Crl. A. No. 87 of 2019
Parties: P. Guna Versus State represented by The Inspector of Police, Killai Police Station, Cuddalore & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: S. Ganesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, A. Damodaran, Addl.P.P. Assisted by M/s. M. Arifa Thasneem, R2 to R12, R. Sankara Subbu, Advocates.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 372 -
...
W.P. (S) No. 414 of 2021
Parties: Omprakash Das Versus Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, through its General Manager (P & GA), Jharkhand & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Navin Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Kanishka Deo, AC to GP-IV, Manish Kumar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 JHHC 3448,
...
Writ Petition No. 6125 Of 2014
Parties: Heera Lal & Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SETH
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Kamal Kumar Jain, Narottam Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents: Sanjay Singh Kushwahaa, Government Advocate, Ruchil Jain, Upendra Yadav, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226/ 227 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-GWL 4588,
...
WA. (MD). Nos. 299 & 3271 of 2025 & C.M.P. (MD). Nos. 2272 & 20421 of 2025
Parties: The State of Tamil Nadu, Through its Secretary to Government Public Works Department, Chennai & Others Versus G. Ilangovan & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Veera Kathiravan, AAG, J. Ashok, AGP. For the Respondents: R2 to R5, S.P. Maharajan, Special Government Pleader, R1, VR. Shanmuganathan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Letters Patent - Clause 15 -
...
Bail Application No. 3679 of 2025
Parties: Akashdeep Karaj Singh Versus State of Maharashtra
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE NEELA GOKHALE
Advocates: For the Applicant: Abhishek Yende a/w Surbhi Agrawal, Shubham Kahite & P. Sagar, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mahesh Mule, SPP a/w Megha S. Bajoria, APP, Parth Gawde, Pradip Gharat a/w Trivankumar Karnani, Hritika Jannawar & Sumit Jadhav, Ramdas Kadam a/w Sadanand Rane, Advocates.
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 103(1), Section 109, Section 125 & Section 3(5) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 6589,
...
Writ Petition No. 5932 of 2024
Parties: Prakash Krishna Gamare & Another Versus Krishna Ganpat Gamre & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
Advocates: For the Petitioners: S.C. Mangle, a/w Tanmay M. Shembavanekar, Advocates. For the Respondents: Vijayalaxmi Obhan, i/b Pankaj Jadhav, Advocates.
Head Note:
Maharashtra Maintenance & Welfare of Parents & Senior Citizens Rules, 2010 - Rule 13 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 7137,
...
Criminal Petition No. 986 of 2025
Parties: Abhishek Kar Versus The State of Assam, Rep By The PP, Assam
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Advocates: For the Petitioner: -----. For the Respondent: -----.
Head Note:
B.N.S.S. - Section 528 -
...
WA No. 327 of 2026
Parties: K. Elias Versus Hero Fincorp Ltd, New Delhi Rep. By Its Chairman & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MURALEE KRISHNA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Athira A. Menon, Advocate. For The Respondents: P. Paulochan Antony, Advocate.
Head Note:
Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Section 5(i) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 11430,
...
Special Leave Petition (C) Diary No. 54941 of 2025
Parties: State of Odisha & Others Versus Managing Committee Of Namatara Girls High School
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: ------ For the Respondent: -----
Head Note:
Limitation Act, 1963 – Section 5 – Condonation of Delay – “Sufficient Cause” – Liberal Approach for State – Bureaucratic Delay – Procedural Red Tape – Inordinate Delay – Appeal dismissed by High Court for failure to file certified copy and delay of over 11 years – Further delay in filing SLP and re-filing – Whether delay liable to be condoned – Held, explanation offered by State is a lame excuse and no...
WP. No. 1593 of 2025
Parties: E. Perumal Versus The State of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chennai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Sathish Rajan, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, R2, D. Gopal, GA, R3, L. Baskaran, GA(Crl.Side).
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...