logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide

24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 TSHC 013 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court for the State of Telangana
Case No : Criminal Petition No. 03 of 2026
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Parties : Sangani Sathish Versus The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor & Another
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioner: L. Bhargavakrishna, Advocate. For the Respondent: public prosecutor.
Date of Judgment : 06-01-2026
Head Note :-
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 - Section 528 -
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
- Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
- Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023
- Essential Commodities Act, 1955
- Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955
- Section 8 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955

2. Catch Words:
- Quash
- Abuse of process
- Essential commodities
- Cheating

3. Summary:
The petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 seeking to quash proceedings for alleged offences under Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The allegation involved procurement of PDS rice at low price and resale at a higher price, with 105 quintals seized. The petitioner argued lack of any complaint of deception or criminal intent, citing earlier judgments where similar prosecutions were quashed. The prosecution contended the acts amounted to cheating and violation of Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act. The Court examined the facts, found no indication of deceptive inducement or misappropriation, and held that continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process. Applying the precedent of Crl.P.No.7227 of 2025, the Court exercised its jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to quash the proceedings.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Allowed
Judgment :-

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.651 of 2025, on the file of the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Narsampet, registered for the offences punishable under Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023 and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

2. Heard Sri L.Bhargava Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused as well as Sri Jitender Rao Veeramalla, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1- State.

3. The specific allegation against the petitioner/accused is that he procured PDS Rice from ration card holders at lowest price for selling the same at higher price and on 17.10.2024 at 09:00 hours, the petitioner was found in possession of 105 Quintals of PDS rice.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that without there being any complaint from any beneficiary alleging that the Rice was procured deceptively or with a criminal intent, charging the petitioner for prosecution is untenable and improper. The allegations leveled against the petitioner cannot be sustained. Further, this Court in Crl.P.Nos.5709 of 2019 and 33493 of 2015, while considering the same situation, categorically observed that the offences alleged against the petitioner therein cannot be continued and quashed the proceedings. The petitioner herein is also entitled to the same relief and hence prayed to quash the proceedings against the petitioner.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has submitted that as per prosecution, the offences said to have been committed by the petitioner is cheating and violation of Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and hence requested to pass appropriate orders.

6. Perused the material available on record.

7. Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act contemplate that any person contravenes with the production, supply, distribution and trade of essential commodities or abetment in this regard, is punishable. As per the prosecution, the petitioner herein had procured PDS Rice from the beneficiaries after supply from the dealer.

8. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.7227 of 2025 has considered the identical facts and observed that:-

               “There is no averment indicating that the petitioners in any way deceptively induced the beneficiaries to part with the supplied PDS rice or the beneficiary entrusted the PDS rice purchased by them with the petitioners and they dishonestly misappropriated or converted to their own use or used it in violation of a lawful direction or contract. In the absence of essential factors, on the face of prosecution, this Court finds it to be a fit case to exercise the jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023. Thus, continuance of proceedings against the petitioners is abuse of process of law.”

9. The facts and circumstances of the present case also are similar to those in the above case and hence, this Court finds it to be a fit case to exercise jurisdiction under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 by applying the same analogy and to quash the proceedings against the petitioner herein.

10. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in C.C.No.651 of 2025, on the file of the learned III Additional Junior Civil Judge -cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Narsampet, are hereby quashed.

11. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

 
  CDJLawJournal