W.P.(C). No. 1630 of 2006 & CM APPL. No. 1417 of 2006
Parties: Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Versus Ram Ratan
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Chandan Sharma, Vikram Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondent: Chirayu Jain, Raksha Awasya, Tanishqua Dhar, Advocates.
Head Note:
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 1647,
...
Crl. A.(MD). No. 167 of 2026
Parties: Balasubramanian Versus The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi South Police Station, Thoothukudi & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K.K. Samy, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, S. Ravi, Additional Public Prosecutor, R2, Seeni Syed Amma, M/s. Roy & Roy associates, Advocates.
Head Note:
SC & ST Act - Section 14-(A)(1) -
...
Criminal Appeal No. 797 of 2022
Parties: Abuzar Ayyaz Tamboli Versus The State of Maharashtra, through Taddwadi Police Station, Pune & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. JOSHI
Advocates: For the Appellant: Anjali Patil a/w Tohid Shaikh, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, A.S. Gawai, APP, R2, Rahul Gupta a/w Saumya Goyal, Shital Chitte, Advocates.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 326-A & Section 354-D, Section 506 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 9713,
...
CRL.REV.PET No. 162 of 2026
Parties: K. Yaser Arafat Versus The Central Bureau Of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch, Cochin Represented By The Special Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Kerala
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
Advocates: For the Revision Petitioner: P.A. Mohammed Shah, Renoy Vincent, Shahir Showkath Ali Chelson Chembarathy, N. K. Abee Shejirik Fasla, Nanda Surendran, Sahal Shajahan Aquin Kuruvilla Tom, M.N. Mohammed Hussain, C.K. Nafiya Shahala, Ayisha Riswana, Advocates. For the Respondent: Sreelal N. Warrier, Spl. Public Prosecutor, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
Head Note:
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 438 & 442 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 16934,
...
Writ Petition No. 12667 of 2025
Parties: Poonam Bharat Kudale Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through Minister of Rural Development, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.J. JAMADAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Kirthika i/by Pratik Deshmukh, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP, R3 & R4, Pandurang Gaikwad (Patil), R5 & R6, Drupad Patil i/by Namit Pansare, Advocates.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 227 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 9733,
...
Criminal Appeal No. 463 Of 2016
Parties: Kaleem Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RATNESH CHANDRA SINGH BISEN
Advocates: For the Appellant: Siddharth Datt, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ajay Tamrakar, Government Advocate.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-JBP 16141,
...
Writ Petition No. 7172 Of 2026
Parties: Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Company Ltd Through Its Authorised Officer Ravi Sahu Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL VERMA
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Rahul Yadav, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ankur Mody, Additional Advocate General.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-GWL 7360,
...
Criminal Writ Petition No. 1006 of 2024
Parties: Ramdas Versus Shrikant
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MEHROZ K. PATHAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Mahesh S. Deshmukh, Advocate. For the Respondent: Zafar M. Pathan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 391 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AUG 8460,
...
WP No. 27739 of 2022
Parties: Virbac Animal Health India Pvt., Ltd. rep. by its company Secretary and GM-Legal, Jayesh Udeshi, Mumbai Versus The Union of India Rep. by its Secretary (Revenue) Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Prakash Shah, SC for A.K. Rajaraman, Advocate. For the Respondents: K. Umesh Rao, SSC.
Head Note:
Customs Act, 1962 – Sections 27, 28(2), 128(1) – Article 226 of the Constitution of India – Refund of Differential Customs Duty – DRI Investigation – Voluntary Payment – Estoppel by Conduct – Unjust Enrichment – Notification No.25/2019-Customs dated 06.07.2019 – Prospective Amendment – Writ Petition – Writ Petition filed challenging Order-in-Original dated 04.07.2022 rejecting refund of Rs.3,01,01,534/- paid durin...
CRL. A. No. 440 of 2019
Parties: Rani Versus The State Rep. By, Inspector of Police, Pennadam Police Station, Cuddalore & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JOTHIRAMAN
Advocates: For the Appellant: S. Sridevi, Legal Aid Counsel, A.S. Balaji, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, A. Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor, Assisted by M. Arifa Thaseem, R2, R4 to R6, G. Surya Narayanan, Advocates, R3 & R7 dismissed as abated vide court order dated 20.01.2026.
Head Note:
Criminal Procedure Code - Section 372 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 (1) LW(Crl) 429,
...