C.R.P.(MD). Nos. 3325 of 2023 & 1866 & 2075 of 2024 & C.M.P.(MD). No. 17174 of 2023 & 17835 of 2024

Parties: Saritha Others Versus Jeyalakshmi & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR

Advocates: For the Petitioner: J. John, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 & R2, Vijayakumari Natarajan

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 227 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 1078 Court: Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
WP(C) No. 25229 of 2024

Parties: I. Bindhu Versus Thiruvananthapuram Service Co-Operative Bank Limited, , Thiruvananthapuram, Represented By Its Secretary & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. GOPINATH

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Gopakumar R.Thaliyal, M.S. Vijayachandra Ababu, R.B. Balachandran, Jithu S. Babu, Advocates. Fort the Respondents: Mable C Kurian (GP), N. Anand, T.L. Sreeram, O.N. Rajesh, Roy Antony, Advocates.

Head Note:

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 2A (2) -

Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 14641,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 Ker HC 282 Court: High Court of Kerala Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
Arbitration O.P.(Com.Div.). No. 692 of 2022

Parties: Cantonment Board, St. Thomas Mount & Pallavaram, rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Chennai Versus M/s. Babuji Civil Constructions, Rep. by its Proprietor C. Saravanan, Villupuram

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

Advocates: For the Petitioner: C. Mohan & Rexy Josephine Mary, M/s. King & Patridge, Advocate. For the Respondent: A.K. Sriram, SC, K.J. Parthasarathy, Advocate.

Head Note:

Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 1076 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
Appeal Suit No. 4145 of 2003

Parties: D. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy Versus D. Hanumanthamma & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

Advocates: For the Appellant: K.L.N. Swamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Vivekananda Virupaksha, H. Prahalada Reddy, Advocates.

Head Note:

Civil Procedure Code - Section 96 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 APHC 241 Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
Crl.Mc No. 4832 of 2020

Parties: Balachandran Versus Sajan Mathew & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. GIRISH

Advocates: For the Petitioner: S. Ranjit, V.V. H. Gokul Das, Advocates. For the Respondents: Liji. J. Vadakedom, Rajeev Jyothish George, Rexy Elizabeth Thomas, K. Anju Davis, G. Sudheer, Public Prosecutor.

Head Note:

Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 - Section 138 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 KER 13892,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 Ker HC 279 Court: High Court of Kerala Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
Writ Petition No. 4712 of 2026

Parties: G.V. Hanumanthu Rao Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary To Government, Forest, Environment, Amaravati & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. RAMESH

Advocates: For the Petitioner: ---- For the Respondents: ----

Head Note:

Constitution of India - Article 226 -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 APHC 242 Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
Civil Appeal No(s). 2211 of 2024

Parties: Power Trust (Promoter of Hiranmaye Energy Ltd.) Versus Bhuvan Madan (Interim Resolution Professional of Hiranmaye Energy Ltd.) & Others

Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SURYA KANT, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOYMALYA BAGCHI & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI

Advocates: For the Petitioner: ------ For the Respondent: ------

Head Note:

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 62 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 INSC 166,

(Full Bench)
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 SC 237 Court: Supreme Court of India Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
WP. Nos. 45322, 47781, 42811, 48593, 40291, 49895 of 2025, WP.(MD). No. 32790 of 2025, WMP. Nos. 55777, 53352, 53351, 45250, 47863, 50473, 54382, 50475 of 2025, WMP. Nos. 53347, 47862, 45248, 50472, 53346, 54380, 55776 of 2025 & WMP.(MD). No. 25850 of 2025

Parties: Tamizhaga Makkal Munnertra Kazhagam, Rep. by its President, John Pandian, Chennai Versus The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India, New Delhi & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G. ARUL MURUGAN

Advocates: For the Appearing Parties: Anand, Addl. Government Pleader, S. Prabakaran, Senior Counsel, N.L. Rajah, Senior Counsel, R. Srinivas, Senior Counsel, P. Wilson, Senior Counsel, G. Rajagopalan, Senior Counsel, D. Veerakumar, E. Vijay Niranjan Rajagopalan, K.R. Arun Shabari, Richardson Wilson, I. Abisha Isaac, A. John Vincent K. Gowtham Kumar, N.S. Amogh Simha, M/s. Isaac Chambers, M/s. Mythili Srinivas, Advocates.

Head Note:

RP Act - Section 29A -
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 MHC 1080 Court: High Court of Judicature at Madras Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
O.M.P. (COMM). No. 233 of 2025 & I.A. No. 15455 of 2025

Parties: Steel Authority Of India Limited Versus Primetals Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Advocates: For the Petitioner: Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocate, Samaksh Goyal, Advocate. For the Respondent: Rajesh Markanda, Keshri Kumar, Saurav Markanda, Advocates.

Head Note:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 -

Comparative Citation:
2026 DHC 1325,
...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 DHC 120 Court: High Court of Delhi Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →
Crl.Rev.Pet No. 229 of 2020

Parties: K.K. Jayanthan Versus Alex Jacob & Another

Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JOHNSON JOHN

Advocates: For the Petitioner: K.V. Monsy, T.N. Suresh, Dhanuja Vettathu, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1, Georgekutty Mathew, M.M. Boby, R2, Alex M. Thombra, Sr. Public Prosecutor.

Head Note:

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 118 and 139 – The revision petitioner/ accused is challenging the conviction order.  The revision petitioner contended that the cheque is not supported by valid consideration and therefore, the complainant is not entitled for the benefit of the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I Act.

Court Held: - that the evidence of PW1 regarding the transaction and issuance of the cheq...

Case ID: CDJ 2026 Ker HC 277 Court: High Court of Kerala Date: 18 Feb 2026
Open With AI → Read Full Judgment →