logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 TSHC 065 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court for the State of Telangana
Case No : Writ Petition No. 4313 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
Parties : A. Praveen Kumar Versus The State of Telangana, Rep. By its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: G. Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate. For the Respondent: Government Pleader for Revenue.
Date of Judgment : 12-02-2026
Head Note :-
Subject
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- None

2. Catch Words:
- Natural justice
- Writ petition
- Survey
- Written objections

3. Summary:
The petitioner claims ownership of a parcel of land and challenges a survey notice issued by the revenue authority, alleging violation of natural justice for not considering his oral objections. The Assistant Government Pleader contends that no written objections have been filed and that such objections, if submitted, will be considered per law. The court directed the petitioner to file written objections to the survey notice within two days. Upon receipt, the revenue officer will examine the objections in accordance with legal provisions. No costs were awarded, and any pending miscellaneous applications were closed.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed
Judgment :-

1. Heard Mr. G. Rajeshwar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. L. Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

2. The petitioner claims to be owner of the land admeasuring Ac.1-00 guntas in Survey  situated at Jammichedu Village, Gadwal Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District, on the strength of Bhu Bharati extract under Ex.P3. Survey Notice in File No.B/14/2026 was issued by respondent No.3 on 02.01.2026 directing the petitioner to attend survey in connection with land admeasuring Acs.09-33 guntas in Survey No.114 of Jammichedu Village. The petitioner personally appeared in the office of respondent No.3 and submitted all relevant documents and survey was deferred to 02.02.2026. Further, due to some reasons survey was not conducted on 02.02.2026. The petitioner submitted oral objections requesting respondent No.3 not to conduct survey. Grievance of the petitioner is that without considering his objections, respondent No.3 is proceeding with the survey. Thus, action of respondent No.3 is in violation of principles of natural justice.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that the petitioner has not submitted any written objections to the survey notice. If written objections are submitted, the same will be considered by respondent No.3 in accordance with law.

4. In the light of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to submit written objections to the survey notice in File No.B/14/2026 dated 02.01.2026 within a period of two (2) days from today. As and when such objections are submitted respondent No.3 shall consider the same, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.
 
  CDJLawJournal