logo

This Product is Licensed to ,

Change Font Style & Size  Show / Hide
24

  •            

 
CDJ 2026 BHC 129 print Preview print Next print
Court : High Court of Judicature at Bombay
Case No : Writ Petition (ST) Nos. 17467, 17477, 17569, 17570, 17582, 17740, 17821 & 17828 of 1994
Judges: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY AHUJA
Parties : Eknath Shivaji Raskar & Others Versus Transport Manager, Pune Municipal Transport & Others
Appearing Advocates : For the Petitioners: -----. For the Respondents: None Present.
Date of Judgment : 23-01-2026
Head Note :-
Comparative Citation:
2026 BHC-AS 3635,
Summary :-
1. Statutes / Acts / Rules Mentioned:
- None

2. Catch Words:
- Not mentioned.

3. Summary:
The Court issued an order on 17 November 2025 directing the petitioners to appear, warning that failure to do so would lead to dismissal of the petitions. The order further set a list date of 23 January 2026. Paragraph 3 of the order reiterated that non‑appearance by the petitioners on the next date would result in dismissal. On the scheduled date, neither the petitioners nor the respondents appeared. Consequently, the Court proceeded to dismiss the writ petitions as per its earlier warning.

4. Conclusion:
Petition Dismissed
Judgment :-

1. None for the Petitioners. None for the Respondents.

2. On 17th November 2025, the following order was passed:

                   “1. None for the Petitioners.

                   2. List on 23rd January 2026.

                   3. It is made clear that if none appears for the Petitioners on the next date, this Court will consider dismissing the Petitions.”

3. It was recorded in paragraph 3 of the said order that if none appears for the Petitioners on the next date, this Court will consider dismissing the Petitions.

4. Again today none appears for the Petitioners nor for the Respondents.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions stand dismissed.
 
  CDJLawJournal