| |
CDJ 2026 APHC 510
|
| Court : High Court of Andhra Pradesh |
| Case No : Criminal Petition No. 2562 of 2026 |
| Judges: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA |
| Parties : Khora Gobindha Versus The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By Its Public Prosecutor, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh |
| Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: Gollapalli Maheswara Rao, Advocate. For the Respondents: Public Prosecutor. |
| Date of Judgment : 06-04-2026 |
| Head Note :- |
Criminal Procedure Code - Sections 437/438/439/482 -
|
| Summary :- |
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Section 437 of Cr.P.C
- Section 438 of Cr.P.C
- Section 439 of Cr.P.C
- Section 482 of Cr.P.C
- Section 528 of BNSS
- Section 480 of BNSS
- Section 483 of BNSS
- Section 20(b)(ii)(B) r/w 8(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act
2. Catch Words:
bail, judicial custody, NDPS, non‑commercial quantity, statutory period, confession statements, charge sheet, sureties
3. Summary:
The petitioner, accused No.1 in Crime No.40/2026 under the NDPS Act, sought regular bail under Sections 437‑439, 482 of the Cr.P.C and Section 528 of the BNSS. The police had seized 8.292 kg of ganja, a non‑commercial quantity, and the accused had been in judicial custody since 25‑01‑2026. The prosecution argued that investigation was pending and no extension report had been filed. The Court noted that the statutory period for custody had elapsed, no report was filed before the Special Court, and the quantity involved was small. Consequently, the Court granted bail with a personal bond of Rs. 20,000, two sureties, and several conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and surrender of passport. Violation of conditions would permit cancellation of bail. The petition was allowed and ancillary applications were closed.
4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed |
| Judgment :- |
|
(Prayer: Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail pending disposal of Crime No.40/2026 of Pendurthi P.S., Visakhapatnam District and to pass such)
1. This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the BNSS, has been filed by the Petitioner herein/Accused No.1, seeking regular bail, in Crime No.40 of 2026 of Pendurthi P.S., Visakhapatnam District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) r/w 8(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short “NDPS Act”).
2. The case of the prosecution in brief, is that, on 25.01.2026, on receipt of credible information, the police have rushed to opposite of Pendurthi Railway Station, Pendurthi. On reaching the spot, the police noticed two persons with two bags and on seeing the police, the said persons tried to escape. The Sub- Inspector along with his staff apprehended the accused. During the course of investigation, the Accused Nos. 1and 2 disclosed their address particulars and basing on the confession statements, the police have seized 8.292 Kgs of Ganja under the cover of mediators’ report.
3. Heard Sri G.Maheswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this crime and that he is in no way connected with the commission of the offence. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 25.01.2026. The contraband involved in the present crime is of 8.292 Kgs of Ganja, which is a non-commercial quantity. It is further submitted that the statutory period is over and no report has been filed before the Trial Court till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner undertakes to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon’ble Court.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the petition and contended that the investigation is still pending and the contraband involved in the present case is 8.292 Kgs of Ganja. She would further submit that no report was filed before the learned Special Court by the learned Public Prosecutor concerned seeking for extension period of judicial custody of the petitioner by indicating the progress of investigation and the specific reasons for the detention of the accused beyond the initial period.
6. Considering the submissions and upon keen perusal of the material placed on record and in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case, that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 25.01.2026, the fact that the contraband involved in the present crime is only 8.292 Kgs of Ganja, that the statutory period is over and no report has been filed before the Special Court by the prosecution, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner/accused No.1 on bail with the following conditions;
i. The petitioner/accused No.1, shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each, to the satisfaction of the learned VII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class Court, Visakhapatnam.
ii. The petitioner/accused No.1, shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate with further investigation, if any.
iii. The petitioner/accused No.1, shall not directly or indirectly tamper with evidence nor influence, intimidate, or induce any prosecution witness.
iv. The petitioner/accused No.1, shall appear before the Station House Officer, concerned, once in a week i.e., on every Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m. till filing of charge sheet.
v. The petitioner/accused No.1, shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future.
vi. The petitioner/accused No.1, shall surrender his passport, if any, to the Investigating Officer. If he claims that he does not have a passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the concerned Court.
7. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail.
8. It is also made clear that the observations made in this order are only for the purpose of deciding the bail application and they shall not be construed as opinion on the merits of the Crime.
9. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
|
| |