Second Appeal No. 568 of 2024
Parties: Paravada Simhachalam & Others Versus Tamarna Sriramurthy
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Advocates: For the Appellants: T.N.M. Ranga Rao, Advocate. For the Respondent: G. Venkata Subba Raju, Advocate.
Head Note:
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order XLI Rule 27 -
...
Writ Petition No. 9521 of 2026
Parties: Andhra Pradesh Government Employees, Association (Regd.No. 578/2010) Rep., By Its General Secretary, M. Ramesh Kumar, Andhra Pradesh Versus Union Of India, Rep., By Its Secretary, Government Of India & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Advocates: For the Petitioner: K. Anjana Rama Kameswari, Advocate. For the Respondents: G. Arun Showri(central govt. Counsel), The Advocate General, V.V. Satish, Advocate.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
Writ Petition No. 39839 Of 2012
Parties: Penumuchu Seethamma Versus A.P Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, (APSPDCL) Rep By Its Chairman & Managing Director, Tirupathi, Chittoor District & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
Advocates: For the Petitioner: P. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: S. Abdul Matheen, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of V.V. Satish, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL, GP For Home, P. Vinod Kumar, Advocate.
Head Note:
Subject
...
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No(s). 16669 of 2026
Parties: Prosecutrix of The Crime No. 27/2025 Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Another
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rachna Srivastava, Sr. Advocate, Kuldeep Jauhari, AOR, Anubhav Tyagi, Monika, Sahil Ahuja, Advocates. For the Respondents: -----
Head Note:
Subject
...
Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 1070 of 2025 with Commercial Arbitration Application No. 675 of 2025
Parties: Generic Engineering Construction & Projects Ltd. Versus Maharashtra Maritime Board
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rohaan Cama with Chetan Shah, Farnaaz Karbhari, Rahul Jain & Sharan Shetty i/b HSA Advocates, Advocates. For the Respondent: Dr. Birendra Saraf, Senior Advocate with Jay Sanklecha, Harshvardhan Nankani, Ishwar Nankani, Huzefa Khokhawala & Kartik Gupta i/b Nankani & Associates, Advocates.
Head Note:
Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 11 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-OS 10778,
...
Writ Petition No. 13026 of 2026
Parties: M/s. Divyashakti Chemicals Versus The Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, Ranga CGST Commissionerate, Hyderabad & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.M. MOHIUDDIN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: MD. Shabaz, Advocate. For the Respondents: Dominic Fernandes (senior standing counsel for CBIC).
Head Note:
Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 122(1)(ii) & 122(1)(vii) -
...
Case No. CRL. A (J) of 40 of 2022
Parties: Dipak Nayak Versus The State Of Assam. Rep. By PP, Assam & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Advocates: For the Appellant: A. Sandilya, Amicus Curiae, Advocate. For the Respondent: R1, A. Begum, Addl. P.P., Assam, R2, Dr. P. Agarwal, Legal Aid Counsel.
Head Note:
POCSO Act - Section 6 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 GAU-AS 5858,
...
CRL R.C. No. 956 of 2026 & CRL M.P. No. 7535 of 2026
Parties: M. Irfan Khan Versus S. Jawahar Lal
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. KUMARAPPAN
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M/S. R. Gokulnath, Advocate. For the Respondent: V. Ezhilan, Advocate.
Head Note:
BNSS - Section 438 r/w Section 442 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MHC 1602,
...
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(s). 13374-13375 of 2025
Parties: New Delhi Nature Society Through Verhaen Khanna Versus Director Horticulture DDA & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondents: ------
Head Note:
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 – Section 38H(6) – Wildlife Translocation – Deer Park – Protected Forest – Special Leave Petitions – Challenge to Delhi High Court orders permitting translocation of deer from A.N. Jha Deer Park, Hauz Khas, New Delhi to wildlife reserves in Rajasthan and Delhi – Petitioner opposed relocation and sought retention of deer by expansion of habitat within the Deer Park – Central Empowered Committee found...
First Appeal No. NC/FA/440 of 2025
Parties: M/s. Shivaco Versus Bishnupada Mondal
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, PRESIDING MEMBER
Advocates: For the Appellants: Pawan Kumar Ray, Advocate (IN VC). For the Respondent: --
Head Note:
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Section 51 -
...