. Nos. 9696, 23020 of 2025
Parties: GBL Chemicals Limited, Through its Director, CMD Sh. Rishi Pilani, West Mumbai & Others Versus State of NCT of Delhi & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Puneet Sharma, Ashwani Kumar, Iti Sharma, Vignesh & Aditya Joshi, Advocates. For the Respondents: Richa Dhawan, APP.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528 -
Comparative Citations:
2026 DHC 711, 2026 (1) MWN(Cr) DCC 147,
...
Bail Appl. No. 14491 of 2025
Parties: Kamal Kumar Mandal Versus State Of Kerala Represented By The Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala, Ernakulam & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Sam Isaac Pothiyil, S. Suraja, C.A. Muhammed Suhair, N.K. Akshaya, Advocates. For the Respondents: M.C. Ashi, SR.PP .
Head Note:
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) and 8(c) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 7240,
...
WP. (IPD) No. 37 of 2025
Parties: Rajesh Rangwani Versus The Registrar of Trade Marks, Office of The Trade Marks Registry, Chennai
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Hemant Daswani, Advocate. For the Respondent: K. Subbu Ranga Bharathi, Central Government Counsel.
Head Note:
Trade Mark Rules - Rule 57 -
...
CONT.CAS.(CRL). No. 5 of 2025
Parties: Court On Its Own Motion Versus Sanjucta Kabasi, Advocate
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. (Amicus Curiae). For the Respondent: Party-In-Person.
Head Note:
Subject
...
CS (OS). No. 698 of 2025, I.A. Nos. 24508, 24510 & 28922 of 2025
Parties: Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede Versus Red Chillies Entertainments Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Authorised Representative, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Advocates: For the Plaintiff: J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Advocate, Shaktiki Sharma, Purnima Vashishtha, Jatin Parashar, Rohit Bhagat, Kunal Vats, Aprajita, Tanya Arora, Sanyam, Advocates. For the Defendants: D1, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Shyel Trehan, Sr. Advocates, Janay Jain, Monisha, Mane Bhangale, Bijal Vora, Rhea Rao, Ashutosh Agarwal, Pranav Sarthi, Rohan Poddar, Vidhi Jain, Ayush Raj, Prachi Dhingra, Udit Bajpai, Utkarsh Vatsa, D2, Angad Makkar, Raghav Goyal, Advocates, Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate, Saikrishna Rajagopal, Sidharth Chopra, Sneha Jain, Devrat Joshi, D3, Ankit Parhar, Tejpal Singh Rathore, Abhishek Kumar, Sanchi Sethi, D4, Mamta R. Jha, Rohan Ahuja, Mshruttima, D5, Amee Rana, Thejesh Rajendran, Tanuj Sharma, D6, Sankalp Udgata, Jeevan Ballav Panda, Advocates.
Head Note:
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – Section 19 – Order VII Rule 10 & 11 – Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 – Territorial Jurisdiction – Defamation – Online Publication – Suit for Damages and Injunction – Plaintiff, an IRS Officer, sought permanent injunction and damages alleging defamatory content in web series “The Ba*ds of Bollywood” – Defendants objected to maintainability on ground of lack of territorial jurisdictio...