(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to, call for records on the file of the learned single judge in WP No.200704/2026 and set aside the order dated 16.02.2026 passed in WP No.200704/2026 by the learned Single Judge, and thereby by directing the Respondent No.3/RGUHS to release the exam forms by permitting the petitioner No.1 Students to appear for ensuing exams of BAMS Course 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th year, which commences from 18.02.2026 after collecting the requisite Examination Fees, in the interest of justice and equity and etc.)

Oral Judgment

R. Nataraj, J.

1. The appellants are before this Court aggrieved by the refusal to grant an ex parte interim order in W.P.No. 200704/2026.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the appellants Nos.2 and 3 had sought permission to establish the appellant No.3 which was refused and a first appeal filed by the appellant Nos.2 and 3 was dismissed. Following this, a second appeal was filed. An order passed by the Appellate Authority was challenged before this Court in W.P.No.201955/2023 and connected petition, where a further relief was sought for to permit the institution to continue the admission of students for the 1st year BAMS course during the academic year 2021-2022 and also not to withhold the results of the students in the coming years till the final adjudication of the dispute by the regulatory authorities. The said writ petitions were disposed off directing the reconsideration of the second appeal filed by the appellants Nos.2 and 3 by or before 31.03.2026. Since the second appeal of the appellant Nos.2 and 3 was not considered, they along with the appellant No.1 filed W.P. No.200704/2026 for a direction to permit the students to appear for the upcoming 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th year examinations and also not to withhold the results of the students and to regularise the admissions of the students admitted in the year 2021-22. An interim relief was also sought for to direct the RGUHS to release the examination forms by permitting the appellant No.1 to appear for the upcoming examinations of BAMS course of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th years, which commenced from 18.02.2026.

3. The learned Single Judge did not feel it appropriate to grant an ex parte interim order permitting the appellant No.1 to take up the examination. Therefore, the appellants are before this Court.

4. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the issue regarding the permission to establish the appellant No.3 is pending consideration before the regulatory authorities and therefore pending disposal of the same, the appellant No.1 be permitted to take up the examination. He submits that denial to take up the examination would cause hardship and injury to the appellant No.1. He therefore prays that pending disposal of the writ petition before the learned Single Judge, permission be granted to the appellant No.1 to take up the examination.

5. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 who would submit in unison that the question whether the appellant No.3 is entitled to establish an Ayurvedic College is pending consideration before the respondent No.2 and therefore allowing the student to complete his course would tantamount to regularising an illegality. They therefore submit that unless the said issue is considered, the appellant No.1 cannot be granted any permission to take up the examination.

6. The learned counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that the examination notification was issued in December, 2025 and that the appellants have waited till the last date and have approached this Court belatedly. He therefore submits that no indulgence can be shown to the appellants.

7. The learned counsel for the respondent No.4 submits that the respondent No.4 would abide by any order passed by this Court.

8. We have considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned counsel for the respondents.

9. As rightly contended by learned counsel for the appellants, the permission sought for the by the appellant Nos.2 and 3 to admit students during the academic year 2021-22 was rejected in terms of an order dated 25.11.2021 and 18.01.2022. The appellant Nos.1 and 2 preferred and appeal in terms of Section 29(6) of the NCISM Act, 2020. The said appeal was rejected by the Union of India vide order dated 22.12.2022. The appellants challenged the said order before this Court in W.P.Nos.201955/2023 and 201728/2024. The said writ petition was disposed off directing the reconsideration of the appeal filed by the appellant Nos.2 and 3 by or before 31.03.2026. Contemporaneously, the learned Single Judge directed RGUHS to announce the results of the examinations already taken up during August and September, 2025. The Appellants claim that the examination for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th years have commenced from 18.02.2026 and therefore the appellants filed W.P.No.200704/2026, wherein an interim order was sought for to permit the appellant No.1 to take up the examination. Having regard to the fact that the appellant No.1 was permitted to take up the examination earlier, it would not be appropriate to deny him the permission to take up the examination although he had approached the Court belatedly.

10. Therefore, without going into the merits of the contentions urged by the appellants which is pending consideration before the learned Single Judge, we deem it appropriate to permit the appellant No.1 to take up the examination that has commenced from 18.02.2026 as not doing so would be depriving the appellant No.1 of a lawful opportunity to complete the course. It is made clear that the permission granted by this Court is always subject to the outcome of the writ petition before the learned Single Judge.

11. Hence, the writ appeal is allowed. The respondent No.3 is directed to issue the examination forms to the appellants so as to enable the appellant No.1 to take up the remaining examination for the BAMS course 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th years, which has commenced from 18.02.2026 after collecting the requisite examination fee including the late fee, if any.

12. The learned counsel for the respondent No.3 is directed to intimate the respondent No.3 about this order and also instruct the respondent No.3 to comply with the same and enable the appellant No.1 to take up the remaining examinations. The appellants shall not claim any equity in the event the writ petition before the learned Single Judge is dismissed. This order is subject to the outcome of the writ petition before the learned Single Judge.

In view of disposal of the main appeal, all pending interlocutory applications stand disposed off.