CONT. P. No. 1342 of 2021
Parties: M. Lakshmi Versus Govindaraj, The Secretary, Uthangarai Agricultural Producers, Co-op Societies Ltd, Krishnagiri & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: M. Lakshmi, Party in Person. For the Contemnors: R1 to R4, M. Palaniswamy, Advocate.
Head Note:
Indian Penal Code - Section 454, Section 324, Section 120, Section 378, Section 379, Section 468, Section 454, Section 345, Section 420, Section 506 & Section 447 -
...
Writ Petition No. 6812 of 2024
Parties: Vikas Shikshan Mandal, Through its President/Secretary, Kolhapur & Others Versus The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, School Education & Sports Department, Mumbai & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.G. AVACHAT & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR
Advocates: For the Petitioners: Prashant Bhavake, Advocate. For the Respondents: T.J. Kapre, AGP.
Head Note:
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-KOL 802,
...
A.S. No. 338 of 2020 & C.M.P. No. 4027 of 2020
Parties: The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Unit- II, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited, Ariyalur Versus Thangaraj & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS.) JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
Advocates: For the Appellant: G. Nanmaran, Special Government Pleader (A.S.). For the Respondents: R1 to R3 R. Gokula Krishnan, Advocate, R4, R5, A. Sivaji, Standing Counsel.
Head Note:
Land Acquisition Act - Section 54 -
...
A.S. No. 64 of 2020 & C.M.P. No. 539 of 2020
Parties: The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Unit- II, Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited, Ariyalur Versus Govindasamy & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE DR.(MRS.) JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE
Advocates: For the Appellant: M. Murali, Government Advocate (A.S.). For the Respondents: R2, R3, A. Sivaji, Standing Counsel, R1, R. Gokula Krishnan, Advocate.
Head Note:
Land Acquisition Act - Section 54 -
...
W.P. (MD) No. 2662 of 2026 & W.M.P (MD) No. 2251 of 2026
Parties: Dream Infotech, Rep. by its Proprietor M.Rajesh, Tuticorin Versus The State Tax officer (Ins)-1, Office of the Joint Commissioner (Ins), Tirunelveli & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
Advocates: For the Petitioner: A. Satheesh Murugan, Advocate. For the Respondent: R. Suresh Kumar, AGP.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...
MISC. Criminal Case No. 19954 OF 2025
Parties: Kalusingh Pagri Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV S. KALGAONKAR
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Naina Solanki, Advocate. For the Respondent: Apoorv Joshi, Public Prosecutor.
Head Note:
BNSS, 2023 - Section 528 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-IND 3272,
...
A. No. 529 of 2026 & C.S.(COMM. DIV.). No. 31 of 2026
Parties: Arte Bunkering DMCC, Represented by its Authorised Representative, Office 26K, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Versus Owners & Parties interested in the Vessel MV Sea Moon, Presently lying at Chennai Port Tamil Nadu, in Indian Territorial Waters & represented by its Master
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
Advocates: For the Petitioner: Deepika Murali, Advocate. For the Respondent: ------.
Head Note:
Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 - Section 4(1)(l) -
...
Writ Petition No. 2575 Of 2026
Parties: Mahesh Kumar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA
Advocates: For the Petitioner Mohit Pandya, Advocate. For the Respondents: Kushal Goyal, Deputy Advocate General.
Head Note:
Constitution of India - Article 226 -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-IND 3185,
...
Criminal Appeal No. 8182 Of 2019
Parties: Alkesh & Others Versus Praveen & Others
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH
Advocates: For the Appellants: Rishiraj Trivedi, Gaurav Laad, Navendu Joshi, Advocates. For the Respondents: R3, Ambuj Patel, GA, Anshul Shrivastava, Advocate.
Head Note:
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 14A (1) -
Comparative Citation:
2026 MPHC-IND 3341,
...
Criminal Appeal No.616 of 2025
Parties: Deepak Mehta Versus State of Uttarakhand
Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTHA SAH
Advocates: For the Appellant: Ashish Nainwal, Advocate holding brief of Pankaj Semwal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Vipul Painully, AGA.
Head Note:
Subject
...